Talk:1876 Atlantic hurricane season

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

1876 Atlantic hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 14, 2024. (Reviewed version).

GA Review

Passed. Tavantius (talk) 13:29, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:1876 Atlantic hurricane season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 02:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Tavantius (talk · contribs) 05:47, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

A cursory look reveals that it's a great article and I'll accept, however, I do have some minor proposals prior to accepting it.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
No problems here. Everything follows the general Manual of Style. There are no
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
All the sources I accessed support this article and Earwig revealed no real copyvios. However, could you archive the urls if you have time.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
While the article itself is fine, I'm not too sure about the notability of the 1876 San Felipe hurricane, which has unsourced sections and seems like it can be easily merged. Do that and I'll accept it. Never mind that. Seems like you've expanded the San Felipe article significantly.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Obviously. The article is written in a neutral way and acknowledges potential systems as needed.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Obviously not.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Everything's great. However, I encourage you to replace the old track maps with ones that follow WikiProject Weather's new color style, although doing that isn't required.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
~~It's a nice article, however, if you can merge the San Felipe hurricane and update the track maps, I'll accept it.~~ Seems like you've expanded it enough. I'll accept it. However, if you have time, could you update the track maps to the 2022 scale? It's not required, but it'd be nice. Tavantius (talk) 05:48, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.