Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2015 December 12

< December 11	December 13 >

December 12

File:Sky over street with sunset.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused file, unidentified location. Kelly ^hi! 11:02, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Snakecharmer India.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused file, low resolution. Kelly ^hi! 11:12, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Son and Daughter.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused user photo. Kelly ^hi! 11:14, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tower House London.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused file. No evidence this is Jimmy Page's home as claimed. Kelly ^hi! 12:36, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HomeFriesCooking.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused file, low resolution. Kelly ^hi! 14:38, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kevin Stayner02.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, apparently no encylopedic subject. Kelly ^hi! 15:01, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kingrisinglevitation.nwr.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 15:02, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LeeMilteer.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:LeeTapingDiniPettyShow.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:TapingDVDSeminar.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

Delete - orphaned from speedily deleted Lee Milteer. Kelly ^hi! 15:15, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2015 Climate Conference.svg

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2015 December 26.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy closure (without prejudice). Infinite resolution is an intrinsic characteristic of vector graphics, so the concern expressed (and raised on previous occasions) applies to every non-free SVG file in use at Wikipedia, a practice for which no consensus to disallow has been established. This particular image's use presents no unique issues, so FfD isn't an appropriate forum in which to discuss the matter. A proposal to replace fair-use SVGs with non-scalable images should be made at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) and advertised prominently. —David Levy 18:42, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:2015 Climate Conference.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

I downloaded the PNG version of this SVG image. Currently, I am viewing the image at 400px, and the image is very big at that size when viewing the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference page. I believe that the format is too superior to make the use "fair". Shall we use the PNG format instead? (Note: the similar issue was discussed at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 November 23, but that was a different image.) George Ho (talk) 16:27, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of the file appears to be to display a small picture in the article, and the SVG file describes minor elements in the tower which are not visible in the size used in the article. The SVG file seems to be more detailed than needed for the intended purpose, so the file seems to violate WP:NFCC#3b. We should therefore delete the file, but it would be fine to upload a smaller file and use the smaller file in the article, provided that the smaller file is sufficiently small. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:48, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello George Ho, I thought I could upload the logo with the reasoning adapted from the logo of the 2009 Climate Conference. That image is used under 'fair use' and is an even more detailed SVG than the Eiffel tower logo from 2015. Am I on the wrong track here? -- Yours sincerely. Adrio (talk) 16:50, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That other file also seems to be unnecessarily detailed. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:01, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend replacing with a smaller file per Stefan2. Kelly ^hi! 17:04, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if I would call the size of a SVG display an equivalent to "resolution" for the purpose of WP:NFCC#3. This is an unsettled issue that has come up in the WT:NFC. Is that PNG a faithful reproduction of the logo in question?Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:48, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded the PNG version to the article. Now we must decide whether to keep the PNG or the SVG version. --George Ho (talk) 23:33, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The PNG version was removed (by somebody else) because the SVG version was still there. I reckon the logo can be replaced whenever a decision is reached to delete it. That isn't difficult. --BurritoBazooka (talk) 01:54, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
FYI: there is also a horizontal version of the logo: logo-cop21-en.jpg, which would be naturally more limited in size, given the shape of infoboxes. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 02:12, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ned lagin gd oct 1974.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 16:43, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

by depicting the subject of the article with the persons mentioned in the article, the file provides significant context. its presence significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding.

this file has been in the article for over one year. it is hard to believe that this file has not been vetted during that time. that leads one to conclude that the wiki admin has already made the decision as to what to do with the file and that this discussion is just pro forma for further action by the wiki admin(s) to vandalize this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ihorwi (talk • contribs) 18:36, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tony Farmer 725.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused user photo. Kelly ^hi! 16:49, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Line at Love Park Statue.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused file, low quality. Kelly ^hi! 17:46, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rod Roddy TPIR.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are three non-free images in use in Rod Roddy, all used only to illustrate the subject's appearance so only one of these can be justified per WP:NFCC#3. To me File:Rodpremiere1.jpg seems the best image for this purpose so I am nominating the other two for deletion. January (talk) 18:06, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rodroddy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are three non-free images in use in Rod Roddy, all used only to illustrate the subject's appearance so only one of these can be justified per WP:NFCC#3. To me File:Rodpremiere1.jpg seems the best image for this purpose so I am nominating the other two for deletion. January (talk) 18:06, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unnecessary to have three non free images, this one does not significantly improve the understanding of the article.Anon 05:13, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TheCribs-Logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - orphaned logo. Kelly ^hi! 21:24, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Theinternetsdave.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused user photo. Kelly ^hi! 22:23, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AEL50YEARSLOGO.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:24, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.