Talk:Petropavlovsk-class battleship/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Buggie111 (talk · contribs) 00:39, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Don't see any problems.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Don't see any.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	None.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	In the protection paragraph, cite 12 seems to be used twice. Any way just to use it once?
	2c. it contains no original research.	None.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Yes, seems to cover everything I'd like to see in a class article.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Yes.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	No, duh.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Once again: No, duh.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Yes.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Yes.
	7. Overall assessment.	Wonderful article Sturm, I'm kind of jealous you got to do this (gotta remind myself to get back into activity in August!) I'd be glad to help you with getting Poltava/Petropavlovsk to FA to make this a featured topic. Buggie111 (talk) 01:14, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]