If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.
Submission declined on 15 August 2024 by Frost (talk).
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Comment: See also WP:COI. Greenman (talk) 10:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment: The lead section has promotional language without backing sources, see WP:NPOV. The article is about the organization or the organization's polls? If the latter, are they even worthy to be on Wikipedia? Many of the sources mention People's Insight in passing. I'm not seeing how this passes the notability guideline. Frost 05:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Pollster, Public Opinion Research Company In India, Election Surveys, Exit Polls , Polling firm
People's Insight is a leading research organization which tracks Indian Elections and publishes[1][2] to provides valuable insights into public opinion, electoral trends, and market dynamics by opinion polls, market research, and data analytics.[3][4] The firm has worked in maximum states of India for General Election 2024.[4][5][6]
Comment: The lead section has promotional language without backing sources, see WP:NPOV. The article is about the organization or the organization's polls? If the latter, are they even worthy to be on Wikipedia? Many of the sources mention People's Insight in passing. I'm not seeing how this passes the notability guideline. Frost 05:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)