Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

User talk:HighInBC: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:


:I see it is a stylistic rearrangement, not further codification. I have given my 2 cents. [[User talk:Chillum|<font color="Green">'''Chillum'''</font>]] 05:35, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
:I see it is a stylistic rearrangement, not further codification. I have given my 2 cents. [[User talk:Chillum|<font color="Green">'''Chillum'''</font>]] 05:35, 24 June 2009 (UTC)


== [[User:Giano/The future|User: Giano|The future]] ==

Your contributions at the above page are very welcome. However, in the interests of clarity excessive countering of the points of others (when agreeing or disagreeing) is making the page unnecessarily long and confusing. One or two points is fine, so is addressing points directly raised to you, persistant and continued countering is not - some people even find it intimidating. The page is purely to assess how many people are interested and to find out the concerns they have. The worthiness of those views can be hotly debated elsewhere at a later date, assuming enough people feel the point is worth debating. Please feel free to agree or disagree with points or raise your own views in a seperate section, but please limit your countering of others. Thank you. [[User:GiacomoReturned|Giano]] ([[User talk:GiacomoReturned|talk]]) 06:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:50, 24 June 2009

Tokens from other editors:

Archive
Talk page archives - Archive index

If you want to send me a confidential message here is my gpg public key: User talk:Chillum/GPG Public Key

Re-organised codification of incivility

Here I have rewritten the list to remove repetitions, move from worst to least, and enable numbered reference. Please let me know soon if you see any problem. Tony (talk) 01:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm I am not sure if we need to codify something as simple as "treat each other with a reasonable level of respect". I will look into it further tomorrow. Thanks for the initiative. Chillum 05:24, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I see it is a stylistic rearrangement, not further codification. I have given my 2 cents. Chillum 05:35, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Your contributions at the above page are very welcome. However, in the interests of clarity excessive countering of the points of others (when agreeing or disagreeing) is making the page unnecessarily long and confusing. One or two points is fine, so is addressing points directly raised to you, persistant and continued countering is not - some people even find it intimidating. The page is purely to assess how many people are interested and to find out the concerns they have. The worthiness of those views can be hotly debated elsewhere at a later date, assuming enough people feel the point is worth debating. Please feel free to agree or disagree with points or raise your own views in a seperate section, but please limit your countering of others. Thank you. Giano (talk) 06:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]