User talk:The Rogue Penguin

This user may have left Wikipedia. The Rogue Penguin has not edited Wikipedia since January 2012. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives
User talk:The Rogue Penguin/Archive 1 User talk:The Rogue Penguin/Archive 2 User talk:The Rogue Penguin/Archive 3 User talk:The Rogue Penguin/Archive 4 User talk:The Rogue Penguin/Archive 5 User talk:The Rogue Penguin/Archive 6 User talk:The Rogue Penguin/Archive 7 User talk:The Rogue Penguin/Archive 8 User talk:The Rogue Penguin/Archive 9
How to archive a talk page

Welcome!

Hello The Rogue Penguin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 19:55, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Light Finding Operation

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Light Finding Operation. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Light Finding Operation. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

Any chance you could ask for your User page to be semi-protected against the repeated IP vandal? Woogee (talk) 03:45, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He's been using more than one IP account. Woogee (talk) 03:50, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Moralorel image.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Moralorel image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 12:36, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The issue regarding Code Lyoko isn't over aka Clisntover.

I suspect this user is a sock puppet of MataNui44. The editing history is ridiculously similar to Mata and Everyman21.--ETLamborghini (talk) 18:38, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How can you not say that the Code Lyoko Itunes confirmation is good enough evidence? Have you ever tried reading around? Seriously, come the end of 2010, when they are available, you had better not say "Oh my bad" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.185.141.73 (talk) 01:34, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

...for cleaning up. Drmies (talk) 06:03, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:02, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Romanization for words of English origin

On the MOS:JP talk page, a discussion has been started about including or not including romanizations for words of English origin, such as Fainaru Fantajī in Final Fantasy (ファイナルファンタジー, Fainaru Fantajī) (for the sake of simplicity, I called this case "words of English origin", more information on semantics here).

Over the course of a month, it has become apparent that both the parties proposing to include or not include those romanizations cannot be convinced by the arguments or guidelines brought up by the other side. Therefore, a compromise is trying to be found that will satisfy both parties. One suggestion on a compromise has been given already, but it has not found unanimous agreement, so additional compromises are encouraged to be suggested.

One universally accepted point was to bring more users from the affected projects in to help achieve consensus, and you were one of those selected in the process.

What this invitation is:

You should give feedback on the first suggested compromise and are highly encouraged to provide other solutions.

What this invitation is not:

This is not a vote on including or excluding such romanizations.
This is not a vote on compromises either.

It would be highly appreciated if you came over to the MOS:JP talk page and helped find a solution. Thank you in advance. Prime Blue (talk) 11:29, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Katara

I got your message and I'm not sure it's original research. In the earlier episodes when she really couldn't bend, she spent most of her time running away from people. If she had some hand-to-hand skills then she would at least have use some of them. In another episode where Ty Lee took her bending away, she could still move, but was clearly freaked by not being able to bend. Mai even taunted Katara about having to fight without bending. Also, if you look at all of her battles, she strictly uses waterbending, except in one small sequence where she tried to put together a couple of weak kicks and punches against Pakku. Pakku easily blocked that attack.

Other characters like Aang (the episode where he defeated a school bully without throwing a single punch for example), Zuko (using broadswords in several battles, winning a good number of them) and Azula (her blocking all of Zuko's attacks without firebending in their first battle) all show very good hand-to-hand skills. Katara never shows this in any episode. If you can point to one instance where she does or where the producers says she does, I'll back off my original statement. 70.18.37.237 (talk) 04:22, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shinso.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shinso.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Same guy

Are you the same guy who is editor on the Stargate Wikia on wikia? 150.203.223.246 (talk) 05:03, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, we just happen to use the same name. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 05:52, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Treehouse of Horror

Please weigh in on Template talk:Treehouse of Horror#Inclusion of episode segments, so we can generate a consensus. Thanks, Fixblor (talk) 08:55, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request

An editor keeps adding false information to Animage] claiming it comes from the Japanese Wikipedia. Animage's actual website shows their edits are wrong. An extra set of eyes on the article would be appreciated. Edward321 (talk) 00:41, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Ed, Edd n Eddy characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Ed, Edd n Eddy characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ed, Edd n Eddy characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 09:56, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 14:28, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:CODE GEASS R2 - 01 - Large 36.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:CODE GEASS R2 - 01 - Large 36.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 14:58, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:SilentmanX/Charles di Britannia

User:SilentmanX/Charles di Britannia, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:SilentmanX/Charles di Britannia and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:SilentmanX/Charles di Britannia during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 10:10, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:SilentmanX/Euphemia li Britannia

User:SilentmanX/Euphemia li Britannia, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:SilentmanX/Euphemia li Britannia and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:SilentmanX/Euphemia li Britannia during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 10:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Privaronespada.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Privaronespada.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:16, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bionicle films has been nominated for discussion

Category:Bionicle films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Izno (talk) 18:39, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Timcanpi" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Timcanpi. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 16#Timcanpi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Descent(Blade: The Series episode)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Descent(Blade: The Series episode). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 14#Descent(Blade: The Series episode) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Gonnym (talk) 12:34, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bionicle books

A tag has been placed on Category:Bionicle books indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Moralorel image.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Moralorel image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Genjutsu (Naruto)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Genjutsu (Naruto) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 16#Genjutsu (Naruto) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay (talk) 07:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Taijutsu (Naruto)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Taijutsu (Naruto) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 16#Taijutsu (Naruto) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay (talk) 07:34, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Diethard Reid(Code Geass)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Diethard Reid(Code Geass) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 16#Diethard Reid(Code Geass) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 00:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Eureka (American TV series) has been nominated for renaming

Category:Eureka (American TV series) has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:18, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]