Support as nominatorSpikebrennan 22:09, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support both alternate Great images. Can someone elaborate on the captions maybe? Surely we can some interesting facts on this. Jeff Dahl 03:33, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Now that I've looked at it a few times, the first is a little weak, not sure if it would pass on its own. Jeff Dahl 05:18, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt only The main nom is just too washed out, but the second image is very dramatic. Debivort 04:50, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alternate The alternate picture is much more striking and clear. Clegs 19:13, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support both, prefer Original. Unique, good quality, encyclopaedic.--Svetovid 10:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alt Per Debivort and Clegs NyyDave 14:49, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support alternative unique look at eruption, I also agree that alternative pic. is more eye catching, M.K. 12:01, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted Image:Etna eruption seen from the International Space Station.jpgMER-C 09:10, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]