User talk:MGA73/Archive 54
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:26, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Eglintonmainsign.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sennecaster (talk) 03:24, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, 4ing (talk) 20:12, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:32, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Love River.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nw520 (talk) 23:52, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Jinshanlin 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nw520 (talk) 23:53, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Taishan 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nw520 (talk) 23:57, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Cebu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nw520 (talk) 00:04, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ci En Tempel Shenyang.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nw520 (talk) 00:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Guanghuatempel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nw520 (talk) 00:06, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Simatai 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nw520 (talk) 00:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Tai Qing Gong Tempel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nw520 (talk) 00:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Taihui 2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nw520 (talk) 00:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Taishan, Tourist Entrance.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nw520 (talk) 00:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Tian Hua Shan Leitern2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nw520 (talk) 00:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Wohnhaus Gensan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nw520 (talk) 00:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Yougutempel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nw520 (talk) 00:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Shenyang.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nw520 (talk) 00:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:SHE LI TA Shenyang.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nw520 (talk) 00:14, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Tian Hua Shan landscape.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nw520 (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Gensan BBQ.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nw520 (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Tian Hua Shan-Weg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nw520 (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Tanger blazon.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Εὐθυμένης (talk) 21:38, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Tanger blazon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
MGA73 (talk) 09:55, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Belawadi Mallamma.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Premeditated Chaos (talk) 05:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Please delete
Hi sir, how are you. I am sorry that I am bothering you. I uploaded a file to commons that I wanted to upload it to the wiki upload wizard. Due to not editing for a long time, I had forgotten the editing, hence the mistake was made. Now that I've uploaded it to the wiki upload wizard, please delete this file - Taaza Khabar Poster. VRJ Bandhu (talk) 11:52, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- @VRJ Bandhu: Done! --MGA73 (talk) 14:43, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Thanks sir 😊 VRJ Bandhu (talk) 15:15, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:49, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
License Review Request
Hi, I would be grateful if You reviewed my latest uploads from YouTube, all images are time-marked, regards ~~~~
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 & 13 14 Kacperpawlak (talk) 17:00, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Kacperpawlak:
Done --MGA73 (talk) 17:59, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Escanaba-Dorchester rescue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 06:55, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:U+2319 -- error.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
68.16.11.2 18:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Hejsa. Der skulle angiveligt være noget på vej i forbindelsen med subj, pr. da:Brugerdiskussion:KnudW#Rettigheder til foto af Bente Hagelund.
Kan du monstro se noget? Mvh KnudW (talk) 21:37, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hej KnudW! Ja, der er modtaget en mail. Jeg har lagt en henvisning til den på fil siden. Umiddelbart tror jeg, at den nok skal gå igennem. De skal bare lige formulere tilladelsen rigtigt. Der er en anden bruger, der har svaret (på engelsk). Jeg har tilbudt at tage over, hvis de gerne vil have svar på dansk. --MGA73 (talk) 07:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Leonel Sohns 16:08, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Selandia diesel.jpg
Copyright status: File:Selandia diesel.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Selandia diesel.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:32, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi MGA73, there exist a source with a higher resolution of this image: [1], published by Der Spiegel (online) in 2013. This journal attributes this image to “Foto: MAN” (scroll down to 4/12) where “MAN” refers to “Maschinenfabrik Augsburg-Nürnberg”, now MAN SE. You will find also a low-resolution version of this image in a PDF file about the history of MAN, see [2], p. 17 (archived copy). Perhaps it could help to contact MAN to research the origins of this image. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:12, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre and AFBorchert: I understod the information on English Wikipedia as the photo is from 1912. Therefore it is PD in the US and in Denmark we have {{PD-Denmark50}} so I was not worried about actual year or photographer. The link to Der Spiegel goes directly to the photo so I can't scroll down. I found another source that says "M/S Museet for Søfarts arkiv" meaning its from a museum. I will ask them if they have more info. --MGA73 (talk) 09:50, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi MGA73, to me this appears to be a photo-realistic painting but not a photo, hence {{PD-Denmark50}} does not apply. Please have a look at the waves in the lower right corner at the image at large resolution, the strokes of the brush are clearly to be seen. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 15:10, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi AFBorchert. Der Spiegel also say “Foto: MAN” according to what you wrote above. Personally I do not think it looks like a painting. The museum say photographer is unknown so that also indicates that it is a photo. Anyway if creator is unknown then {{PD-anon-70-EU}} should apply. --MGA73 (talk) 15:57, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- {{PD-anon-70-EU}} does not apply as long we do not have a proof of publication more than 70 years ago. Secondly, we cannot assume that the creator is unknown without further research. The first publication could possibly name the creator or the MAN archives could have more information about it. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 17:12, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi AFBorchert. The museum says MAN gave the photo to the museum and they did not give information about photographer so photograppher is unknown. I think that usually we trust that museums does what they can to gather information. But as I say if a photo then it is PD because photos are PD in Denmark after 50 years. --MGA73 (talk) 17:18, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Well, I think that this is a photo of a painting and hence we have to be careful about the copyright of the original work. We can turn this into a DR, if necessary. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:13, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi AFBorchert! Do you find any credible sources that indicate that it is a painting? This postcard also refers to it as a photo. --MGA73 (talk) 18:35, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi MGA73, for me this is obvious from what I see. I've now opened a deletion request. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 21:24, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Great, then we can discuss there :-) --MGA73 (talk) 06:23, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi MGA73, for me this is obvious from what I see. I've now opened a deletion request. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 21:24, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi AFBorchert! Do you find any credible sources that indicate that it is a painting? This postcard also refers to it as a photo. --MGA73 (talk) 18:35, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Well, I think that this is a photo of a painting and hence we have to be careful about the copyright of the original work. We can turn this into a DR, if necessary. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:13, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi AFBorchert. The museum says MAN gave the photo to the museum and they did not give information about photographer so photograppher is unknown. I think that usually we trust that museums does what they can to gather information. But as I say if a photo then it is PD because photos are PD in Denmark after 50 years. --MGA73 (talk) 17:18, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- {{PD-anon-70-EU}} does not apply as long we do not have a proof of publication more than 70 years ago. Secondly, we cannot assume that the creator is unknown without further research. The first publication could possibly name the creator or the MAN archives could have more information about it. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 17:12, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi AFBorchert. Der Spiegel also say “Foto: MAN” according to what you wrote above. Personally I do not think it looks like a painting. The museum say photographer is unknown so that also indicates that it is a photo. Anyway if creator is unknown then {{PD-anon-70-EU}} should apply. --MGA73 (talk) 15:57, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi MGA73, to me this appears to be a photo-realistic painting but not a photo, hence {{PD-Denmark50}} does not apply. Please have a look at the waves in the lower right corner at the image at large resolution, the strokes of the brush are clearly to be seen. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 15:10, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre and AFBorchert: I understod the information on English Wikipedia as the photo is from 1912. Therefore it is PD in the US and in Denmark we have {{PD-Denmark50}} so I was not worried about actual year or photographer. The link to Der Spiegel goes directly to the photo so I can't scroll down. I found another source that says "M/S Museet for Søfarts arkiv" meaning its from a museum. I will ask them if they have more info. --MGA73 (talk) 09:50, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Fly Over Hyd.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:20, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Colégio Militar School Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
✗plicit 02:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
hi, could you restore me this painting which is deactivated??? it is a Pd-old-100 nature file
Janiken98 (talk) 14:32, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Janiken98! I see that User:Krd deleted the file because uploader used multiple accounts. I find it a little strange that you ask for undeletion and that is your only wiki action globally? --MGA73 (talk) 18:01, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- yes here, could you also restore the other one listed?? since it has the same information as the first one?--Janiken98 (talk) 18:16, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please make the request at COM:UDEL. --MGA73 (talk) 09:17, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Central Tower.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 07:11, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:44, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:38, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Need your input on a policy impacting gadgets and UserJS
Dear interface administrator,
This is Samuel from the Security team and I hope my message finds you well.
There is an ongoing discussion on a proposed policy governing the use of external resources in gadgets and UserJS. The proposed Third-party resources policy aims at making the UserJS and Gadgets landscape a bit safer by encouraging best practices around external resources. After an initial non-public conversation with a small number of interface admins and staff, we've launched a much larger, public consultation to get a wider pool of feedback for improving the policy proposal. Based on the ideas received so far, the proposed policy now includes some of the risks related to user scripts and gadgets loading third-party resources, best practices for gadgets and UserJS developers, and exemptions requirements such as code transparency and inspectability.
As an interface administrator, your feedback and suggestions are warmly welcome until July 17, 2023 on the policy talk page.
Have a great day!Samuel (WMF), on behalf of the Foundation's Security team 23:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Cocked123.jpg
![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Cocked123.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:46, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Iidabashi Station-East Exit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Abzeronow (talk) 19:23, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Monet--Glas-Pijen--w.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Oursana (talk) 10:10, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Stamp blocks
Hello. Is stamps blocks are in PD if each stamp of those blocks is in PD? I mean in Ukraine stamps are in PD, but is the same for stamps blocks as File:Sheets of stamp of Ukraine, 2022, Good evening, we are from Ukraine! (1990).jpg? Andriy.v (talk) 14:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Andriy.v! Happy to hear from you! I think about Ukraine every day and hope you are all safe.
- I think that if the stamps are PD then the sheets of stamps are PD too. So I would also think that the file is PD. --MGA73 (talk) 15:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you MGA73 for the answer. I appreciate your closeness to Ukraine and ukrainian people, thank you for that too. Andriy.v (talk) 21:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Imported two files
Hello, MGA73.
I am contacting you about this file and this file I uploaded on jawiki. You imported them to commons but I think it is inappropriate since the photos are non-PD in USA. Please move them back from commons to jawiki to avoid file deletion request. In the following I would like to explain the reason.
- About the first file - The criteria for PD is cleared in Japan and in Germany but USA fails since the photo belongs to the work made by hire, which is protected in USA for 95 years after publication. The photo was taken in 1934.
- About the second file - We have to take Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) into consideration in the photo's case. The criteria for USA fails since the photo was taken in 1941. In Japan the copyright expired as of the URAA date (Jan 1st, 1996 for Japan) but did not in Germany on the URAA date (the same day for Japan) so that the copyright was restored in USA, which means we have to deal with it as a non-PD work in USA as of Jan 1st 1996. The year photographed is in 1928-1964 period so that it is protected for 95 years after publication in USA. Please see the USA part in the table.
Sincerely, -- HinokisOfRoma (talk) 08:12, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi HinokisOfRoma! It seems you are right. However according to Commons:URAA-restored_copyrights#Exceptions rights "covered by the wartime "alien property" copyright exception" ere not restored and I was under the impression that the US seized copyrights held by Nazis meaning that it is concidered to be PD in the US ("Mein Kampf" for example). Now that you wrote to me I checked again and it seem that perhaps the US did not seize all copyrights. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adolf Hitler letter to Carias Andino.gif for example. So it will be safer to restore the files on Japanese Wikipedia. --MGA73 (talk) 11:13, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi MGA73. Thank you for reply and cooperation. I think it is secure that these files are preserved in suitable wikipedia for the time being, too. Some commons users tend to resort to file deletion than survival by some scheme so I was afraid of such a situation. --HinokisOfRoma (talk) 08:22, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
And also:
![]() |
Files in Category:Monumen Nasional has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 13:03, 3 September 2023 (UTC) Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 13:03, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Dikrech (Monument Pol Eyschen).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Plakatsail zu esch 2010-03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 15:24, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 08:45, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 07:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:13, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:58, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Imidogen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Alfa-ketosav (talk) 07:51, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 15:42, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Review
Please review https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Photos-Urvashi-Rautela-and-Elvish-Yadav-snapped-at-college-fest-in-Juhu-6.jpg VRJ Bandhu (talk) 08:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Template:Idw/layout Abzeronow (talk) 18:11, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate 218.215.153.24 09:11, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Affected:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:45, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Appeal
Have a good time, I'd like you to urgently stay all files nominated for deletion in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Raisa Vasilyeva - Wikimedia Commons. The nominator everywhere writes the word "probably" but it is certainly my aunt depicted in all three pictures and two of them are uploaded by me, from two different accounts (see below why).
A nominator alleges that there are "fake licenses" of these photos, but three of four photos are licensed properly, and only one may be disputed. One of the uploaders of the photos is allegedly blocked on ru.wiki, but that has no relation whatsoever to the question of deleting the photos on Wikimedia Commons. All photos depict a Soviet singer who is the member of my family (my aunt).
File:R. Vasilyeva (my own photo).jpg - this file is uploaded by me from my second account, which I created because I had forgotten the password of this account for the few days. The photo is taken by me during the festival and clearly contains the tag "my own photo" and "has no copyright".
File:Vasilyeva.jpg - this photo is taken from my family album and originally taken by unknown photographer before 1973 in Soviet Belarus, so falls under the public domain definition in Belarus (see: Template:PD-Belarus).
File:Sovjet-zangeres Raisa Vasilyeva.jpg - this photo is not uploaded by me but its existence in Commons is proper because 1) it is preserved in Dutch National Archives under the CC license and 2) it is also taken by unknown photographer before 1973 in Soviet Belarus.
The nominator also mentions some unrelated deletion request associated with persons I don't know and who have no relation to my aunt, so this has no sense as well. Based on this, I ask you to urgently stay these pictures as lawfully uploaded to Wikimedia with proper copyright. I recently updated all copyright tags for these images. File:Раиса Никоновна Васильева.jpg is most likely the only one that is, just like the nominator said, "fakely licensed": it is credited to year 1986 even although it's not been taken in 1986 at all. It is also the duplicate of properly licensed file File:Sovjet-zangeres Raisa Vasilyeva.jpg which should stay as a Dutch CC file + pre-1973 Belorussian SSR image. Nevtreh ([[User talk:Nevtreh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- I will reply in the DR. --MGA73 ([[User talk:MGA73#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you Nevtreh ([[User talk:Nevtreh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- @MGA73 I have added info about the sources in the images. File:Раиса Никоновна Васильева.jpg can be deleted as a duplicate, as I've mentioned before. So I would be sincerely thankful if you closed the deletion request related to my aunt's pictures. I get very nervous everytime there is an issue related to my family members. Nevtreh ([[User talk:Nevtreh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hello again Nevtreh. You wrote that the source of File:Sovjet-zangeres Raisa Vasilyeva.jpg is Dutch National Archives. Is it online somewhere? --MGA73 ([[User talk:MGA73#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:52, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- I do not know if it's available online but my dad personally sent them this photo twenty years ago so it must be available, either online or offline. It is also from my family album, as I've emphasized. Nevtreh ([[User talk:Nevtreh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nevtreh. If your father send the photo to the Dutch National Archives then the Dutch National Archives are not the source. Your father is. Question is where he got it. --MGA73 ([[User talk:MGA73#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- I changed the source from the Dutch National Archives to family archive of Raisa Vasilyeva. We don't know who the photographer is, but due to the fact that the copyright of the image has legally expired under the existing law of Belarus, I think it's irrelevant to seek the photographer. Nevtreh ([[User talk:Nevtreh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nevtreh The license is only "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Netherlands" if the copyright belongs to Dutch National Archive and they released the photo as CC. If the copyright expired because of Template:Tl then that is the correct license. But for that license to be valid the author have to be anonymous. The best place to discuss is at the DR. So lets jump there. --MGA73 ([[User talk:MGA73#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:24, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- @MGA73 Hello. I have done everything regarding this issue, I changed the license once more and now all sources and licenses are marked properly. Can you now close the deletion request? Nevtreh ([[User talk:Nevtreh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- @MGA73 Hello once again. I'm very thankful for your "keep" vote, I spent a significant amount of time and nerves to fix the copyright issues and show that the images have right to remain on Commons. I'm very happy there are people like you in our society. Is there any possibility that you as an admin will close the deletion request (today or in upcoming days)? Nevtreh ([[User talk:Nevtreh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:37, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nevtreh Usually when an admin vote in a DR they let someone else close it. --MGA73 ([[User talk:MGA73#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:32, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- I understood it. Thank you and Merry Christmas Nevtreh ([[User talk:Nevtreh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:53, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nevtreh Thank you, and to you too :-) --MGA73 ([[User talk:MGA73#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:55, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- I understood it. Thank you and Merry Christmas Nevtreh ([[User talk:Nevtreh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:53, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nevtreh Usually when an admin vote in a DR they let someone else close it. --MGA73 ([[User talk:MGA73#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:32, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- @MGA73 Hello once again. I'm very thankful for your "keep" vote, I spent a significant amount of time and nerves to fix the copyright issues and show that the images have right to remain on Commons. I'm very happy there are people like you in our society. Is there any possibility that you as an admin will close the deletion request (today or in upcoming days)? Nevtreh ([[User talk:Nevtreh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:37, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- @MGA73 Hello. I have done everything regarding this issue, I changed the license once more and now all sources and licenses are marked properly. Can you now close the deletion request? Nevtreh ([[User talk:Nevtreh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nevtreh The license is only "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Netherlands" if the copyright belongs to Dutch National Archive and they released the photo as CC. If the copyright expired because of Template:Tl then that is the correct license. But for that license to be valid the author have to be anonymous. The best place to discuss is at the DR. So lets jump there. --MGA73 ([[User talk:MGA73#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:24, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- I changed the source from the Dutch National Archives to family archive of Raisa Vasilyeva. We don't know who the photographer is, but due to the fact that the copyright of the image has legally expired under the existing law of Belarus, I think it's irrelevant to seek the photographer. Nevtreh ([[User talk:Nevtreh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nevtreh. If your father send the photo to the Dutch National Archives then the Dutch National Archives are not the source. Your father is. Question is where he got it. --MGA73 ([[User talk:MGA73#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- I do not know if it's available online but my dad personally sent them this photo twenty years ago so it must be available, either online or offline. It is also from my family album, as I've emphasized. Nevtreh ([[User talk:Nevtreh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hello again Nevtreh. You wrote that the source of File:Sovjet-zangeres Raisa Vasilyeva.jpg is Dutch National Archives. Is it online somewhere? --MGA73 ([[User talk:MGA73#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:52, 16 December 2023 (UTC)