Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/BMW 507.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 May 2015 at 13:14:53 (UTC)

Support as nominator – Alborzagros (talk) 13:14, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Normally the year (Baujahr) of the car would be included. Since the 507 was built in the late '50s, confusing that it's pictured at a 2009 car show. Also, detail (focus) doesn't seem quite what one would expect from this large a file. Sca (talk) 15:22, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Strikes me as perhaps a tad oversharpened. This is particularly evident at the top of the windshield. Also, I agree with Sca; we should have the year of the model too. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:28, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't find the year of production but it was being manufactured from 1956 to 1959. I thing it is no big deal the exact year. Alborzagros (talk) 05:12, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a car person, but I do know that there are occasionally significant changes to models between different years. This isn't like we're asking for an exact year for a five-hundred year old painting. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 05:27, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let's take a look at here [1]. It reveals the year of car that is 1957. What's your idea about here [2]? 1959 is shown but the shape and appearance of both cars are the same. -----Alborzagros (talk) 07:10, 19 May 2015 (UTC)-----[reply]
Those photos [3], [4] and [5] claim that car is from 1959, don't they? Alborzagros (talk) 08:52, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crisco here. We could try asking the photographer. 36.73.111.104 (talk) 10:37, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support I am a bit of a car person, it is not necessary that models change every year. Most of the high end automobiles undergo only performance/components upgrades throughout their lifetime, not a major facelift or an exterior redesign. The article says that there was a Series I and II. That should be cleared up, though both of them would be indistinguishable from the outside. --Fauzan ^{✆ talk}_{✉ mail} 02:59, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd probably support if we had at least that much. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:41, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:44, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]