Talk:Cambridgeshire Lodes
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Cambridgeshire Lodes map. |
On 4 January 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Cambridgeshire lodes. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Names
[edit]Why are they called "Lode" ? 81.225.216.21 (talk) 03:26, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- Lode meant waterway in Late Middle English. Definition added to History section of article. Bob1960evens (talk) 10:19, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Assessment
[edit]- Suitably referenced, with inline citations
- Reasonable coverage - no obvious omissions or inaccuracies
- Defined structure, with adequate lead
- Reasonably well written for grammar and flow
- Supporting materials - Infobox, map, images, POI table
- Appropriately understandable
I have assessed the article against the criteria for B-class, listed above, and as it meets these criteria, I am uprating it to B-class. Bob1960evens (talk) 10:22, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 4 January 2022
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:54, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Cambridgeshire Lodes → Cambridgeshire lodes – 'Lode' is a common noun which does not need a capital letter. The article does not capitalise 'lode' unless it is part of the name of a specific lode. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)— Relisting. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 23:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. Soham Lode and similar are correctly marked with a capital L. This is at best a line call. The lack of capitalisation on lode when it stands alone in running text is irrelevant. Andrewa (talk) 00:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Soham Lode and similar have a capital L because 'Lode' is part of their name, in the same way that the Hudson River and the Panama Canal have capital letters. A closer parallel is List of rivers of England, and all the similar lists in Lists of rivers. Verbcatcher (talk) 10:07, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Some of this is correct. But Lodes is also part of the name of the Cambridge Lodes, is it not?
- There is only one Cambridgeshire Lodes. This is made clear by the capital L. That is its meaning here.
- If we were to create a List of lodes in Cambridgeshire, that would indeed have a small l. Andrewa (talk) 22:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Soham Lode and similar have a capital L because 'Lode' is part of their name, in the same way that the Hudson River and the Panama Canal have capital letters. A closer parallel is List of rivers of England, and all the similar lists in Lists of rivers. Verbcatcher (talk) 10:07, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- I am beginning to come closer to your view, partly by comparison with the Norfolk Broads, which I would capitalise. As I see it, the issue is whether these lodes are a specific network or group. I had concluded they are simply lodes that happen to be in Cambridgeshire, and this was a convenient grouping for a Wikipedia article.
- Unfortunately, most of the cited sources are not available online. The 'Ely Ouse Lodes Strategy Study' is available online,[1] and uses a capital L for 'Ely Ouse Lodes'. The lodes discussed in that source seem to the same set as we cover, and that might be a better name for this article. Verbcatcher (talk) 08:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)