Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 July 2: Difference between revisions
NEW NOMINATIONS |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
=== July 2 === |
=== July 2 === |
||
{{#ifeq:July 2|{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}|==== NEW NOMINATIONS ====}} |
|||
<!-- Please add the newest nominations to the top below this line --> |
<!-- Please add the newest nominations to the top below this line --> |
||
Revision as of 04:59, 2 July 2006
July 2
Subcategorize them to city and municipalities makes this cat more useful. Matt86hk talk 01:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete -- merge up to Category:Montenegrin people -- name contrary to policy Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories) -- for those places with sufficient number of people, create new categories Category:People from ... --William Allen Simpson 02:21, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Relisted, as it was forgotten or overlooked on the original day by closer Conscious (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) --William Allen Simpson 03:43, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as Empty, as there was exactly one place where there were enough people to bother making the Category:People from Podgorica. Maybe someday there will be more, but until then it would be pointless to create a parent to hold them. --William Allen Simpson 04:39, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
This category was created by User --Spasage on 19 May 2006.However there already existed Category:Indian Muslims created on 16 May 2006. "Indian Muslims" is widely used term . A search for "Indian Muslims" gets 294,000 hits on google [1] , whereas the similar search for "Muslim Indians" get only 18,000 hits [2] . Unlike Muslims in say Germany and Britain Muslims of India are not immigrants so "Indian Muslims' category is appropriate . Therefore the Category :Muslim Indians should be deleted.Shyamsunder 15:20, 02 July 2006 (UTC)
Upmerge as well. Like below, this one also has only one child and one parent. Caerwine Caerwhine 02:35, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Upmerge Foreign policy has one parent category, one chid category, Category:Diplomacy, and one article, Foreign policy. I don't see any thing that this category does except add an unneeded layer of heirarchy. Caerwine Caerwhine 02:27, 2 July 2006 (UTC)