2 of my favorite edits I have done was while I was watching a YouTube video published on March 18, 2015 by 000a1236. It was called "logos evolution" and at 0:50 it shows the Fiat logos. I was thinking: Wikipedia might not have that info yet. I better get to editing! First, I went to the Wikipedia article called Fiat Automobiles. I looked at the infobox. It said: "11 July 1899; 119 years ago in Turin, Piedmont, Italy". I then checked the Wikipedia article called 1899. I looked at the section July-September. I found out that July 11 was missing! I started editing. I typed this:
July 11 - Giovanni Agnelli founds the car company Fiat.
I don't know if I was supposed to type "car brand" instead, but if I do, feel free to leave a message on the Messages section on the bottom of the page. Anyways, when I do Wikipedia edits, I usually do the typing first and then I do the links or citations. In my first edit, I added a citation because it had none, but I forgot to change the template message! XDDDDDDDD
Anyways, once I published the edit, I literally clicked on the July 11 link. It was missing, again. I did another edit.
Well, I actually use Microsoft Office for Mac 2011. I keep getting this error that says "Microsoft [insert Office app here] is not optimized for your Mac." It is REALLY ANNOYING.
This user thinks they have a unified theory of the creation of the Pokémon universe.
#493
#493
This user is a Pokémon Creationist and believes that Arceus is the creator.
and more... I have just started using Wikipedia, and for your information, iOS 13 is coming in June 2019. Please leave a message on my page if one of my edits need to be fixed.
The BOLD is where making bold edits is encouraged, as it will result in either improving an article, or stimulating discussion. If your edit gets reverted, do not revert again. Instead, begin a discussion with the person who reverted your change to establish consensus.
The BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD) is an optional method of reaching consensus. It can sometimes be useful for identifying objections, keeping discussion moving forward and helping to break deadlocks. Care and diplomacy should be exercised. Some editors will see any reversion as a challenge, so be considerate and patient.
BRD doesn't work well in all situations. It is ideally suited to disputes that involve only a small number of people, all of whom are interested in making progress. There are other options, and some more suitable for other situations.
.svg){kind=small}
