Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2015 November 8

< November 7	November 9 >

November 8

File:Sicario poster.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep most recent revision. — ξ ^xplicit 05:52, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The current image is the latest theatrical poster with bunch of reviews by critics. The previous image is a pre-theatrical poster meant for limited theatrical release, which was uploaded in July 2015. Stick with current image or previous (probably pre-theatrical) image? George Ho (talk) 05:11, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The newest upload is the final theatrical poster, and should therefore remain. Film Fan 15:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brad Renfro.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Originally tagged with {{nsd}} because it had no verifiable, useful source information, just a direct link to the image, fails WP:NFCC#10a. Mosmof (talk) 12:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:800px-Gibson County Indiana Incorporated Highways.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:15, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Something's off here, claimed as own work, but the author listed is not the uploader, Is Haworth a user name ( as I couldn't find them in the upload logs). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am Michael Haworth. This was one of my first uploads. Rhatsa26X (talk) 17:22, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The file name looks like a Mediawiki thumbnail name, which suggests that the file is a derivative work of an unidentified file. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:00, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:785px-Arty Call for Fire 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seemingly a scaled version of Commons:File:Arty_Call_for_Fire_1.jpg. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:49, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This one has some additional text. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons. Files are different. Reh man 13:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AdMetClosed.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, but can't be moved to Commons as there was a copyright concern. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:12, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:AdMetClosed.jpg because it seems to be unfree in the source country. Probably unfree in the United States too. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:02, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Day2NewYork 038.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan from deleted article. Kelly ^hi! 15:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Paul bio.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned from deleted article. Kelly ^hi! 15:19, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alfamexico.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo, can't be moved to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:25, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Literacy in the information age diagram.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned diagram. Attributed to another user but no evidence of this. Kelly ^hi! 16:00, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A Man and a Woman Soundtrack.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 and MOS:FILM#Soundtrack. Also fails WP:NFCC#3a as it is almost identical to the infobox image. Stefan2 (talk) 17:50, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Radio Disney logo 2008-2010.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Logo was uploaded by a bot on March 15, 2015 (as File:Radio Disney Logo.svg. However, I'm not sure if PD-TEXTLOGO is valid for this logo. Mega-buses (discusión / Talk) 20:26, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is made of text and three (incomplete) circles, so I think that PD-TEXTLOGO fits this logo.--Carniolus (talk) 20:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The circles seem more artistic than the border in [1] where the variant with a border was copyrightable whereas the variant without the log wasn't copyrightable. Therefore, I assume that this is copyrightable. Compare also with File:Prince logo.svg which is copyrighted according to the United States Copyright Office although it only consists of a ♀ sign and some extra simple shapes. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to be original enough to be copyrightable unless the Mickey Mouse ears as shown here are out of copyright (I dunno if the "Disney" text is copyrightable). Worth noting that this logo exists on Commons as commons:File:Radio Disney Logo.svg.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There's lots of other similar Disney logos already on the Commons, at commons:Category:Disney logos. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:13, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Swinburne University of Technology (sign).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to tag this for Commons, but I wasn't sure if the sign included was De-Minmis or allowed under FOP (in respect of Australia). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not de minimis (the sign is front and centre, and not just as a necessary consequence of making the photography), not a FoP case for Australia I think based on commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Entering Old Junee.jpg.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.