Talk:Đăk Nông province

Han tu

The Nom Foundation gives 多農, while the Chinese Wikipedia gives 得農. Badagnani (talk) 06:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking

It is not clear that the written place name 多農 did not exist (and was written in Sino-Vietnamese characters by official Vietnamese sources) before the actual official province was given this name. Badagnani (talk) 19:16, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's the onus of the person who added this information to show that it existed, not the other way around. DHN (talk) 19:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The characters came directly from a Nom Foundation researcher. Badagnani (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You should ask that they publish it and then use it as your source. DHN (talk) 20:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Đắk Nông province → Đắk Nông Province – Revert capitalization to pre-Kauffner status and current consensus. NVanMinh (talk) 17:49, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:An Giang province which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:59, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:An Giang Province which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Emblem of Daknong Province.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:54, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Emblem of Daknong Province.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]