(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 12:
Line 12:
:I see it is a stylistic rearrangement, not further codification. I have given my 2 cents. [[User talk:Chillum|<font color="Green">'''Chillum'''</font>]] 05:35, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
:I see it is a stylistic rearrangement, not further codification. I have given my 2 cents. [[User talk:Chillum|<font color="Green">'''Chillum'''</font>]] 05:35, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Your contributions at the above page are very welcome. However, in the interests of clarity excessive countering of the points of others (when agreeing or disagreeing) is making the page unnecessarily long and confusing. One or two points is fine, so is addressing points directly raised to you, persistant and continued countering is not - some people even find it intimidating. The page is purely to assess how many people are interested and to find out the concerns they have. The worthiness of those views can be hotly debated elsewhere at a later date, assuming enough people feel the point is worth debating. Please feel free to agree or disagree with points or raise your own views in a seperate section, but please limit your countering of others. Thank you. [[User:GiacomoReturned|Giano]] ([[User talk:GiacomoReturned|talk]]) 06:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Here I have rewritten the list to remove repetitions, move from worst to least, and enable numbered reference. Please let me know soon if you see any problem. Tony(talk)01:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm I am not sure if we need to codify something as simple as "treat each other with a reasonable level of respect". I will look into it further tomorrow. Thanks for the initiative. Chillum05:24, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Your contributions at the above page are very welcome. However, in the interests of clarity excessive countering of the points of others (when agreeing or disagreeing) is making the page unnecessarily long and confusing. One or two points is fine, so is addressing points directly raised to you, persistant and continued countering is not - some people even find it intimidating. The page is purely to assess how many people are interested and to find out the concerns they have. The worthiness of those views can be hotly debated elsewhere at a later date, assuming enough people feel the point is worth debating. Please feel free to agree or disagree with points or raise your own views in a seperate section, but please limit your countering of others. Thank you. Giano (talk) 06:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]