Talk:Below the Root (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Atomas (1 participant)
PLAY: The Games Festival (2 participants)
FloodSim (1 participant)
Kunimitsu and Kunimitsu II (1 participant)
Blast Monkeys (2 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (6 participants)
Free Internet Chess Server (9 participants)
Gilman Louie (3 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (5 participants; relisted)
Emote (3 participants; relisted)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

largest game world? really?

The current Below the Root article claims that it featured the "largest game world of any adventure game" in 1984. This is a dubious claim and exceptionally hard to prove. Is Below the Root larger than Zork? How would you even compare them? --24.218.166.38 (talk) 17:51, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The only way to compare them would be in terms of the amount of data... which is somewhat misleading. Zork, for instance, probably has more distinct "places" than this game has screens, but the overall amount of data in this game to describe the game world is probably larger. But there's no real way to tell. So I'm going to adjust that wording. If anyone thinks it should be kept, we'll need a reliable source. Mango juice^talk 18:10, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Credits

The article mentions a Dale Disharoon as having helped create the game; this entertaining article at Hardcore Gamining 101 (on the CDi Zelda games) credits Dale DeSharone. Mobygames has a two separate entries for these people, here and here, although reading between the lines I suspect that "Disharoon" is a mistake. Which is correct? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 14:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Both are correct. He changed his name legally. He was Disharoon when he created the game, so that name should be used and (DeSharone) put in parens after it. --Bluejay Young (talk) 05:41, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently this is not just nonsense; he actually did change his name, according to the interview scanned here. "My wife didn't like the name Disharoon. She had lived in Israel for many years and wanted a different softer "sound". Something she felt was more poetic." Died in 2008. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:16, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hyperbole

The current below the root article seems chock full of hyperbole. One example is the phrase:"The graphics were exquisitely colored, highly advanced for the time". The game was fun but certainly not more colorful than any other game of its era. The color palette used by the game was the same limited (perhaps 32 or 64, definitely not more than 256) colors as all other games of the early eighties. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.96.181.64 (talk) 22:51, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I described the game as it has been described by its fans and players on discussion boards and elsewhere. Change it if you see fit. --Bluejay Young (talk) 05:43, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Below the Root (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100409115602/http://www.zeebarf.com:80/blog/index.php/tag/below-the-root/ to http://www.zeebarf.com/blog/index.php/tag/below-the-root/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:36, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re-write

I've decided to be WP:BOLD and give the article a re-write. Time Extension has posted a really strong overview of the game and I couldn't pass on giving this very obscure gem a touch up. There was a lot of work put into it before that seeme dot be more specific lore based on the novels and maybe a bit purple in the prose. Please restore items that may have been removed hastily, but I think in general the article is in a better spot. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:06, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]