User contributions for Scisne
Results for Scisne talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 70 edits. Account created on 2 September 2010.
10 April 2024
- 08:1808:18, 10 April 2024 diff hist +648 Talk:Jesus in the Talmud →The second paragrah of this text is not very good
25 December 2023
- 22:0322:03, 25 December 2023 diff hist +1 Talk:Jesus in the Talmud →The second paragrah of this text is not very good
- 19:4219:42, 25 December 2023 diff hist +116 Talk:Jesus in the Talmud →The second paragrah of this text is not very good
- 19:3319:33, 25 December 2023 diff hist +198 Talk:Jesus in the Talmud →The second paragrah of this text is not very good
- 19:3019:30, 25 December 2023 diff hist −1,631 Jesus in the Talmud explanation in talk, original research presented as ground truth; There are two contradicting paragraphs on christian censorship in the overview of this wikipedia page
- 19:1719:17, 25 December 2023 diff hist +1,717 Talk:Jesus in the Talmud No edit summary
17 December 2023
- 23:0123:01, 17 December 2023 diff hist +265 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yekaterina Duntsova No edit summary
28 July 2023
- 17:0717:07, 28 July 2023 diff hist +390 Adam Delimkhanov Seems like a pretty important fact that he may have died, still no clear sign he is alive since June 14th
26 June 2023
- 09:3809:38, 26 June 2023 diff hist +163 Talk:Adam Delimkhanov No edit summary
24 March 2022
- 09:2809:28, 24 March 2022 diff hist +195 Talk:White phosphorus munition →Later uses entire beginning repeated: new section
19 November 2021
- 14:1614:16, 19 November 2021 diff hist +3 m Alain Jakubowicz grammar
4 April 2021
- 08:3008:30, 4 April 2021 diff hist +208 Post-finasteride syndrome Undid revision 1015910614 by AntiSemanticCanard (talk) Disruptive Edits by AntiSemanticCanard Tags: Undo Reverted
3 April 2021
- 17:1717:17, 3 April 2021 diff hist +208 Post-finasteride syndrome →Cause: removed without reason Tag: Reverted
30 March 2021
- 15:0115:01, 30 March 2021 diff hist +2 Talk:Post-finasteride syndrome →Survey
- 15:0115:01, 30 March 2021 diff hist +91 Talk:Post-finasteride syndrome →Survey
- 14:5914:59, 30 March 2021 diff hist −76 Post-finasteride syndrome No source, no synthesis or original research
29 March 2021
- 13:1013:10, 29 March 2021 diff hist −580 Finasteride →Mental Health Effects: No original research, Synthesis
28 March 2021
- 17:1417:14, 28 March 2021 diff hist +231 Talk:Post-finasteride syndrome →Why was this article recreated?: new section
- 15:5015:50, 28 March 2021 diff hist +458 Talk:Finasteride →Adverse Effects
- 15:4815:48, 28 March 2021 diff hist −538 Finasteride Undid revision 1014688314 by Sugarhouse90 (talk) The books states that there is emerging evidence, the book is 4 years old and uses 2 studies. This still sounds too much like an assertion of a fact Tag: Undo
- 15:2215:22, 28 March 2021 diff hist −514 Finasteride →Long-term: see talk page, asserted as fact but the source does not say this
- 11:4611:46, 28 March 2021 diff hist −499 Finasteride →Long-term: {{Page numbers needed}} A very specific claim is made but the citation goes to a book that has no apparent connection to finasteride. I asked the author for a page number in the talk section, they responded that the chapter is enough. what does emerging evidence mean? Tag: Reverted
- 08:0608:06, 28 March 2021 diff hist +681 Talk:Finasteride →Reuters Investigation: new section
27 March 2021
- 10:4610:46, 27 March 2021 diff hist +16 Talk:Finasteride →Adverse Effects
- 10:4510:45, 27 March 2021 diff hist +261 Talk:Finasteride →Adverse Effects
25 March 2021
- 10:2310:23, 25 March 2021 diff hist +296 Talk:Finasteride →Adverse Effects
- 10:1410:14, 25 March 2021 diff hist +287 Talk:Finasteride →Adverse Effects
24 March 2021
- 09:3709:37, 24 March 2021 diff hist +527 Talk:Finasteride →Adverse Effects
- 09:3609:36, 24 March 2021 diff hist +50 Finasteride →Long-term: The section from the secondary source is in the talk page. The secondary source found studies that support or undermine persistent sexual SE.
23 March 2021
- 11:4911:49, 23 March 2021 diff hist +77 Talk:Finasteride →Adverse Effects
- 11:4911:49, 23 March 2021 diff hist +898 Talk:Finasteride →Adverse Effects
16 March 2021
12 February 2021
- 08:5808:58, 12 February 2021 diff hist −214 Finasteride →Long-term: Allopregnanolone claim was unsourced, See talk page, misleading claim about "one study says"
- 08:5708:57, 12 February 2021 diff hist +1,747 Talk:Finasteride →Adverse Effects: new section
29 August 2020
- 12:5412:54, 29 August 2020 diff hist +198 Talk:Color terminology for race →China
- 12:4012:40, 29 August 2020 diff hist +7 Talk:Color terminology for race →China
- 12:4012:40, 29 August 2020 diff hist +217 Talk:Color terminology for race →China
- 12:3712:37, 29 August 2020 diff hist −117 Color terminology for race Undid revision 975598621 by 49.245.25.210 (talk) no source given, disruptive edits apparently by the same person, please argue in the talk page why you want to change this, Tag: Undo
- 08:0308:03, 29 August 2020 diff hist −65 Color terminology for race Undid revision 975512463 by 112.199.169.56 (talk) please go to the talk page and argue why you want to include this instead of changing it over and over again. Tag: Undo
28 August 2020
- 20:0820:08, 28 August 2020 diff hist −87 Color terminology for race →China: Reverting the last two edits, possibly bad faith edits, The new sentence was very long and hard to read and still contained no source, also the barbarians part does not seem to fit into this article. see talk page Tag: Manual revert
- 20:0020:00, 28 August 2020 diff hist +684 Talk:Color terminology for race →China
20 August 2020
- 15:3215:32, 20 August 2020 diff hist 0 Thitu Island No edit summary
15 August 2020
- 15:1615:16, 15 August 2020 diff hist +23 Color terminology for race →China: (in the talk section under China) No source given for red/pink skin but for red hair. Also ..,has,however,.. clearly doesn't look good
- 15:0215:02, 15 August 2020 diff hist +426 Talk:Color terminology for race →China
25 July 2020
- 11:5011:50, 25 July 2020 diff hist −658 2020 China floods →Three Gorges Dam: see talk page. It was not a quote but a summarized translation. First sentence had bad references and was politically loaded
- 11:4811:48, 25 July 2020 diff hist +750 Talk:2020 China floods →Regarding the section Three Gorges Dam
- 11:2211:22, 25 July 2020 diff hist +1,771 Talk:2020 China floods No edit summary
23 July 2020
- 20:5820:58, 23 July 2020 diff hist +33 2020 China floods →Three Gorges Dam: hype is used in the sense made a bigger issue than it really is. the original source uses the word hype incorrectly, it is not appropriate. It should either be a direct quote "" or be worded neutrally. the "" around distortion in the original also seem to downplay severity. shouldn't be copy pasted without marking it as a quote
- 09:2309:23, 23 July 2020 diff hist +54 2020 China floods →Three Gorges Dam: original text ("overseas media", "hype the distortion") was poorly worded and a copy paste from the article
