1941 Hyūga-nada earthquake
  | |
| UTC time | 1941-11-19 10:02:32 |
|---|---|
| ISC event | 901083 |
| USGS-ANSS | ComCat |
| Local date | November 19, 1941 |
| Local time | 16:46:32 |
| Magnitude | 8.0 Mw |
| Depth | 35 km (22 mi) |
| Epicenter | 32°07′44″N 131°56′38″E / 32.129°N 131.944°E[1] |
| Areas affected | Japan |
| Max. intensity | JMA 5 |
| Casualties | 2 dead |
The 1941 Hyūga-nada earthquake occurred off the coast of Kyushu, Japan at 19:02 local time on November 19. The earthquake measured 8.0 Mw and had a depth of 35 km (22 mi). A JMA seismic intensity of 5 was observed in Miyazaki City and Nobeoka City in Miyazaki Prefecture, and Hitoyoshi City in Kumamoto Prefecture.[2] Due to the earthquake, a tsunami with a maximum wave height of 1.2 m (3 ft 11 in) was observed in Kyushu and Shikoku. The tsunami washed away many ships.[3] Twenty-seven homes were destroyed and two people were killed. In Miyazaki, Ōita and Kagoshima prefectures, telephone services were disrupted. Subsidence by 8 cm (3.1 in) was recorded at Hyūga, Miyazaki. At Nobeoka, stone walls and embankments were damaged while roads cracked.[4] It was felt as far as central Honshu.[5]
See also
[edit]- 1662 Hyūga-nada earthquake
- 1968 Hyūga-nada earthquake
- 2024 Hyūga-nada earthquake
- List of earthquakes in 1941
- List of earthquakes in Japan
References
[edit]- ^ ISC (27 June 2022), ISC-GEM Global Instrumental Earthquake Catalogue (1904–2018), Version 9.1, International Seismological Centre
- ^ "Seismic intensity database search" (in Japanese). Japan Meteorological Agency. Retrieved 1 October 2022.
- ^ National Geophysical Data Center / World Data Service (NGDC/WDS), NCEI/WDS Global Historical Tsunami Database (Data Set), National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA, doi:10.7289/V5PN93H7
- ^ "日向灘" [Hyuga Nada] (in Japanese). Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion. Retrieved 1 October 2022.
- ^ National Geophysical Data Center / World Data Service (NGDC/WDS) (1972), Significant Earthquake Database (Data Set), National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA, doi:10.7289/V5TD9V7K