Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 February 15

< February 14	February 16 >

February 15

File:7e7cscd.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I would take a look at all of their other uploads as well. The bulk of them are all the editors own work and per their user page they came to Wikipedia to promote themselves. Inactive user since 2006. Soundvisions1 (talk) 16:56, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is all the files:

Some of the files are used on User:Jessiahw but except for that they are orphaned. I doubt the files can be used for other purpose. --MGA73 (talk) 16:12, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lejugepreston.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uwekils2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned userphoto. Kelly ^hi! 03:45, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Old Alexandria District Federal Courthouse.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned low quality image, obsoleted by File:Martin V.B. Bostetter, Jr. United States Courthouse.jpg. Kelly ^hi! 06:46, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:VP Bush 1981.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned low-quality derivative work. Kelly ^hi! 06:49, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oliver North 2 cropped.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned crop. Kelly ^hi! 06:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Janos Boros.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:31, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, the article about this person Janos Boros has just been removed per non notability Iaaasi (talk) 07:45, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:In and Out of Planet Earth film poster.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:00, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Typo/spelling mistake in filename, replaced (unable to upload replacement, not sure exactly why, no error message, will try again after deletion) with In and Out of Planet Earth film poster.jpg Mnemonicof (talk) 10:44, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If it is just a type we can rename. I renamed the file to File:In and Out of Planet Earth film poster.jpg. Hope this is the right name. However, is this a free poster? Or should it be fair use? --MGA73 (talk) 16:20, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The file was moved from File:In and Out of Plaent Earth film poster.jpg to File:In and Out of Planet Earth film poster.jpg by MGA73 (talk · contribs) at 16:16, 21 February 2011 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clouds view from Aircraft 3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:09, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:47, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:22, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:22, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Iraksign.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:09, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image of a sign made to mock Senator John Kerry over his comments that if you did not study hard in school, you would get stuck in Iraq. Please see http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/kerrysign.asp for more information. Though the sign is authentic and did, as the Snopes piece says, make the rounds in the media when it happened (google "halp us jon carry" and you can find plenty of articles about it), I don't think that we have any evidence that the photo was, in fact, taken by an employee of the US government in the official performance of that person's duties. It could have been taken by an embedded journalist. It could have been taken by a soldier in his off hours apart from his official duties. Either way, the license cannot be confirmed and unless we are going to use it under a claim of fair use, it should be deleted. B (talk) 15:43, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I concur with the nom. It looks like a personal snapshot but there is no clear indication of who took the picture. There growing "norm" at Wikipedia is that any image of someone is uniform is Public Domain because of a presumption it was taken by a soldeir in the line of duty (i.e - "made during the course of the person's official duties") without having any verifiable source. Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:07, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ashwednesday1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image that doesn't really add anything to the article. Seriously, it's a picture of trees on fire. Do we really think that people have never seen things on fire before such that they would need a photo to understand the concept? howcheng {chat} 17:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Yes to the nom. And if the concept is that this is not freely replaceable there needs to be (another) discussion about how to define the term. Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:09, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SWbackground2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

unused image; already deleted on commons as out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:06, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Screen 2.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, possible copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a copvio. That is from one of the Sonic the Hedgehog games. Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:12, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mista mo half face.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cookzoom.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:42, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Omnidirectional treadmill simulator.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, i'm not really clear about the licensing considering that the central figure is "courtesy of" some website Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:45, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brasil 2006 044.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (impossible to identify- user's only contribution) Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pair of opaline vases.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, user's only contribution, looks like it could have been taken from the internet somewhere, no information on the vases that would allow this image to be used in an article Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:52, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Other than they are Opaline glass, which article does not have an image? Sheesh. Anarchangel (talk) 22:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FrMichaelCarney.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

judging by user's contribs, this is the signature of a former president of St Eunan's College... can't imagine how this would ever be useful Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:54, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 3352.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:54, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eternal Flame.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no freedom of panorama in russia (this statue is apparently in Izhevsk), statue is monument to WWII victims so still copyrighted Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IL6 Crystal Structure.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:IL6 Crystal Structure.rsh.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons I think the black background makes the illustration clearer, so others may as well. 64.229.100.61 (talk) 05:52, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Purely personal preference between the two. Not 'superseded'. Consensus can change Anarchangel (talk) 22:19, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IL8 Crystal Structure.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:IL8 Solution Structure.rsh.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons I think the black background makes the illustration clearer, so others may as well. 64.229.100.61 (talk) 05:52, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Purely personal preference between the two. Not 'superseded'. Consensus can change Anarchangel (talk) 22:21, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flag of the Kingdom of Sicily 1282.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:Bandiera del Regno di Sicilia 4.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:01, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mpeg7image1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by vector version Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:01, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:B777 Orders Deliveries.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value, unsourced (so unverifiable) Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:05, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hellojames.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:06, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CityRail line faint.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Islam project.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no source for images used in collage Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Someone's project. Clap, clap, delete. Anarchangel (talk) 22:23, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Di-µ-chloro-bis(η4-1,5-cyclooctadiene)-dirhodium(I).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:Cyclooctadiene-rhodium-chloride-dimer-2D-skeletal.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RLR20 Logo BW.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:11, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Enlisted saudi army vice sergeant.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by images at Saudi Arabian military ranks Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Enlisted saudi army sergeant.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by images at Saudi Arabian military ranks Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Enlisted saudi army master sergeant.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by images at Saudi Arabian military ranks Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:United-Kingdom.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, seems to be a copyright violation Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BW RLR20 Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:13, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RLR20 Cody and Reid.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:14, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vineyardsound.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, target article The Vineyard Sound deleted Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:15, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RobertTheGreat.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, user's business card (speedy delete as advertising?) Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:15, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mrtikisushibar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

source isn't really clear, description lists a webpage. orphan and not particularly valuable, i would delete because it's more of a liability than an asset Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:16, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Metrome-(6).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

source isn't really clear, description lists a webpage. orphan and not particularly valuable, i would delete because it's more of a liability than an asset Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:16, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kirei Boardimg.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

source isn't really clear, description lists a webpage. orphan and not particularly valuable, i would delete because it's more of a liability than an asset Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:16, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ericdwinnells.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, photo of non-notable person, user's only contribution (self-photo?) Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:17, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lady of guadalupe.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: close. This ultimately needs more discussion, and is going based on free/non-free, and so I am moving this discussion to Possibly Unfree Files. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:12, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, photo of a painting, age of painting unknown (maybe is old, but can't be sure) Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment since it is a standard representation of a religious icon, would it still be protected, as it might not have enough original content? 64.229.100.61 (talk) 05:57, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Although there are literally thousands of reproductions and versions of the Virgen de Guadalupe, this one has details that either make it a reproduction of great facility or an original by a contemporary of the artist who painted the Lady of Guadalupe at Tepeyac, Mexico City, Mexico File:Virgen de guadalupe1.jpg, or possibly that same artist. Also, if you notice the cow horns at the bottom? They are both tilted to the right in our picture here, to where the horn on our right merges with the hem of her garment. Every copy of the Virgen de Guadalupe in the Google Images search reaches to the right and higher than the hem. Every other detail is so well done, it seems more like something done on purpose.

The author of this file has made a couple hundred edits to WP in 2007, two in 2009, and two in 2010. And the one image. I have left a note on their talk page asking for verification of the image details, and I hope the image can be retained until they return.Anarchangel (talk) 23:01, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Puunene sugarmill.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality, we have better photos (e.g. File:Puunene mill.jpg) Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pure Hematite.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality, we have many better photos [1] Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mike Moreno.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cigardaak.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned userphoto Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Userpatrickthumbnail.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned userphoto Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:25, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Makers of light.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, presumably copyrighted (quote says something about 1924, so it's not PD-US) Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:48, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pye.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (map of fictional country) Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:49, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pye Map.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (map of fictional country) Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:49, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pye Map2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (map of fictional country) Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pye charts. Three of them. Three times as much Pye. Bye bye, Pye. Anarchangel (talk) 23:18, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bambeaner.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (map of fictional country) Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Love four.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Love seven.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Love six.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Love three.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Love two.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Love one.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:51, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Love five.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:51, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vancouver-library.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality, better images available[2] Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rawnovembre170.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, target article Raw novembre delete Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hammernsickleredonwhite.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by vector version Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the vector version, File:Hammernsickleredonwhite.svg, is not red-on-white, it is red-on-clear That file requires a rename. 64.229.100.61 (talk) 06:00, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Evancs.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:06, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Evansc.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:06, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Happy fishing.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:06, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flag of Laos (1952-1975).PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, superseded by File:Flag of Laos (1952-1975).svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:07, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Guruparan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned userphoto Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:07, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Editcountasof211206.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Larry (cat).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete, per Peripitus' finding that it is a commercial news agency picture. Please see WP:CSD #F7(2). Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:51, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The cat is yet alive. We can obtain a free image. This is a press image that is presumably available for sale. Image fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#2. Peripitus (Talk) 20:25, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- It is highly unlikely that we will be able to get our hands on a free image of Larry. The cat resides at 10 Downing Street, a place not normally accessible for members of the general public. Indeed, the entirety of Downing Street is off limits to the public and has been for many years following a terrorist scare. That ban is not likely to be lifted any time in the future. The only people who have access to Downing Street are

MPs as they carry out their duty of being MPs, and any photos they take are likely to be as part of their work and belong to the Government.
Politicians and heads of states from other countries. Again, any photographs they take are likely to be as part of their official duties and belong to the relevant governments.
Journalists and media photographers. Any photographs they take will likely be owned by their employees
Police and other peace officers/bodyguards of visiting dignitaries. Any photographs they take will likely be owned by their forces or governments

Of course, it is possible that when Obama visits, the White House photographer will go with him and take some pictures, but I seriously doubt he will be taking snapshots of the cat. It is unlikely that the image is for sale. If anything it is a photo issued by Downing Street as part of a press release. They aren't going to stick Del Boy on the street corner selling reprints of Larry. The image has been published at least The Daily Mail newspaper, possibly others. Our using it does not reduce the value of that day's copy of The Daily Mail, or of their ability to reuse the image in the future. Matthewedwards : Chat 02:08, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So just because it is hard to get such an image (has anyone asked or tried....I see no evidence) it's ok to nick a press image ? I'm sure that press photographers take images as part of them/their employer earning income from the use of the images. NFCC#2 is specifically aimed at this. Peripitus (Talk) 20:18, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

the image is certainly for sale (see http://public.images.pressassociation.com/prvw/2.10199769.htm) for editorial use and we are using it in just that way. This use appears a very clear breach of NFCC#2. - Peripitus (Talk) 20:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, The image of the former Downing Street cat (Sybil) seems to qualify as fair use because of the reasons stated above: there is no free equivalent available and the creation of one is very unlikely. If that image qualifies as fair use, then shouldn't this image also meet the requirements? Apologies for my lack of knowledge of the guidelines, I'm new to this. Mirrorme22 (talk) 16:44, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In case it escaped notice Sybil (cat) is dead and cannot be photographed but Larry is yet in the land of the living. - Peripitus (Talk) 20:18, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Betty Brant - Spiderman.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

non-free image used decoratively. There is no sourced discussion in the article I can see of the characters' particular appearance and this image does not add significantly to reader's understanding. Image fails WP:NFCC#8. We already have a non-free image of the character's original (comic book) appearance. Peripitus (Talk) 20:40, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comic book characters have different appearances in several movies, cartoons and comics. I thought that an image of her in the films could show this difference, since one picture of the character would suggest that is how she looks like in everything. Rusted AutoParts (talk) 17:46 15 February 2011 (UTC)

If I may speak. It is quite common in comic book character articles to have a seperate image for a character in the "In other media" sections. And for the readers who mostly read in comic book character articles they would probably be familiar with it, so I don't think it fails the guideline you mentioned and I don't personally have anything wrong with seeing the difference between the comic book version and a live action portrayal of the fictional character. Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 23:34, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the (sourced) commentary on the character's appearance in this image. If reliable sources do not care enough to write about it and we have no supporting sourced text then how does this significantly increase reader's understanding of the topic as required by NFCC#8 ? - Peripitus (Talk) 20:27, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As pointed out, it's normal for the character's different appearances, be it in film, tv, comics, to have at least one picture showing how this character appeared. Not all adaptions of a story will have the characters same features as when he/she first appeared. Rusted AutoParts (talk) 17:40 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Delete: Per what Peripitus has said there is no critical commentary on the screens shot at all. What seems to be overlooked here is that certain "exemptions" currently exists for non-free material to appear in the infobox. Beyond that single image however other non-free content must have a valid reason for being there, and critical commentary about that image fulfills that need. Because a character has different looks is *not* a valid rationale for using numerous non-free images showing each of those looks. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:11, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cliff Dapper.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

image if recently deceased person who was very widely photographed. The rationale states that "no free alternative could possibly exist" which is no a supportable statement. Cliff Dapper has a huge number of images that were taken of him and a great number that have been published. There are likely to be images published early on without copyright statements (eg: publicity photos from his broadcast career) or privately taken images (say the one at http://www.baseballhappenings.net/2010_05_01_archive.html) that the author will agree to release under a free licence. There is no evidence that any reasonable effort has been taken to obtain such a freely licenced image. It seems far more likely that a free image could be obtained than the alternative. Peripitus (Talk) 20:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per what Peripitus said about obtaining a free image. There are images available from the Life magazine collection, although free via a CCL, they can not be used for commercial purposes making them not free enough for Wikipedia so would still fall under the non-free content policy. In addition to what has been said File:Cliff Dapper.jpg is a crop of this postcard. I can't help but wonder if the unacceptable use of A Barry Bonds baseball card, to illustrate the article on Barry Bonds. would apply to a postcard as well. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:50, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WMATA Thin Silver Line Map.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn as file was previously nominated recently, but no notice was made on the file page to inform editors of this until following this nomination. –Dream out loud (talk) 18:21, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fails NFC 1 and can easily be replaced by a non-free map similar to File:WMATA system map.svg. I believe a free map including the Silver Line already exists, although I could not locate it. I understand that the map is discussed in a section of the article; however, a free version could still be used to illustrate the points being made, such as the thinned lines and overlap of three routes at several stations. If the need for the non-free map is expressed, only a small portion of the map would be necessary to illustrate these points. –Dream out loud (talk) 21:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep (repetitive FFD following consensus keep on February 9th). You have got to be kidding me. This just went through months of discussion and passed a fair use test with consensus on February 9th (6 days ago). See the fair use discussion. Then, please see the history on the image, when admin Nytend TODAY noted to you (specifically) to "Kindly observe that it was deleted, then undeleted, and that it was later kept at FFD." Jkatzen (talk) 23:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No I am not kidding you. I do understand that there is some interest in keeping the map, but I do not feel that the entire map is needed to illustrate the points in the article. Fair use guidelines insist on using non-free content as minimal as possible, so while I'm not necessarily saying that the entire image should be deleted, I think that a portion of it should be to reduce the amount of non-free content that is featured. –Dream out loud (talk) 01:40, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated keep, as per last discussion. A self-made image meant to demonstrate the same point would be a derivative work, because "same point" here refers not just to the contents of the map, but to very specific creative choices in its design. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:14, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware of an FfD for this until after this nomination. Maybe next time an FfD takes place, an editor can take initiative to make note of that on the file page immediately afterward. I got no notification whatsoever on my talk page (or any other page) informing me of this (despite whatever Jkatzen said), so next time let's learn to communicate with other editors and not assume that everyone here knows everything that went on. –Dream out loud (talk) 18:21, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.