Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 March 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 4

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 4, 2012

Alice Sanger

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Disambiguate GFOLEY FOUR!22:16, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to disambiguation page. The 1890 article links to Alice Sanger, a historical person, but the redirect is targeting an article about a science fiction short story, which implies that Sanger is a fictional person. This creates confusion. 66.214.40.255 (talk) 23:26, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

February 28–March 3, 2012 tornado outbreak sequence

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete GFOLEY FOUR!22:10, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect caused by a page move. Technically incorrect as this was actually two separate outbreaks. Tavix |  Talk  22:20, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

FAEP – The European Federation of Magazine Publishers

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was (NAC) Kept. Per discussion below, the long-term use of the redirect as the article's name means that there could be inbound links to it. Ajraddatz (Talk) 04:36, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible typo and an unnecessary redir. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 11:44, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.