Template talk:Student unionism in Australia: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Notability concerns |
Recommendation for change |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Notability concerns== |
==Notability concerns== |
||
This template lists a lot of non-notable groups. Has there been any discussion anywhere about whether or not these groups are notable enough to even have Wikipedia articles? --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 18:29, 2 April 2007 (UTC) |
This template lists a lot of non-notable groups. Has there been any discussion anywhere about whether or not these groups are notable enough to even have Wikipedia articles? --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 18:29, 2 April 2007 (UTC) |
||
: My recommendation is that the redlinks be removed from the template, and that some sort of "List of" link be added, to cover a paragraph on each of the groups that aren't notable enough for their own article. --[[User:Elonka|El]][[User talk:Elonka|on]][[Special:Contributions/Elonka|ka]] 17:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:05, 10 April 2007
Notability concerns
This template lists a lot of non-notable groups. Has there been any discussion anywhere about whether or not these groups are notable enough to even have Wikipedia articles? --Elonka 18:29, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- My recommendation is that the redlinks be removed from the template, and that some sort of "List of" link be added, to cover a paragraph on each of the groups that aren't notable enough for their own article. --Elonka 17:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)