Talk:A2 (Croatia)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough 48 72 01:22, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Can some information about the planning of A2 be added to the history? Also, can the letter classification of the rest areas be added to the table?
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I will place the article on hold for a couple of concerns to be addressed. Dough 48 72 01:22, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review and comments. I have already added a paragraph on planning of the route to the history section. As far as letter codes assigned to the rest areas are concerned, adding them to the table should not be a problem, however I am concerned that without a source specifying letter designations with specific rest area names, this would constitute WP:SYNTH. I have added this column to the table but as I'm unsure about this issue, I'd like to have your feedback on this.--Tomobe03 (talk) 14:24, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see any harm with adding the letters as such, as the source for the letter designation just verifies that the specific letter is used for that type of rest area based on the description. The article looks good now so I will pass it. Dough 48 72 17:03, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]