Talk:History of rail transportation in the United States

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains High‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States History High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention
Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes
Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs
Other :
- Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
  - {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}}
  - {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Merger proposal

Please discuss the merger proposal at Talk:History of rail transport in North America. Thanks. Caseyjonz (talk) 06:49, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cost for passenger rail

It would be good to add a section about costs of passenger rail; for example, fares between major cities at different points in time, compared to mean income or some similar economic indicator.--Theodore Kloba (talk) 11:29, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New "Historiography" section

The just added new section to this article entitled "Historiography" seems to espouse the distinct POV that railroad history researched and written by "amateurs" and "rail fans" who are "fascinated by the memorabilia, technology and locomotives of the steam era" is of little value to others interested in railroad history whereas that written by "academics" and "professional historians" (who have apparently "lost interest" in the subject) is not. Railroad history is not limited to economics, business, management, corporate matters, etc. I find this position potentially misleading as much of what these "amateur" railroad historians have produced is well researched, verifiable, and provides valuable information on the technology and actual operations of railroads in providing transportation.

It should be noted that the recent contributions by some well known professional academic historians have also proved to be highly flawed as works of railroad history in the US. A prime example of this is Nothing Like It in the World by the late Professor Stephen Ambrose which proved to be rife with errors, poorly researched, and shoddily fact checked/edited. Interestingly the individuals who exposed these faults were "amateur rail fans". If this new article section is to be retained as being an objective view on this subject its contributor (whom I presume is a professional academic historian as opposed to a "rail fan") should provide a more balanced view on this matter and acknowledge the value of dedicated "amateur railroad historians" as well as shortcomings of the work of some of the "professionals" with no particular established personal interest in the subject. Centpacrr (talk) 20:07, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This section Is based on the argument of Professor Klein who states: The vast bulk of this work is devoted to minute descriptions of power, rolling stock, obscure short lines, and technical subjects.... But few address the larger questions of railroad history or place their topic in broader contexts. Centpacrr seems to agree with this statement--he does not take issue with this statement or with any other statement. His complaint seems to be that Stephen Ambrose made mistakes in one of his many many books. Ambrose is not held in high regard by professional historians, although he did have an academic appointment at a small school. Ambrose churned out a great many popular books On a very wide variety of topics (only one was about railroads.) Ambrose is never mentioned or cited in this article, so attacks on him have no relevance here. Rjensen (talk) 03:50, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tons of Freight

By 1880 the nation had 17,800 freight locomotives carrying 23,600 tons of freight, and 22,200 passenger locomotives.

"23,600 tons of freight" is surely too low; is this 23,600 tons per day, or 23,600,000 per year? Tabletop (talk) 09:56, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Might it mean that the locomotives are capable of carrying that much? Maybe it's not supposed to tell us at all how much per time they carried. Mechanic1c (talk) 14:41, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Titles

Is there a reason why the titles with dates all have the sates in parentheses (like (1826–1860)) except for one section, "Civil War and Reconstruction, 1861–1877"? If this is just an inconsistency, it should be rectified. Mechanic1c (talk) 14:40, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of rail transport in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101121075513/http://conrail.com/history.htm to http://www.conrail.com/history.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of rail transport in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of blacklisted link

I have removed the blacklisted link because I can't find a replacement for these link. Agusbou2015 (talk) 23:27, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]