User talk:3rdAlcove: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:Koine|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Koine]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''User comment: Please refrain from breaking the 3RR rule, in case this happens again, I will personally report this. Discuss any changes that may lead to an edit war on an article's talk page.'' [[User:AVand|<font color="#000000">'''A'''</font><font color="#FF0000">'''Vand'''</font>]][[User Talk:AVand|<sup><font color="blue">talk</font></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/AVand|<sub><font color="green">contribs</font></sub>]] 13:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC) |
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:Koine|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Koine]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''User comment: Please refrain from breaking the 3RR rule, in case this happens again, I will personally report this. Discuss any changes that may lead to an edit war on an article's talk page.'' [[User:AVand|<font color="#000000">'''A'''</font><font color="#FF0000">'''Vand'''</font>]][[User Talk:AVand|<sup><font color="blue">talk</font></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/AVand|<sub><font color="green">contribs</font></sub>]] 13:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
==HI== |
|||
My user page is my own thing and you should not be worried about it at all, stupid animal.The article is different and my page is my own and can write there what I want. The truth is sometimes painful and you should accept it as it is and not to vandalize articles.--[[User:MacedonianBoy|MacedonianBoy]] ([[User talk:MacedonianBoy|talk]]) 08:43, 6 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 08:43, 6 April 2008
I know it's wrong
...but I simply can't resist it. What would you say if I changed it to Nicholaos Michaloliakos, White Supremacist? Would you object to that?Xenovatis (talk) 13:23, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- Is Χρυσή Αυγή "white supremacist" or simply "nationalist/Greek supremacist", though? Perhaps a link to White Supremacist could cover it. (I understand that it might be hard to resist. I smiled when I came across that pic.) 3rdAlcove (talk) 13:37, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Cyprus
See my recent edit on Cyprus' talk page. As I can see you are bolder than this :-) Tomeasy (talk) 13:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
War, War indeed
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Koine. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Koine. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. User comment: Please refrain from breaking the 3RR rule, in case this happens again, I will personally report this. Discuss any changes that may lead to an edit war on an article's talk page. AVandtalkcontribs 13:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
HI
My user page is my own thing and you should not be worried about it at all, stupid animal.The article is different and my page is my own and can write there what I want. The truth is sometimes painful and you should accept it as it is and not to vandalize articles.--MacedonianBoy (talk) 08:43, 6 April 2008 (UTC)