Talk:2000 French Grand Prix/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nascarking (talk · contribs) 19:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Any number between one and twelve should be spelled out.
Corrected the number issue Z105space (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
The pictures of Coulthard and Häkkinen could be moved down a little, but it's not a deal-breaker.
Done Z105space (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass:
Just fix the minor issue with the spelling out of numbers that should be and this will be a pass.--Nascar king 19:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Nascarking: All the issues have been fixed. Z105space (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Then I hereby give 2000 French Grand Prix a pass. It's now a Good Article.--Nascar king 19:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]