User talk:71.127.137.154

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for homophobic activism on several pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.127.137.154 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked for "Homophobic activism on several pages". What "homophobic activism" have I carried out? I am being persecuted merely for not sharing your opinion. This is an ugly abuse of the way adults discourse in most societies around the world. This is why I say it is being done purposefully to achieve a false "consensus" - the majority who speak against the views of the minority are automatically blocked, creating the illusion of hope that you actually have anything like a "consensus" in real life. 71.246.148.238 (talk) 2:52 am, Today (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:13, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Wikipedia's reputation: the "neutral" encyclopedia by Jimbo Wales where Homosexual activism is welcome, but anything getting in its way is not tolerated
• Once again wikipedia proves that it lives up to its international reputation by stifling all opposition on sight — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.246.148.238 (talk) 02:54, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Not sure how you expect to get unblocked when you make your request on a different IP. 129.78.68.1 (talk) 03:24, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

71.127.137.154 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked for a fraudulent, spiteful reason without any warning, by a spiteful admin whose politics disagee with what I asked Jimbo. I realize that my IP has auto changed since then but I am officially barred from rejoining the conversation and this is done to ensure that only about 10 percent of editors who see things a certain way are allowed to participate, producing the illusion of a "consensus" that excludes 90 percent of earth's human population. And this being 2013, what "neutral" wikipedia does like this gets blown all over the globe the next day. 71.246.145.185 (talk) 14:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was blocked for a fraudulent, spiteful reason without any warning, by a spiteful admin whose politics disagee with what I asked Jimbo. I realize that my IP has auto changed since then but I am officially barred from rejoining the conversation and this is done to ensure that only about 10 percent of editors who see things a certain way are allowed to participate, producing the illusion of a "consensus" that excludes 90 percent of earth's human population. And this being 2013, what "neutral" wikipedia does like this gets blown all over the globe the next day. [[Special:Contributions/71.246.145.185|71.246.145.185]] ([[User talk:71.246.145.185|talk]]) 14:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was blocked for a fraudulent, spiteful reason without any warning, by a spiteful admin whose politics disagee with what I asked Jimbo. I realize that my IP has auto changed since then but I am officially barred from rejoining the conversation and this is done to ensure that only about 10 percent of editors who see things a certain way are allowed to participate, producing the illusion of a "consensus" that excludes 90 percent of earth's human population. And this being 2013, what "neutral" wikipedia does like this gets blown all over the globe the next day. [[Special:Contributions/71.246.145.185|71.246.145.185]] ([[User talk:71.246.145.185|talk]]) 14:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was blocked for a fraudulent, spiteful reason without any warning, by a spiteful admin whose politics disagee with what I asked Jimbo. I realize that my IP has auto changed since then but I am officially barred from rejoining the conversation and this is done to ensure that only about 10 percent of editors who see things a certain way are allowed to participate, producing the illusion of a "consensus" that excludes 90 percent of earth's human population. And this being 2013, what "neutral" wikipedia does like this gets blown all over the globe the next day. [[Special:Contributions/71.246.145.185|71.246.145.185]] ([[User talk:71.246.145.185|talk]]) 14:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}