Wikipedia talk:Closure requests
| This is the talk page for discussing Closure requests and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
|
|||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Backlog of royalty related moves
[edit]There is quite a large backlog of royalty related move requests that had closure requests put in quite a while ago. 66.99.15.163 (talk) 20:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Press Your Luck
[edit]The following closure request was made over one month ago. Is there any way to expedite this? --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:29, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Heads up
[edit]There's a WP:PROPOSAL at Wikipedia talk:Notability (species)#Proposal to adopt this guideline. It's only been open for six days so far, but I thought I'd drop by and say that we'll be needing someone to summarize the results of the discussion next month. There have already been about 350 comments posted with about 1.2 tomats of text, so I suppose this is also a friendly reminder that the most reliable way to avoid getting stuck with closing a huge discussion is to go !vote in it. ;-) Alternatively, some closers like to read along as discussions happen, so they don't have to read a book-length in one sitting. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- The bot pulled the RFC tag almost 24 hours ago, so I've officially listed it at Wikipedia:Closure requests#Wikipedia talk:Notability (species)#Proposal to adopt this guideline. WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Adding the doing/working tag
[edit]I've noticed that closers have recently not been using the {{doing}} or {{working}} tag recently. It would be helpful if folks who are watching this page to close discussions could remember to do that so that we don't end up duplicating work. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)