Wikipedia:Everything you need to know: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 00:3400:34, 23 February 2024 Leijurv talk contribs 15,666 bytes +2,073 Undid revision 1209661059 by Subtopic Screwup Stained Source (talk) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Belteshazzar Tag: Undo
curprev 00:2200:22, 23 February 2024 Subtopic Screwup Stained Source talk contribs 13,593 bytes −2,073 It may be OK to cite something produced by the subject; the point is that independent sources are needed also. Defining "significant viewpoint" first, to avoid confusion about what it means. If a view is too fringe to be mentioned in a broader article, a See Also link likely wouldn't appear there either. Original research is not limited to analysis of *primary* sources. Shortening things that are redundant or too detailed for a summary page. Full sentences. Using name of actual baseball player. Tags: Manual revert Reverted

curprev 03:3103:31, 17 November 2023 NinjaRobotPirate talk contribs m 15,666 bytes 0 Changed protection settings for "Wikipedia:Everything you need to know": Persistent sockpuppetry ([Edit=Require extended confirmed access] (expires 18:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)))
curprev 03:2803:28, 17 November 2023 NinjaRobotPirate talk contribs m 15,666 bytes +2,073 block evasion Tags: Rollback Reverted

curprev 22:3122:31, 16 November 2023 StuckWithBadVersions talk contribs 13,593 bytes −2,073 It may be OK to cite something produced by the subject; the point is that independent sources are needed also. Defining "significant viewpoint" first, to avoid confusion about what it means. If a view is too fringe to be mentioned in a broader article, a See Also link likely wouldn't appear there either. Original research is not limited to analysis of *primary* sources. Shortening things that are redundant or too detailed for a summary page. Full sentences. Using name of actual baseball player. Tag: Reverted

curprev 18:3718:37, 6 November 2023 Firefangledfeathers talk contribs 15,666 bytes +22 Adding {{pp-sock}} Tag: Twinkle
curprev 18:3718:37, 6 November 2023 Firefangledfeathers talk contribs m 15,644 bytes 0 Protected "Wikipedia:Everything you need to know": Persistent sock puppetry ([Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 18:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC))) Tag: Twinkle

curprev 13:1713:17, 5 November 2023 DanielRigal talk contribs m 15,644 bytes +2,180 Reverted 1 edit by 103.75.198.154 (talk) to last revision by Panian513 Tags: Twinkle Undo
curprev 07:5107:51, 5 November 2023 103.75.198.154 talk 13,464 bytes −2,180 It may be OK to cite something produced by the subject; the point is that independent sources are needed also. Defining "significant viewpoint" first, to avoid confusion about what it means. If a view is too fringe to be mentioned in a broader article, a See Also link likely wouldn't appear there either. Original research is not limited to analysis of *primary* sources. Shortening things that are redundant or too detailed for a summary page. Full sentences. Using name of actual baseball player. Tag: Reverted

curprev 02:2702:27, 3 November 2023 Alith Anar talk contribs m 15,644 bytes +2,124 Undid revision 1183245320 by 185.189.199.77 (talk) - no consensus for major changes to a project page Tag: Undo
curprev 02:2502:25, 3 November 2023 185.189.199.77 talk 13,520 bytes −2,124 It may be OK to cite something produced by the subject; the point is that independent sources are needed also. Defining "significant viewpoint" first, to avoid confusion about what it means. If a view is too fringe to be mentioned in a broader article, a See Also link likely wouldn't appear there either. Original research is not limited to analysis of *primary* sources. Shortening things that are redundant or too detailed for a summary page. Full sentences. Using name of actual baseball player. Tag: Reverted

curprev 04:4904:49, 29 October 2023 Yoshi24517 talk contribs m 15,644 bytes +2,125 Reverted edits by 201.71.2.208 (talk): no consensus for edit, get consensus FIRST before edit (HG) (3.4.12) Tags: Huggle Rollback
curprev 04:4804:48, 29 October 2023 201.71.2.208 talk 13,519 bytes −2,125 It may be OK to cite something produced by the subject; the point is that independent sources are needed also. Defining "significant viewpoint" first, to avoid confusion about what it means. If a view is too fringe to be mentioned in a broader article, a See Also link likely wouldn't appear there either. Original research is not limited to analysis of *primary* sources. Shortening things that are redundant or too detailed for a summary page. Full sentences. Using name of actual baseball player. Tag: Reverted

curprev 19:1219:12, 17 June 2023 DanielRigal talk contribs m 15,661 bytes +2,022 Reverted 1 edit by ContentIsWhatMatters (talk) to last revision by Ponyo Tags: Twinkle Undo
curprev 18:0718:07, 17 June 2023 ContentIsWhatMatters talk contribs 13,639 bytes −2,022 It may be OK to cite something produced by the subject; the point is that independent sources are needed also. Defining "significant viewpoint" first, to avoid confusion about what it means. If a view is too fringe to be mentioned in a broader article, a See Also link likely wouldn't appear there either. Original research is not limited to analysis of *primary* sources. Shortening things that are redundant or too detailed for a summary page. Full sentences. Tag: Reverted

curprev 18:4218:42, 22 February 2023 DanielRigal talk contribs m 15,568 bytes +1,382 Reverted 1 edit by One Ten Nine Ten (talk) to last revision by Daniel Case Tags: Twinkle Undo
curprev 01:5001:50, 22 February 2023 One Ten Nine Ten talk contribs 14,186 bytes −1,382 It may be OK to cite something produced by the subject; the point is that independent sources are needed also. Defining "significant viewpoint" first, to avoid confusion about what it means. If a view is too fringe to be mentioned in a broader article, a See Also link likely wouldn't appear there either. Original research is not limited to analysis of *primary* sources. Full sentences. OUTING section was way too long for a summary page. Please seriously consider content before reverting. Tag: Reverted

curprev 21:0621:06, 18 January 2023 Daniel Case talk contribs 15,568 bytes +17 +protection notice icon
curprev 21:0521:05, 18 January 2023 Daniel Case talk contribs m 15,551 bytes 0 Protected "Wikipedia:Everything you need to know": Persistent sockpuppetry: per RFPP ([Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 21:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC)) [Move=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 21:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC)))

curprev 11:5411:54, 17 January 2023 DanielRigal talk contribs m 15,551 bytes +1,009 Reverted 1 edit by 190.220.8.90 (talk) to last revision by Psychologist Guy Tags: Twinkle Undo
curprev 01:2901:29, 17 January 2023 190.220.8.90 talk 14,542 bytes −1,009 "Outing" section was way too long for a page that aims to briefly summarize policies. The rest of this seems to be an improvement as well. Tags: Undo Reverted