Talk:224 West 57th Street
Appearance
224 West 57th Street has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 22, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from 224 West 57th Street appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 December 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 10:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that 224 West 57th Street (pictured), once an automobile showroom, was later occupied by Hearst Communications and then George Soros' Open Society Foundations? Source: Landmarks p. 6, WSJ 2011
- ALT1:... that 224 West 57th Street (pictured) was built as two separate automobile showrooms, which were occupied by their original clients for less than a decade after their completion? Source: NY Times 2007
- ALT2:... that the two automobile showrooms comprising New York City's 224 West 57th Street (pictured) were designed to complement a now-demolished church? Source: Landmarks p. 2
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/The South's Finest
- Comment:
QPQ pending.I will come up with more hooks later.
Created by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 21:09, 9 November 2020 (UTC).
- Massively expanded and nominated within date, very well illustrated and adequate length. Exceptional references. ALT1 is a more tempting hook. Thank you for another great article. No Swan So Fine (talk) 15:48, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:224 West 57th Street/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk · contribs) 23:16, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Epicgenius, finally a "brief" article . I'll be reviewing this soon. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 23:16, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Epicgenius, This was a very well written article and I am happy to say there was nothing I can see that wouldn't make this an automatic pass. All of the references are formatted correctly, there are no spelling errors, everything is sourced, and all the pictures are properly attributed. Congrats! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 18:08, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Art and architecture good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class Architecture articles
- Low-importance Architecture articles
- GA-Class Historic sites articles
- Low-importance Historic sites articles
- WikiProject Historic sites articles
- GA-Class New York City articles
- Low-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Articles created or improved during WikiProject United States' 50,000 Challenge
- WikiProject United States articles