Wikipedia:Editor review/Skully Collins
Skully Collins (talk · contribs) I've been a wikipedian since January 2006 and started my contributions to Phil Collins related articles, before moving onto Formula One articles not so long ago. In total I have made about 1200 edits in my 7 months so far at wikipedia. One thing I would like to improve on is my grammer, although this isn't really easy to achieve mainly due to my Asperger Syndrome... --Skully Collins 13:16, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Reviews
Comments
- See this user's edit history with Interiot's tool and edit summary usage (Warning:Both tools have stopped updating and the edit counts are way off. Please consider using Flcelloguy's Tool or Interiot's Tool 2)
- You should probably try using edit summaries for every edit you make (so far it is at 75% for major edits) as it makes the editing history easy to follow - + it means you dont have to keep using the talk pages and posting twice fopr just one thing :D --Errant Tmorton166(Talk)(Review me) 14:01, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Also you could try and get more involved with wikipolicies. E.g. voting on WP:AFD, voting on WP:RFA or joining a wikiproject. Or even review some of the wiki plocies in the wikipedia namespace and suggest or make changes to them.. Basically what I mean is get involved with the running side of wikipedia as well as the editing side (although your extensive edits should be commended!!) --Errant Tmorton166(Talk)(Review me) 14:05, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- Damon Hill reaching FA is probably the best work I have done on Wikipedia...although I did make the most edits on the article during it's improvement process, I would like to thank SebPatrick and 4u1e for their copyediting... --Skully Collins 13:16, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- Strees? On Wikipedia? No, not yet...I try and be as factually accurate as possible first time and also for some statements, I *try* and find a reference to back it up...infact, referencing is the one thing that I find fun to do :P. If I do come accross a conflict with someone I'll try and steer clear of that article...mainly because I cannot win an argument...even when it's a subject of my interest... --Skully Collins 13:16, 26 July 2006 (UTC)