User talk:Negi(afk)

WP:WQA notice

Hello, Negi(afk). This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#User:Negi.28afk.29. Thank you. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:09, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

• I would like to clarify here that I'm not attempting to put you under any undue stress. I've reviewed your edits, and outside of a single excursion [1], your contributions here to the main article namespace certainly seem worthwhile. The glaring exception here is your recent spate of personal attacks on your fellow editors. I don't care that you insult me; frankly I find people who insult me to be humorous (see my userpage). But, not everybody responds to being insulted in the same way. Most certainly, insulting other people detracts from the environment to which we all contribute and leads to a break down in civil discussion. It is also often the case that a person who uses uncivil commentary finds their own arguments to be considered in a less favorable light. It is important within that context for contributors to stay focused on content, and not make comments about the people adding the content, whether such content be in the mainspace or anywhere else on the project. Calling someone "white trash", for example, is wholly out of line. It adds nothing productive to the discussion at hand, but can add considerable heat. Whether it is true or not has absolutely no relevance. You might absolutely despise the editors whom you find yourself working with, but you must nevertheless treat them with civility. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:01, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

I have nothing but contempt for such people, and I'm merely voicing that contempt. Stupid people who know nothing about anything should be shamed into silence. I don't know why you would try to shield mental deficients whose opinions are worthless from criticism and insults?Negi(afk) (talk) 15:07, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Your edits are part of a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Article Jacob Barnett and User:Negi(afk). Thank you. SoWhy 18:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for consistent personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. lifebaka++ 18:25, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Civil

Negi(afk), I don't know who spit in your milk this morning, but please read WP:CIVIL and try to be more adult in your contributions here. I don't mind people disagreeing with me, but personal insults and mean-spirited edit summaries don't help the work move forward. You want the article deleted, that's fine. It probably will be. But it can be without insults and a course attitude. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 18:26, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Negi(afk) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Admins can fuck their own asses. Negi(afk) (talk) 18:28, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Admins can fuck their own asses. [[User:Negi(afk)|Negi(afk)]] ([[User talk:Negi(afk)#top|talk]]) 18:28, 31 March 2011 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Admins can fuck their own asses. [[User:Negi(afk)|Negi(afk)]] ([[User talk:Negi(afk)#top|talk]]) 18:28, 31 March 2011 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Admins can fuck their own asses. [[User:Negi(afk)|Negi(afk)]] ([[User talk:Negi(afk)#top|talk]]) 18:28, 31 March 2011 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}