User talk:Jannatulbaqi

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gangadhar Nehru has been accepted

Gangadhar Nehru, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Joe (talk) 06:58, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdur Rehman Shah Sailani has been accepted

Abdur Rehman Shah Sailani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Baqi:) (talk) 17:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

Hey man im josh (talk) 14:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Abdur Rehman Shah Sailani moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Abdur Rehman Shah Sailani, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 15:05, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your contribution. With due respect, if you believe this article is not ready for the mainspace, you are welcome to nominate it for AfD (Articles for Deletion). Thank you, Cheers and Happy editing!!! Baqi:) (talk) 15:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

@Jannatulbaqi I have replied you below. I think you should desist dodging the system. Maliner (talk) 15:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

It is not about accepting a draft yourself, but it is about something disrespectful to the New Page patroller when you revert their draftification without going through AFC. And this is the case you did here. Earlier I politely told you that your content for the Sailabi Baba draft is not backed up by WP:RS. You should have listened to that. I will revert my report before anybody comments on it. Happy editing! Maliner (talk) 17:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

I acknowledge my mistake and assure you that I will take special care to avoid such errors in the future. I regret my inappropriate behavior and sincerely thank you for your understanding. I am also gradually reading through Wikipedia's policies to better familiarize myself with them. Baqi:) (talk) 06:30, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

AFC abuse

Please do not abuse AFC by accepting the self-written articles, which were earlier challenged for notability and other concerns. This is a dodging of the system and may revoke your AFC helper script. If your self-written articles were challenged by someone, then please allow the independent reviewer to assess whether they should fit for Wikipedia or not. Maliner (talk) 15:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

You are far more experienced than I am, and I deeply respect you. Your contributions to Wikipedia are truly commendable, and I hold them in the highest regard. Regarding the draft article I submitted and got accepted, I had sought guidance on it from the Teahouse a while ago, which you can review here. I assure you; I am not trying to mislead anyone. Everything I have done is fully in line with Wikipedia’s policies. Best Regards! Baqi:) (talk) 15:23, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

If I have made any mistakes, I sincerely apologize. I will make sure to be more careful moving forward. Baqi:) (talk) 15:26, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

You are getting destroyed by your own words and actions. I thought you will be disciplined this time but I was wrong. Maliner (talk) 15:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

I apologize and acknowledge my mistake. I have returned the article to draft for further improvement. Once again, I sincerely apologize. Baqi:) (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

To be honest, I never want you to get blocked, which is why I didn't take an interest in your matters. I personally don't report suspected sockpuppets if they are changed or working in good faith, and I assume checkusers also do not block such users easily. But this is my third time that I have to come to your talk page to warn you regarding dodging the system. I have emailed Josh. If he allows me to take the report back, I will do it. But please be disciplined and follow the policy. Maliner (talk) 16:24, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

I wasn't aware that I cannot accept a draft I created myself. Otherwise, I would never have done that. My intentions were never to deceive in any way. Several months ago, I had asked a question about this on the Teahouse, which led me to accept this draft. I truly appreciate your understanding. Going forward, I will be more mindful of this. Thank you. Baqi:) (talk) 16:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Draft article creation

Hi Baqi, I have seen that my first Wikipedia draft article Draft:Pauk Ko Taw was rejected again, even if it was a notable subject with credible and reliable references, it got rejected. The article certainly is well-written, encyclopedic, sourced, and neutral. Can you explain why and how can I fix it? Where is there left to fix? Thank you! KhantWiki (talk) 17:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)