Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:2006 Hengchun earthquakes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Map showing areas affected by the earthquake
Map showing location of Pingtung County

Untitled

[edit]

This earthquake took place so close off the coast of Pingtung County, Taiwan. It's not really in the Luzon Strait. I propose to move this article to 2006 Pingtung earthquake. Comments anyone ? --PFHLai 17:50, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I agree. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 17:58, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
How about 2006 South Taiwan earthquake ? Most people outside Taiwan won't know where Pingtung is. --PFHLai 18:10, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's being called the Hengchen Earthquake here in Taiwan. I think this should be the title of the article, with redirects for Luzon Strait Earthquake and Pingtung Earthquake. ludahai 魯大海 04:39, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I pulled no relevant pages with a search on "Luzon Strait Earthquake". Unless someone comes up with relevant links using that name, I will change the name of this page to "2006 Hengchun Earthquake" tomorrow. ludahai 魯大海 09:21, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good to me. I also find no sources that refer to it as the Luzon Strait earthquake. Gzkn 09:25, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I thought I moved the page to Hengchun earthquake, but I merely created a redirect. How can I move this page to the lower-case title? ludahai 魯大海 10:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Magnitude

[edit]

Someone might want to check out and note that the difference in magnitude by agency is caused by the fact that the different agencies are using different scales of magnitude. USGS uses Moment magnitude scale and the Taiwanese weather bureau uses Richter magnitude scale - hence different magnitude recordings. Aelfthrytha 18:02, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

self-reference

[edit]

Under the Hong Kong section:

Wikipedia, search engines, online messengers like ICQ and MSN Messenger...

Shouldn't we avoid self-references, and take out Wikipedia? --71.138.133.213 20:54, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is not self-reference in the sense referred to in that Wikipedia guideline. That is, that sentence still holds true even if moved to another website or reference work, and Wikipedia is listed as one of several important services cut off by the earthquake. The point is to avoid any assertions that this article is a Wikipedia article. --68.126.201.36 10:09, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:07, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:07, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:07, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:07, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:07, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:08, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:08, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2006 Hengchun earthquakes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:48, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2006 Hengchun earthquakes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:46, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2006 Hengchun earthquakes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:39, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]