Talk:Chinese Rites controversy/GA1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:38, 3 March 2013

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomcat7 (talk · contribs) 16:10, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Some issues with File:Ricci1.jpg. Lacking source information and author make it hard to check if the license is correct. As it is a cleaned version of File:MatteoRicciProminentConvert.jpg, it is fairly easy to add the author (Anthansius Kircher) and date (1667)--Tomcat (7) 16:10, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It is done. Great suggestion! --_{(comparingChinese Wikipedia vs Baidu Baike by hanteng)} 17:37, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 ----
 *Some issues with [[:File:Ricci1.jpg]]. Lacking source information and author make it hard to check if the license is correct. As it is a cleaned version of [[:File:MatteoRicciProminentConvert.jpg]], it is fairly easy to add the author (Anthansius Kircher) and date (1667)--[[User:Tomcat7|Tomcat]] '''''([[User talk:Tomcat7|7]])''''' 16:10, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
+::Thank you. It is done. Great suggestion! --<sub>([[:zh:User:Hanteng#.E7.A0.94.E7.A9.B6.E9.81.B8.E5.9C.96|comparing]]Chinese Wikipedia vs Baidu Baike by [[User_talk:Hanteng|hanteng]])</sub> 17:37, 3 March 2013 (UTC)