Template talk:Largest municipalities of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Largest municipalities of Bosnia and Herzegovina is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina

Cities

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

This template was considered for deletion on 2023 August 29. The result of the discussion was "'Keep'".

NPOV

20 is more NPOV? By all means make it more NPOV and include more. --◅ PRODUCER (TALK) 20:50, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do please bother to discuss instead of just jumping to conclusions and requesting full protection of the template for your preferred version. [1] --◅ PRODUCER (TALK) 21:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Template talk:Largest cities of Acre which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:30, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

cities vs municipalities

List of cities in Bosnia and Herzegovina has "2013 pop. (preliminary)", and that list's municipality populations are quite close to this template. So it seems these are in fact municipal populations, not city figures. 85.217.20.78 (talk) 04:21, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template 'assumes' something

The template (current version of it) assumes that are 10 divisions. In this case there are only 6, and division 7 till 10 are visibly presented as empty items. In articles this does not look very nice. Can this be fixed? Bob.v.R (talk) 00:55, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted the template as the choice to limit the template to over 100.000 inhabitants was nowhere explained. Beside that, the given source does not back up the numbers. The Banner talk 09:15, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]