Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2015 November 23

< November 22	November 24 >

November 23

File:19and0pats.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCI No. 8. Image of a pre-release of a book that was ultimately never published (per The New York Times) can hardly be considered historical. Moreover, commentary in the articles are minimal, and mention of the title of the book without an image is sufficient to convey the minor event. —Bagumba (talk) 02:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Goo Goo Dolls - Vol. 2 Limited Edition.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Does not pass WP:NFUR, as it is very similar to the standard cover and not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nigel Holmes glasses icon.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused, probably no encyclopedic use. Kelly ^hi! 15:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Crisul Oradea logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All of these are displayed in FC Bihor Oradea "To identify the club and its crest." However, there is another file in the infobox to identify the subject of the article. These additional (WP:NFCC#3 violation) logos are not used for identification nor are they the object of sourced critical discussion, so they fail (WP:NFCC#8). Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 17:12, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As more than seven days have passed without objections, I have removed the images. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 23:02, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bar Rafaeli SI 2009 Swimsuit Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8, used in the cover model's biography only. The fact that she appeared on a magazine cover does not need an image of the cover to explain it. January (talk) 20:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agreed then and I agree now; fails NFCC#8. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 20:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:N2H+ Destruction.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image of table of text, replaced at diazenylium by wikitext table. Also including:

File:N2H+ Formation.png

bundled in this nom. DMacks (talk) 21:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Whatashort Main Page.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Mark Arsten (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unless the advertisement banners are removed from the top and bottom of this file (and probably the social media company logos on the bottom left), this should be deleted. Steel1943 (talk) 22:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty weak NFUR too. The article is up for deletion; if it's kept we can upload a cropped version and dump the current one under {{Orphaned non-free revisions}}. If it isn't kept just delete it as F5.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.