Talk:Keechaka Vadham

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Keechaka Vadham/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 07:57, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Will review later, very old film!♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:57, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Reading now♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:00, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

• "The film was based" -don't we use present tense for films? It is a lost film though so I guess..
• "invest on the production house" -on?
• "However, some of Nataraja Mudaliar's relatives objected to it for they felt that it was not a proper story for his debut venture.[1] But " -never good to have However and but following each other
• "The production for the film cost ₹35,000,[a] which was then considered high, revealing Nataraja Mudaliar's inexperience in filmmaking.[1]" -not sure how that reveals his inexperience, you mean that he wouldn't haven known how much filmmaking would cost? Seems a bit OR, is that in the source?
• "Later a difference of opinion arose between him and his investors." -vague, can you elaborate?

@Dr. Blofeld: Resolved all your comments.  — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:44, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: ♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:16, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Keechaka Vadham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151028022043/http://archives.deccanchronicle.com/130529/entertainment-kollywood/article/classics-must-be-preserved-says-b-mahendra to http://archives.deccanchronicle.com/130529/entertainment-kollywood/article/classics-must-be-preserved-says-b-mahendra

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:30, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Passerby comment

I noticed this article was listed on WP:GOCE/REQ and I've got one idea as to something that could be reworded (I don't think I would be able to copyedit to a high enough standard to do the full article):

• In 1923, the death of his son in a fire which also burned his entire studio led Nataraja Mudaliar to retire from filmmaking. I think this'd work better if it were written as Nataraja Mudaliar retired from filmmaking in 1923 as a result of a fire that killed his son and burned his studio. or In 1923, a fire resulted in the death of his son and the destruction of his studio. Nataraja Mudaliar subsequently retired.

Hope this helps. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:52, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the suggestion. I have gone with the Nataraja Mudaliar retired from sentence. ----Kailash29792 (talk) 12:15, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

"Historical films"

Is it accurate to refer to this as a "historical film?" Most secular historians do not regard the Mahabharata as part of history. Brutannica (talk) 21:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Replaced with "films based on Hindu mythology". Kailash29792 (talk) 04:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)