Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Talk:2008 vote of confidence in the Manmohan Singh ministry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Abstensions and cross voting

[edit]

Within the media reports there are a lot of contradicitions and so it is not easy to piece together the exact voting records. For example some article claims that Aadikesavulu of the TDP MP abstained, some claim that he cross-voted. This article says that even the TDP isn't sure what happened. One thing is sure. The figures on our wikipedia article related to the abstensions and cross-voting are dubious. Either this fact should be mentioned or the whole list should be removed until verifiable facts are present.--Shahab (talk) 04:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should just stick to HT, TOI and PTI for this. above all we should take PTI as gospel. the rest are all suspect. ChiragPatnaik (talk) 09:42, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wo, very suspect as taking any 1 source as taking any 1 source as gospel. But if something can be backed by multiple sources then we sould accept it IMO. This should also work to get that banner out of there. Lihaas (talk) 09:33, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2008 Lok Sabha vote of confidence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:12, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]