Talk:2010 Heluva Good! Sour Cream Dips 400
![]() | 2010 Heluva Good! Sour Cream Dips 400 has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
GA Review[edit]
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2010 Heluva Good! Sour Cream Dips 400/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Derild4921☼ 21:53, 3 September 2010 (UTC) Back again! Seeing how this is a very old nominee I'll review this now. Derild4921☼ 21:53, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- I didn't even recongnize that I had another up for review. Humm? Nascar1996 22:35, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Well, it's from 2 months ago. lol. Derild4921☼ 22:37, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, I'll be out today for a soccer tournament. I'll be one tomorrow. Derild4921☼ 16:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
In depth review[edit]
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- Lead has to be expanded as with the other NASCAR article you've written.
- Some terms and phrases are confusing such as "Three drivers had to move to the rear from a change after first practice". What is a "Change"?
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Congrats! I have passed the article! Derild4921☼ 23:36, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Comments from other editors[edit]
- In the lead, it says claim his fourth win of the season for Hamlin in paragraph 2, yet in paragraph 3, it says Hamlin's fifth win of the season. Which is it? Either way, I would remove one of the mentions (I'd go for removing the one in paragraph 3) as they are redundant. Airplaneman ✈ 02:54, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- Checklinks reveals one dead link, which I have tagged. Airplaneman ✈ 03:49, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Done Nascar1996 12:57, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2010 Heluva Good! Sour Cream Dips 400. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100912133620/http://www.nascar.com/races/tracks/ to http://www.nascar.com/races/tracks/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)