Lecretia Seales
Lecretia Seales | |
|---|---|
| Born | 4 April 1973[1] Tauranga, New Zealand |
| Died | 5 June 2015 (aged 42) Wellington, New Zealand |
| Cause of death | Brain tumour |
| Nationality | New Zealand |
| Occupation | Lawyer |
| Known for | Aid in dying advocacy |
| Spouse |
Matt Vickers (m. 2006) |
Lecretia Anne Seales (4 April 1973 – 5 June 2015) was a New Zealand lawyer who, upon suffering a brain tumour and enduring treatments for it, became an advocate of physician-assisted dying.[2][3]
Background
[edit]Seales was born in 1973. She received her secondary schooling at Tauranga Girls' College.[4]
Prior to her illness, Seales worked for law firms Kensington Swan and Chen Palmer & Partners, the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, and the Law Commission alongside Sir Geoffrey Palmer and Sir Grant Hammond.
In December 2015, Seales was named The New Zealand Herald New Zealander of the year.[5]
Illness and court case
[edit]In 2011 Seales was diagnosed with a brain tumour. She received brain surgery, chemotherapy and radio therapy but her condition continued to deteriorate. In 2015 she put a case to the High Court to challenge New Zealand law for her right to die with the assistance of her GP, asking for a declaration that her GP would not risk conviction.[6][7][8] Her claim had two parts. In the first instance she wanted the Court to declare that her doctor would not be convicted of murder or aiding suicide by assisting her to die given the nature of her illness and prognosis. Failing that she sought a declaration from the Court that the "Crimes Act" is inconsistent with her rights and fundamental freedoms, namely the right not to be deprived of life and the right not to be subjected to torture or cruel treatment, as contained in the New Zealand Bill of Rights.[9] While the alternative declaration would not have meant that a doctor could lawfully provide aid in dying to a competent, terminally ill patient, it would have demonstrated that the law as it stands is unjust[9] and potentially put pressure on parliament to change the law.[10][11]
In her statement of claim, Seales explained that:
I have accepted my terminal illness and manage it in hugely good spirits considering that it's robbing me of a full life. I can deal with that, and deal with the fact that I am going to die, but I can't deal with the thought that I may have to suffer in a way that is unbearable and mortifying for me.
I have lived my life as a fiercely independent and active person. I have always been very intellectually engaged with the world and my work. For me a slow and undignified death that does not reflect the life that I have led would be a terrible way for my good life to have to end.
I want to be able to die with a sense of who I am and with a dignity and independence that represents the way I have always lived my life. I desperately want to be respected in my wish not to have to suffer unnecessarily at the end. I really want to be able to say goodbye well.
Justice Collins declined to grant any of the declarations sought;
Although Ms Seales has not obtained the outcomes she sought, she has selflessly provided a forum to clarify important aspects of New Zealand law. The complex legal, philosophical, moral and clinical issues raised by Ms Seales' proceedings can only be addressed by Parliament passing legislation to amend the effect of the Crimes Act. I appreciate Parliament has shown little desire to engage in these issues. The three private members bills that have attempted to address the broad issues raised by Ms Seales' proceeding gained little legislative traction. However, the fact that Parliament has not been willing to address the issues raised by Ms Seales' proceeding does not provide me with a licence to depart from the constitutional role of Judges in New Zealand.[12]
Physician-assisted suicide advocates assert that the case lead to a number of important factual conclusions:
- That palliative care does not completely prevent suffering in all cases.
- That there is evidence of terminally ill people committing suicide before their illness deteriorates and they are no longer able to.
- That allowing physician-assisted suicide would not necessarily lead to the victimisation of vulnerable people.
- That there was no medical consensus against assisted dying.[9][13][14]
Additionally, Justice Collins expressed his sympathy for Seales' plight stating, "I fully acknowledge that the consequences of the law against assisting suicide as it currently stands are extremely distressing for Ms Seales and that she is suffering because that law does not accommodate her right to dignity and personal autonomy."[12]
Opponents of her case raised concerns of a slippery slope that would put other lives at risk.[15] However, such concerns were not put before the Court. Opponents did argue that assisted dying might put vulnerable lives at risk, but Justice Collins rejected the veracity of this argument, stating: "It is important to ensure that medical judgements are not based upon assumptions as to vulnerability. To do otherwise would devalue respect for the principle of individual autonomy."[12]
Death
[edit]On 5 June 2015 she died, aged 42,[16] the day after her family received the judge's decision.[17]
Impact
[edit]In June 2015, in response to Seales, Act Party leader David Seymour announced he would submit an End of Life Choice member's bill calling for a debate on euthanasia.[18] MPs expressed their support for a move to legalise assisted suicide, including former Labour party leader Andrew Little.[18] Prime Minister John Key publicly expressed support for legalisation, but refused to introduce a government bill.[19] Kevin Hague of the Greens announced the introduction of an assisted dying policy, the first of its kind in New Zealand politics, with the policy "given impetus by the case of Lecretia Seales".[20] Louisa Wall of the Labour Party tabled a bill to the Health Select Committee that would support assisted dying laws, inspired by Seales' case.[21]
In August 2016, Seales' widower Matt Vickers published a memoir, Lecretia's Choice, detailing his relationship with Seales and her decision to take the High Court case.[22]
Seymour's End of Life Choice Bill was drawn from the parliamentary ballot in June 2017 and was enacted on 13 November 2019,[23] subject to a successful Yes vote in the 2020 New Zealand End of Life Choice Referendum. Official results for the referendum were announced on 6 November 2020, with 65.1% of voters in favour of the End of Life Choice Bill, and 33.7% voting no.[24]
Since 2016 the Law School of Victoria University, Wellington has held an annual lecture in her honour, predominantly in the area of law reform.[25]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ "Today in History: April 4". The Post. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
- ^ Vickers, Matt (29 August 2016). Lecretia's choice: a story of love, death and the law. Melbourne, Vic. ISBN 9781925355598. OCLC 950881266.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ "Seales v Attorney-General – Lecretia's Choice". Lecretia.org. 20 March 2015. Retrieved 20 December 2015.
- ^ Picken, Dawn (7 June 2015). "Inside story: Lecretia's story of courage". Bay of Plenty Times. Retrieved 9 June 2015.
- ^ "Courageous woman New Zealander of the Year". The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 20 December 2015.
- ^ "Lecretia Seales story: 'Heartbreaking' but 'no place for the courts' say Family First". The New Zealand Herald. 21 March 2015. Retrieved 5 June 2015.
- ^ "Lecretia Seales: Lawyer with cancer embarks on challenge to New Zealand's euthanasia laws". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 5 June 2015.
- ^ "Judge thanks woman for right-to-die case". Radio New Zealand. Retrieved 5 June 2015.
- ^ a b c "ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF THIS JUDGMENT UNTIL 3.00PM ON 5 JUNE 2015" (PDF). Lecretia.org. Retrieved 20 December 2015.
- ^ "Statement Made at Press Conference – 5 June 2015 – Lecretia's Choice". Lecretia.org. 5 June 2015. Retrieved 20 December 2015.
- ^ "Statement Made at Press Conference – 5 June 2015". Lecretia's Choice. 5 June 2015. Retrieved 20 December 2015.
- ^ a b c Collins, Justice, Seales v Attorney-General [2015] NZHC 1239 at [211].
- ^ Geddis, Andrew (August 2015). "Aid in Dying" (PDF). Policy Quarterly. 11 (3): 27–29. Retrieved 20 December 2015.
- ^ "Seales v Attorney-General – Lecretia's Choice". Lecretia.org. 20 March 2015. Retrieved 20 December 2015.
- ^ "Seales' assisted dying case at top of slippery slope, opponents say". The Dominion Post. Retrieved 5 June 2015.
- ^ "Lecretia Seales: Death Notice". Stuff.co.nz. Retrieved 8 June 2015.
- ^ Savage, Jared; Weekes, John (5 June 2015). "Euthanasia case: Lecretia Seales dies hours after family received judge's decision". The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 5 June 2015.
- ^ a b JO MOIR AND TRACY WATKINS (5 June 2015). "Euthanasia debate back on the political agenda". Stuff.
- ^ Mei Heron (8 November 2016). "PM rules out govt euthanasia bill". Radio New Zealand.
- ^ Isaac Davison (21 September 2016). "Green Party says it would legalise euthanasia". The New Zealand Herald.
- ^ Phil Taylor (19 November 2016). "Lecretia Seales knew exactly what she was asking for: Louisa Wall". The New Zealand Herald.
- ^ Fiona Capp (9 September 2016). "Lecretia's Choice: A husband argues for the right to die". The Age.
- ^ Henry Cooke (13 November 2019). "MPs vote in favour of End of Life Choice Bill at final reading". Stuff. Retrieved 13 November 2019.
- ^ Hannah Martin (6 November 2020). "Euthanasia referendum: End of Life Choice Act officially passes with 65% majority". The Dominion Post.
- ^ "Lecretia Seales Memorial Lecture in Law Reform". Victoria University of Wellington. 31 December 2022. Retrieved 31 December 2022.