Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom

Politics of the United Kingdom

PROJECT

Devoted to improving coverage of British politics on Wikipedia.

Categories · Featured content · Templates

This is the talk page for WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom.
Shortcut WT:POLUK Place notices here about UK politics articles, and you will surely receive helpful support from interested editors! Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. Be polite, and welcoming to new users Assume good faith Avoid personal attacks For disputes, seek dispute resolution
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Intergovernmental relations

I think that a section about the intergovernmental relations in the United Kingdom should be added as it is an important intergovernmental organisation that connects the UK Government and the Devolved Governments to discuss important matters. ChefBear01 (talk) 11:00, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the most recent version of this is the new Council of Nations and Regions.ChefBear01 (talk) 11:00, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to Talk:Politics of the United Kingdom § Intergovernmental relations (IGR)

New UK government coat of arms

The official rendering of the royal arms of Charles III in right of the United Kingdom as used by His Majesty's Government has changed. See this article from the Cabinet Office.

The Tudor crown is now used in place of St Edward's and the shield is no longer fully encircled by the Garter. All of our SVG files for government department logos now need updating. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 21:17, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

David Lammy

There is a current RFC at Talk:David Lammy#RfC: First sentence which is discussing how the subject should be described. Editors are invited to participate. TarnishedPath^talk 14:28, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty

Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:35, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Hello, there appears to be edit warring on a number of politician articles over the use of Home Secretary or Secretary of State for the Home Department. Keith D (talk) 20:46, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

State Visit to Samoa

Draft:State Visit by Charles III to Samoa needs some help. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 12:11, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

National Wealth Fund Classification

Hi there, I'm writing to request your help in a discussion I've started on the Talk:National_Wealth_Fund_(United_Kingdom) page. I'm not sure whether to classify the new National Wealth Fund as a sovereign wealth fund or something else. Any input would be appreciated.

Also, the new National Wealth Fund (United Kingdom) page could likely benefit from some further refinement. LunaExplorer (talk) 12:50, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI - a merge proposal

There's an open merge proposal at Talk:Winter fuel payment abolition backlash#Merge proposal that UK politics watchers might be interested in. -- DeFacto (talk). 09:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Crown Office#Requested move 28 October 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Crown Office#Requested move 28 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 15:45, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Aneurin Bevan

Aneurin Bevan has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Reactions to the 2019 Conservative Party leadership election for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reactions to the 2019 Conservative Party leadership election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions to the 2019 Conservative Party leadership election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Unknown Temptation (talk) 21:44, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source applicability & spectrum position on Conservative Party (UK

Cambial Yellowing and I are in dispute about the applicability of three – or four – sources being used to describe the position of the Conservative Party on the left-right spectrum. Outside opinion would be helpful in breaking the impasse. Cheers, Will Thorpe (talk) 13:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]