User talk:MCAspire

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:43, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Tairocr1887.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Tairocr1887.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 09:36, 22 May 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:36, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Howard-rail-station.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Howard-rail-station.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Theleftorium ^(talk) 10:04, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Bundabergrailwaystation.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Bundabergrailwaystation.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Theleftorium ^(talk) 10:04, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Do you have proof that File:Bundabergrailwaystation.jpg and File:Howard-rail-station.jpg are released under the Creative Commons Attribution 1.0 License? Theleftorium ^(talk) 13:59, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do not, as there is no copyright information on the websites I attained them from. I assumed they qould be covered under the Creative Commons license. I apologise if they are not.-5/24/2010-MCAspire (talk) 07:29, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can't upload images to Wikipedia until you are entirely sure that they have been released under a free license such as the Creative Commons. These images will therefore have to be deleted. Theleftorium ^(talk) 20:44, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Bundabergrailwaystation.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bundabergrailwaystation.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Theleftorium ^(talk) 20:42, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Howard-rail-station.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Howard-rail-station.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Theleftorium ^(talk) 20:43, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Hbrailwayline.png

A tag has been placed on File:Hbrailwayline.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 01:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Pialba railway station.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Pialba railway station.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 12:26, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Old maryborough railway station.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Old maryborough railway station.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Acather96 (talk) 11:22, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Mboro graffiti.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Mboro graffiti.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Acather96 (talk) 11:23, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry mate, completely forgot about the bloody copyright stuff.

File copyright problem with File:Nrthcoast title.png

Thank you for uploading File:Nrthcoast title.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:20, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Coonarr railway station

Hi. I am trying to find some source which shows that this place used to exist as a stop on the North Coast line, but I can't find anything. Where did you find it listed? Thank you. Frietjes (talk) 21:12, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nrthcoast title.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nrthcoast title.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:27, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral notice of an RfC

A Request for Comment has been posted for an article on which you have been an editor. If you wish to comment, go to Talk:Isle_of_Wight_Academy#RFC_regarding_mention_of_segregation_academy_in_lead_paragraph.2C_parallel_version_of_history.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 14:12, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Brisbane meetup with Sue Gardner invitation

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup on 11 Febrary 2013 with Sue Gardner, Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation.

More details can be found at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/7. I hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 02:43, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to you because your userpage (user:MCAspire) says you are located in 'Queensland' without specifying which region of Queensland you are located in. Please add a more specific sub-category in order to be informed of what is happening in your region.)

Proposed deletion of Coonarr railway station

The article Coonarr railway station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia:Notability of a closed rail station?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rob van vee 15:27, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery