Stanford Internet Observatory
The Stanford Internet Observatory (SIO) is a multidisciplinary program for the study of abuse in information technologies, with a focus on social media, established in 2019. It is part of the Stanford Cyber Policy Center, a joint initiative of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies and Stanford Law School.[1]
Projects and reports[edit]
In 2022 alone [the Stanford Internet Observatory] published 15 white paper reports, 10 journal articles and garnered more than 5,000 media mentions.
— Lauren Coffey [2]
The SIO was the first to out Russian support for Trump online in 2016,[3][4] raised China spying concerns around the Clubhouse app in a 2021 report,[5] partnered with the Wall Street Journal in a 2023 report on Instagram and online child sexual abuse materials,[6] and developed a curriculum for teaching college students how to handle trust and safety issues on social media platforms.[7]
The Stanford Internet Observatory participated in pre-2020 election research focusing on misinformation about election processes and procedures, resulting in a 2021 report that concluded "The 2020 election demonstrated that actors—both foreign and domestic—remain committed to weaponizing viral false and misleading narratives to undermine confidence in the US electoral system and erode Americans’ faith in our democracy".[8]
SIO co-founded the Election Integrity Partnership along with the University of Washington Center for an Informed Public to identify real-time viral falsehoods about election procedures and outcomes. The partnership worked the 2020 and 2022 election cycles and has since concluded their work.[9][2]
In 2021, SIO launched the Journal of Online Trust and Safety, an open access peer-reviewed journal covering research on how consumer internet services are abused to cause harm and how to prevent those harms.[7][10]
Reception[edit]
Praised as "the gold-standard organization for determining the veracity of political information circulating online" by Thom Hartmann of The New Republic.[3]
In 2024, Lauren Coffey of Inside Higher Ed wrote that SIO "served as a research powerhouse with a focus on social media amid growing misinformation".[2]
Joseph Menn of The Washington Post wrote "The Stanford Internet Observatory [...] published some of the most influential analysis of the spread of false information on social media during elections."[7]
Targeted legal attacks[edit]
Disinformation research groups, including the Stanford Internet Observatory, having reported on such topics as the 2020 stolen election claims and COVID-19 vaccine misinformation, had been under attack by GOP resources accusing them of colluding with the US Government and social media outlets of censoring conservative voices. The GOP-led House Judiciary Committee subpoenaed Stanford University for any records or emails with government officials and social media platforms. In May 2023, America First Legal sued SIO and other researchers in Louisiana, aiming to bring down the "censorship-industrial complex". A Texas lawsuit filed by anti-vaccine advocates alleged their social media posts were flagged or removed in what it called mass censorship.[11][4][12]
These legal cases have cost Stanford millions of dollars in legal expenses and have distracted researchers from their work. A Stanford spokesperson said: "Stanford remains deeply concerned about efforts, including lawsuits and congressional investigations, that chill freedom of inquiry and undermine legitimate and much needed academic research — both at Stanford and across academia."[9]
Breakup[edit]
In June 2024, the Stanford Internet Observatory cut several jobs and several news outlets reported on its dismantling.[7][13][14][9] Leadership including Alex Stamos, the main fundraiser, had left in November 2023 citing the toll of the political pressure while Renée DiResta's contract was not renewed in June 2024.[13] The SIO's closure would mark a significant setback for misinformation researchers. Conservative lawmakers had also threatened to cut federal funding to any universities that study propaganda, while the Washington Post theorized the university also might not want to alienate conservative donors.[7] The New Republic critiqued the Republican efforts as an attempt to prevent fact-checking of GOP lies.[3]
In a statement to Platformer on June 13, Stanford denied that SIO was being dismantled:
The important work of SIO continues under new leadership... Stanford remains deeply concerned about efforts, including lawsuits and congressional investigations, that chill freedom of inquiry and undermine legitimate and much needed academic research – both at Stanford and across academia.[13]
On June 18, the school said it was not shutting down the project but said that its founding grants were running out and they were seeking new funding.[15]
Some SIO work has more concrete plans to continue under new leadership at Stanford, including work on child safety, The Journal of Online Trust and Safety and the Trust and Safety Research Conference will continue.[7][13]
See also[edit]
References[edit]
- ^ "The Stanford Internet Observatory Turns Two". Stanford Internet Observatory. June 7, 2021. Retrieved November 24, 2022.
- ^ a b c Coffey, Lauren (June 18, 2024). "Stanford Misinformation Group to Keep Going Despite Reported Cuts". Inside Higher Ed.
- ^ a b c Hartmann, Thom. "From the Border to Bump Stocks, the MAGA Lie Machine Is Heating Up". The New Republic. ISSN 0028-6583. Retrieved June 20, 2024.
- ^ a b Golding, Yona TR (June 10, 2024). "How Politics Broke Content Moderation : First came Elon Musk, then the House of Representatives". Columbia Journalism Review.
- ^ Lyons, Kim (February 14, 2021). "Clubhouse says it will improve security after researchers raise China spying concerns". The Verge. Retrieved June 20, 2024.
- ^ Vincent, James (June 7, 2023). "Instagram's recommendation algorithms are promoting pedophile networks". The Verge. Retrieved June 20, 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f Menn, Joseph (June 14, 2024). "Stanford's top disinformation research group collapses under pressure". Washington Post. Retrieved June 15, 2024.
- ^
- Paul, Kari (March 5, 2021). "A few rightwing 'super-spreaders' fueled bulk of election falsehoods, study says". The Guardian.
- Berlin, Seth D.; Safier, Paul (December 26, 2023). "Brief of the coalition for Independent Technology Research as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners" (PDF). SCOTUS. p. 9.
In advance of the 2020 election, the Stanford Internet Observatory, a CITR member, partnered with three other research organizations to form the Election Integrity Partnership. The partnership's purpose was to create "a coalition of research entities who would focus on supporting real-time information exchange" regarding the spread of potentially misleading claims about election processes and procedures.
- The Election Integrity Partnership; Digital Forensic Research Lab Graphika; Stanford Internet Observatory; UW Center for an Informed Public (June 15, 2021). The Long Fuse: Misinformation and the 2020 Election. Stanford University (Report). doi:10.25740/tr171zs0069. ISBN 978-1-7367627-1-4.
- ^ a b c Bond, Shannon (June 14, 2024). "A major disinformation research team's future is uncertain after political attacks". NPR.
- ^ "Announcing the Journal of Online Trust and Safety". Stanford Internet Observatory Cyber Policy Center. July 29, 2021.
- ^ "Disinformation researchers lament 'chilling' US legal campaign". Radio France Internationale. Agence France-Presse. May 7, 2023.
- ^ Claburn, Thomas (June 14, 2024). "Stanford Internet Observatory wilts under legal pressure during election year". The Register.
- ^ a b c d Newton, Casey; Schiffer, Zoë (June 13, 2024). "The Stanford Internet Observatory is being dismantled". Platformer.
- ^ Sato, Mia (June 14, 2024). "A major disinformation research center's future looks uncertain". The Verge.
- ^ Sato, Mia (June 18, 2024). "The Stanford Internet Observatory is facing "funding challenges."". The Verge. Retrieved June 20, 2024.